You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2004/04/06 00:45:06 UTC

Re: OPM now included in SpamHaus XBL

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Daniel Quinlan writes:
> jm@apache.org writes:
> 
> > +# 2004-03-31: OPM now included in Spamhaus XBL, so no need to perform
> > +# duplicate lookups.
> 
> Looks good to me.  One caveat is that "only" 99.8% of our OPM hits are
> in XBL.
> 
> I checked the corpus results for the April 3rd weekly run and these are
> the estimated recevied dates of those messages:
> 
> Sun Feb 29 22:05:35 2004
> Sat Mar 20 17:49:02 2004
> Tue Mar 23 07:23:00 2004
> Tue Mar 23 08:48:27 2004
> Tue Mar 23 08:48:27 2004
> Thu Mar 25 09:59:18 2004
> Tue Mar 30 09:00:57 2004
> Tue Mar 30 09:00:57 2004
> Thu Apr  1 05:05:17 2004
> Thu Apr  1 05:07:46 2004
> 
> Pretty well distributed, so those are probably just time-outs or other
> randomness.  I think 99.8% is close enough, but we should perhaps see
> what the real-time difference is.
> 
> For the last week of my spam, it's only 96.6% so it seems like the XBL
> feed from OPM is a bit behind.

Hmm!! that's a good point!

Do you want to pass that on to the spamhaus and OPM guys, or will I?

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFAceFyQTcbUG5Y7woRAuJNAJsG0mJnPcU9ITsU3WqBcwKiL3BSnQCgiCRj
57Wagb1yl1b5LBRJ1qPvVFo=
=75+f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----