You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> on 2013/07/30 15:59:50 UTC

Re: svn commit: r1508423 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene: ./ core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/ core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/packed/ core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/util/packed/

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:42 AM, <jp...@apache.org> wrote:

> Author: jpountz
> Date: Tue Jul 30 12:42:39 2013
> New Revision: 1508423
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1508423
> Log:
> LUCENE-5145: AppendingPackedLongBuffer and added suport for bulk get
> operations to the Appending*Buffers.
>
> Introduced bulk retrieval to AbstractAppendingLongBuffer
> classes, for faster retrieval. Introduced a new variant,
> AppendingPackedLongBuffer which solely relies on PackedInts as a backend.
> This new class is useful where people have non-negative numbers with a
> uniform distribution over a fixed (limited) range. Ex. facets ordinals. To
> distinguish it from AppendingPackedLongBuffer, delta based
> AppendingLongBuffer was renamed to AppendingDeltaPackedLongBuffer Fixed an
> Issue with NullReader where it didn't respect it's valueCount in bulk gets.
>

Do you think we should remove 'Long' from this class to help with the name?
e.g. can it just be AppendingPackedBuffer? (or something shorter)