You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/07/06 21:27:11 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9180) need better cloud & RTG testing of TestPseudoReturnFields

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15365134#comment-15365134 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9180:
-------------------------------------------------------

Commit ae316f1e39e58d89758f997913a38059d74ccb47 in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/master from Chris Hostetter
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=ae316f1 ]

SOLR-9180: More comprehensive tests of psuedo-fields for RTG and SolrCloud requests

This commit also includes new @AwaitsFix'ed tests for the following known issues...

 * SOLR-9285 ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when ValueSourceAugmenter used with RTG on uncommitted doc
 * SOLR-9286 SolrCloud RTG: psuedo-fields (like ValueSourceAugmenter, [shard], etc...) silently fails (even for committed doc)
 * SOLR-9287 single node RTG: NPE if score is requested
 * SOLR-9288 RTG: fl=[docid] silently missing for uncommitted docs
 * SOLR-9289 SolrCloud RTG: fl=[docid] silently ignored for all docs


> need better cloud & RTG testing of TestPseudoReturnFields
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-9180
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9180
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Test
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>            Assignee: Hoss Man
>         Attachments: SOLR-9180.patch, SOLR-9180.patch, SOLR-9180.patch
>
>
> on the mailing list, Charles Sanders noted that the {{[explain]}} transformer wasn't working in Solr 5(.5.1) - showing a sample query that indicated he was using SolrCloud.
> In 6.0 and on master this works fine, so whatever bug affects 5.x was fixed at some point -- but we don't appear to have any cloud based tests that invoke {{[explain]}}, so we should add something akin to TestPseudoReturnFields to ensure no regressions in the future.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org