You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Andrew Wang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/06/26 20:24:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (YARN-6344) Add parameter for rack locality
delay in CapacityScheduler
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16063701#comment-16063701 ]
Andrew Wang commented on YARN-6344:
-----------------------------------
Hi, is the branch-2.8 patch going to be committed? This JIRA is in a dangling state, I'd like to resolve it for the release.
> Add parameter for rack locality delay in CapacityScheduler
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-6344
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6344
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: capacityscheduler
> Reporter: Konstantinos Karanasos
> Assignee: Konstantinos Karanasos
> Fix For: 2.9.0, 3.0.0-alpha4
>
> Attachments: YARN-6344.001.patch, YARN-6344.002.patch, YARN-6344.003.patch, YARN-6344.004.patch, YARN-6344-branch-2.8.patch
>
>
> When relaxing locality from node to rack, the {{node-locality-parameter}} is used: when scheduling opportunities for a scheduler key are more than the value of this parameter, we relax locality and try to assign the container to a node in the corresponding rack.
> On the other hand, when relaxing locality to off-switch (i.e., assign the container anywhere in the cluster), we are using a {{localityWaitFactor}}, which is computed based on the number of outstanding requests for a specific scheduler key, which is divided by the size of the cluster.
> In case of applications that request containers in big batches (e.g., traditional MR jobs), and for relatively small clusters, the localityWaitFactor does not affect relaxing locality much.
> However, in case of applications that request containers in small batches, this load factor takes a very small value, which leads to assigning off-switch containers too soon. This situation is even more pronounced in big clusters.
> For example, if an application requests only one container per request, the locality will be relaxed after a single missed scheduling opportunity.
> The purpose of this JIRA is to rethink the way we are relaxing locality for off-switch assignments.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org