[PROPOSAL] Interceptors and Lifecycle Consensus?

[Leo Sutic <le...@inspireinfrastructure.com>]

Here:

     http://www.java.no/web/moter/moteSep02/AOP_files/frame.html

is an article on interceptors.

As far as the lifecycle package is concerned, I'd like to paint a
big bullseye on that article.

The objections to the lifecycle package seem to be that it is not 
capable enough, so how about this:

 1. Release it as-is, but keep it in Excalibur
    Hey, we need to get stuff out the door.

 2. Set your GPS systems, laser guidance kits etc. to:
    http://www.java.no/web/moter/moteSep02/AOP_files/frame.html
    That's what we should be able to support.

 3. Hold off on moving lifecycle -> framework.

/LS


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Interceptors and Lifecycle Consensus?

[dv...@phpapp.org]

Quoting Leo Sutic <le...@inspireinfrastructure.com>:
> Here:
> 
>      http://www.java.no/web/moter/moteSep02/AOP_files/frame.html

And there for better rendering of graphics :)

http://www.java.no/web/moter/moteSep02/AOP.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org