You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lens.apache.org by Puneet Gupta <pu...@gmail.com> on 2018/01/09 08:34:08 UTC
Re: Review Request 64779: NPE fix in closing idle connections
[LENS-1497]
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64779/#review195018
-----------------------------------------------------------
lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/BaseLensService.java
Lines 231-235 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64779/#comment274119>
Is this required for restoreSession(...)flow only? If yes can we move it there ?
lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/BaseLensService.java
Lines 236 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64779/#comment274118>
Why is this required ?
This method is called from openSession(..) and restoreSession(). The openSession call is already synchronized on sessionUser and the restoreSession happens in a single thread wand should not require synchronization.
lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/BaseLensService.java
Lines 350 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64779/#comment274120>
This should not be required now since we are adding missing users to this map on restoreSession.
- Puneet Gupta
On Dec. 21, 2017, 3:40 p.m., Rajitha R wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/64779/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Dec. 21, 2017, 3:40 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for lens and Puneet Gupta.
>
>
> Bugs: LENS-1497
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1497
>
>
> Repository: lens
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> NPE fix in closing idle connections
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/BaseLensService.java d7ce434
>
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64779/diff/3/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rajitha R
>
>