You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "zhuojunjian (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/02/26 09:18:13 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-1781) Replication index directories not always cleaned up

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13586918#comment-13586918 ] 

zhuojunjian commented on SOLR-1781:
-----------------------------------

hi
sure this issue is fixed in solr4.0 ?
we find the issue in solr4.0 in our enviroment . 
I have created a new JIRA "SOLR-4506".
                
> Replication index directories not always cleaned up
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1781
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1781
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: replication (java), SolrCloud
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>         Environment: Windows Server 2003 R2, Java 6b18
>            Reporter: Terje Sten Bjerkseth
>            Assignee: Mark Miller
>             Fix For: 4.0-BETA, 5.0
>
>         Attachments: 0001-Replication-does-not-always-clean-up-old-directories.patch, SOLR-1781.patch, SOLR-1781.patch
>
>
> We had the same problem as someone described in http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201001.mbox/%3c222A518D-DDF5-4FC8-A02A-74D4F232B339@snooth.com%3e. A partial copy of that message:
> We're using the new replication and it's working pretty well. There's  
> one detail I'd like to get some more information about.
> As the replication works, it creates versions of the index in the data  
> directory. Originally we had index/, but now there are dated versions  
> such as index.20100127044500/, which are the replicated versions.
> Each copy is sized in the vicinity of 65G. With our current hard drive  
> it's fine to have two around, but 3 gets a little dicey. Sometimes  
> we're finding that the replication doesn't always clean up after  
> itself. I would like to understand this better, or to not have this  
> happen. It could be a configuration issue.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org