You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@creadur.apache.org by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> on 2013/09/01 20:42:01 UTC
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
On 08/20/13 22:33, sebb wrote:
<snip>
> I think the only thing that could be improved is to generate the
> website from the 0.10 tag.
>
> The website should reflect the current GA release, not trunk, which
> does not correspond with a release.
>
> The Maven guys complained about this, and on this point I agree with them.
Sounds like a good plan.
Robert
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 09/01/13 21:00, sebb wrote:
> On 1 September 2013 20:53, Robert Burrell Donkin
> <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 09/01/13 19:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/20/13 22:33, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> I think the only thing that could be improved is to generate the
>>>> website from the 0.10 tag.
>>>>
>>>> The website should reflect the current GA release, not trunk, which
>>>> does not correspond with a release.
>>>>
>>>> The Maven guys complained about this, and on this point I agree with
>>>> them.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sounds like a good plan.
>>
>>
>> The 0.10 tag misses the updated download page,
>
> We should try and remember to fix that for the next release ...
How about using a parameter to substitute the current version during the
build...?
Robert
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 1 September 2013 20:53, Robert Burrell Donkin
<ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On 09/01/13 19:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>
>> On 08/20/13 22:33, sebb wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> I think the only thing that could be improved is to generate the
>>> website from the 0.10 tag.
>>>
>>> The website should reflect the current GA release, not trunk, which
>>> does not correspond with a release.
>>>
>>> The Maven guys complained about this, and on this point I agree with
>>> them.
>>
>>
>> Sounds like a good plan.
>
>
> The 0.10 tag misses the updated download page,
We should try and remember to fix that for the next release ...
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 09/01/13 20:55, P. Ottlinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 01.09.2013 21:53, schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat/branches/apache-rat-project-0.10-website/
>> (unless anyone jumps in with a better name)
>
> I'd propose 0.10-cms to make it clearer that it's just a cms-thing but
> not a 'general' webpage?
Yes
Robert
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@aiki-it.de>.
Hi,
Am 01.09.2013 21:53, schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat/branches/apache-rat-project-0.10-website/
> (unless anyone jumps in with a better name)
I'd propose 0.10-cms to make it clearer that it's just a cms-thing but
not a 'general' webpage?
But I'm fine with website as well.
Cheers,
Phil
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 09/01/13 19:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On 08/20/13 22:33, sebb wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> I think the only thing that could be improved is to generate the
>> website from the 0.10 tag.
>>
>> The website should reflect the current GA release, not trunk, which
>> does not correspond with a release.
>>
>> The Maven guys complained about this, and on this point I agree with
>> them.
>
> Sounds like a good plan.
The 0.10 tag misses the updated download page, so we'll probably need to
take a small branch from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat/tags/apache-rat-project-0.10/
perhaps something like
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat/branches/apache-rat-project-0.10-website/
(unless anyone jumps in with a better name)
Robert