You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cloudstack.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/08/17 21:36:23 UTC

[GitHub] [cloudstack] gerolamo-ov opened a new issue #5330: MS does not recreate SSVM after upgrade

gerolamo-ov opened a new issue #5330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5330


   <!--
   Verify first that your issue/request is not already reported on GitHub.
   Also test if the latest release and main branch are affected too.
   Always add information AFTER of these HTML comments, but no need to delete the comments.
   -->
   
   ##### ISSUE TYPE
   <!-- Pick one below and delete the rest -->
    * Bug Report
   
   ##### COMPONENT NAME
   <!--
   
   -->
   ~~~
   SSVM
   ~~~
   
   ##### CLOUDSTACK VERSION
   <!--
   
   -->
   
   ~~~
   4.15.1
   ~~~
   
   ##### CONFIGURATION
   <!--
   
   -->
   advanced networking, kvm
   
   ##### OS / ENVIRONMENT
   <!--
   
   -->
   ubuntu 20.04
   
   ##### SUMMARY
   <!-- Explain the problem/feature briefly -->
   After upgrading from 4.9 to 4.15.1, everything appeared to be ok until the last step in which we have to upgrade systemVMs and virtual routers.
   Stopping and restarting SSVM and Console proxy VM worked (with VM based on 4.15.1 template) but SSVM seemd to have an intermittend "disconnected" state
   So we tried to destroy the SSVM in order to recreate it, but, after deleting it, the SSVM was not automatically recreated.
   
   No errors appears to be in error logs.
   
   Is there a way to force SSVM to recreate?
   
   ##### STEPS TO REPRODUCE
   <!--
   For bugs, show exactly how to reproduce the problem, using a minimal test-case. Use Screenshots if accurate.
   
   For new features, show how the feature would be used.
   -->
   
   <!-- Paste example playbooks or commands between quotes below -->
   ~~~
   
   ~~~
   
   <!-- You can also paste gist.github.com links for larger files -->
   
   ##### EXPECTED RESULTS
   <!-- What did you expect to happen when running the steps above? -->
   
   ~~~
   SSVM recreated automatically
   ~~~
   
   ##### ACTUAL RESULTS
   <!-- What actually happened? -->
   
   <!-- Paste verbatim command output between quotes below -->
   ~~~
   No SSVM recreated
   ~~~
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack] shwstppr commented on issue #5330: MS does not recreate SSVM after upgrade

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
shwstppr commented on issue #5330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5330#issuecomment-900971897


   @gerolamo-ov from DB:
   ```
   mysql> select * from configuration where name='secondary.storage.vm'\G
   *************************** 1. row ***************************
        category: Hidden
        instance: DEFAULT
       component: management-server
            name: secondary.storage.vm
           value: true
     description: Deploys a VM per zone to manage secondary storage if true, otherwise secondary storage is mounted on management server
   default_value: false
         updated: NULL
           scope: NULL
      is_dynamic: 0
   ```
   Intention of this config can be seen from its description. I'm not sure why it is a hidden config. Although ACS do have some other hidden(not available in UI) configs as well and maybe the reason for them to be hidden is their very specific use-case.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack] nvazquez closed issue #5330: MS does not recreate SSVM after upgrade

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
nvazquez closed issue #5330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5330


   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack] gerolamo-ov commented on issue #5330: MS does not recreate SSVM after upgrade

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
gerolamo-ov commented on issue #5330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5330#issuecomment-900967001


   Hi,
   according to this Wido's blog post:
   https://blog.widodh.nl/2013/04/cloudstack-zone-x-is-is-not-ready-to-launch-console-proxy-yet/
   
   Brief: there is a configuration in DB, not visible in UI: “secondary.storage.vm”
   
   In our environment this was setted as pseudo random string.
   Setting this value to "true" in database and restarting the MS, resolved the issue.
   
   What is “secondary.storage.vm” intended for and why is this setting not visible in UI?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack] shwstppr commented on issue #5330: MS does not recreate SSVM after upgrade

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
shwstppr commented on issue #5330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5330#issuecomment-900971897


   @gerolamo-ov from DB:
   ```
   mysql> select * from configuration where name='secondary.storage.vm'\G
   *************************** 1. row ***************************
        category: Hidden
        instance: DEFAULT
       component: management-server
            name: secondary.storage.vm
           value: true
     description: Deploys a VM per zone to manage secondary storage if true, otherwise secondary storage is mounted on management server
   default_value: false
         updated: NULL
           scope: NULL
      is_dynamic: 0
   ```
   Intention of this config can be seen from its description. I'm not sure why it is a hidden config. Although ACS do have some other hidden(not available in UI) configs as well and maybe the reason for them to be hidden is their very specific use-case.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack] rhtyd commented on issue #5330: MS does not recreate SSVM after upgrade

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
rhtyd commented on issue #5330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5330#issuecomment-900900480


   Did you register the systemvm template for the specific version and wait till it was in ready state before your upgrade? Can you share management server logs?
   
   Usually you need to read through the ms and kvm agent logs as to why ssvm is not being launched. Usual suspects are a corrupt or missing systemvm template or template not in ready state, storage issue (capacity, mounting issue or path/permissions). 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack] gerolamo-ov commented on issue #5330: MS does not recreate SSVM after upgrade

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
gerolamo-ov commented on issue #5330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5330#issuecomment-900967001


   Hi,
   according to this Wido's blog post:
   https://blog.widodh.nl/2013/04/cloudstack-zone-x-is-is-not-ready-to-launch-console-proxy-yet/
   
   Brief: there is a configuration in DB, not visible in UI: “secondary.storage.vm”
   
   In our environment this was setted as pseudo random string.
   Setting this value to "true" in database and restarting the MS, resolved the issue.
   
   What is “secondary.storage.vm” intended for and why is this setting not visible in UI?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack] rhtyd commented on issue #5330: MS does not recreate SSVM after upgrade

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
rhtyd commented on issue #5330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5330#issuecomment-900900480


   Did you register the systemvm template for the specific version and wait till it was in ready state before your upgrade? Can you share management server logs?
   
   Usually you need to read through the ms and kvm agent logs as to why ssvm is not being launched. Usual suspects are a corrupt or missing systemvm template or template not in ready state, storage issue (capacity, mounting issue or path/permissions). 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org