You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com> on 2017/09/26 21:24:55 UTC
[VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Hi Everyone,
I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place
your votes for a 7.0.4 release.
The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
--add-module java.xml.bind
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
Source zip:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
Dist area:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
Legal:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/legal.zip
Keys:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
Changelog:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12339959
Green buildbot:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
Please vote:
+1: Release
-1 Do not release because ... See below.
If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At least 3
binding votes).
Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you
very much for your time.
Andy Gumbrecht.
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>.
Hi Mark, how did your tests go?
Thanks, Andy.
On 09/10/17 05:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Sorry for the delay!
> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
> Will ping back once I know more.
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>
>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi Romain,
>>>
>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Alexandre
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>
>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>> repo>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian
>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>
>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>> <repository>
>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>> </repository>
>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>
>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>
>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version
>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>
>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-embedded</artifactId>
>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version -->
>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>
>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere on
>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check the
>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations
>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in TomEE
>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but it's
>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version -->
>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current
>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give
>>> feedback
>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run my
>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using
>>> the
>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is an
>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1
>>> based on
>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+
>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+
>>> binding
>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the
>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and
>>> checking
>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always
>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your
>>> help
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested
>>> all
>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4
>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9,
>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as
>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding
>>> (At
>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
>>> Thank
>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
My thanks to the committers for the continuous bug fixes and new features!
On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development setup. So
>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running it on my
>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>
>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just keep working
>> and report back if there are any issues
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>>
>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its those
>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't be
>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I believe). I
>>> think
>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so if you're
>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually.
>>>
>>> Jon
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>
>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>> strub
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>> :
>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian
>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version
>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version
>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in
>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but
>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version
>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current
>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run
>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is
>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+
>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the
>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested
>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
ok i have sent a message to taglibs-user@tomcat.apache.org to see if
they can help
On 26/11/2017 14:22, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> guess taglib community will have a more relevant feedback but that's
> what I had in mind at least, yes
>
> avoiding it in tomee means either removing the libs or deactivating
> the auto registration but none of these solutions are really stable
> and reliable on the long term.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>
>
> 2017-11-26 13:28 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>> sorry i meant javax.xml.*
>>
>>
>> On 26/11/2017 13:21, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>> not really sure what XalanUtil.getContext is doing
>>> public static XPathContext getContext(Tag child, PageContext pageContext)
>>> {
>>> // if within a forEach tag, use its context
>>> ForEachTag forEachTag = (ForEachTag)
>>> TagSupport.findAncestorWithClass(child, ForEachTag.class);
>>> if (forEachTag != null) {
>>> return forEachTag.getContext();
>>> }
>>>
>>> // otherwise, create a new context referring to an empty document
>>> XPathContext context = new XPathContext(false);
>>> VariableStack variableStack = new JSTLVariableStack(pageContext);
>>> context.setVarStack(variableStack);
>>> int dtm =
>>> context.getDTMHandleFromNode(XmlUtil.newEmptyDocument());
>>> context.pushCurrentNodeAndExpression(dtm, dtm);
>>> return context;
>>> }
>>> seems to be returning a document fragment but I am not familiar with what
>>> a VariableStack is or does. it feels like i can replace everything with
>>> jaxa.xml.* but this function needs clarification
>>>
>>> another question...i don't even use jsp (only jsf) so is there someway to
>>> remove or disable it in TomEE and this will avoid the whole issue?
>>>
>>> On 25/11/2017 18:40, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>> tomcat doesnt, taglib does implicitly
>>>>
>>>> you can try to hack openejb.classloader properties to make it work -
>>>> without any guarantees
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-11-25 17:26 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>> does tomcat still ship with Xalan as a dependency? if so can we just
>>>>> use
>>>>> that? i don't really understand what is causing the error. is there
>>>>> some
>>>>> way i can get the correct instance of DTMManager from the classloader?
>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault
>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.newInstance(DTMManager.java:137)
>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerImpl.<init>(TransformerImpl.java:397)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.xalan.templates.StylesheetRoot.newTransformer(StylesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>> depends the perfs. If javax gives the same no need of xalan, otherwise
>>>>>> we would need some flag.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-11-21 11:52 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>> should xalan be available through some route or does everything need
>>>>>>> switching to some generic xml parser like javax.xml.xpath.XPath
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:28, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>> yes, that's the ones to fix - make it compiling + validate perfs are
>>>>>>>> still ok.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 11:25 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>> it is imported in these ones in main as well as loads in test
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:28:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:29:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:26:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:27:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:28:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:24:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:25:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:29:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:30:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:31:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:32:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObjectFactory;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:27:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:28:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:29:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:24:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:25:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:25:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:26:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:27:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XBoolean;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:28:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNodeSet;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:29:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNumber;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:30:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:31:import
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XString;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> No, you see this stack cause the test cant be loaded but it is in
>>>>>>>>>> several classes of taglib project, XalanUtil and a few others.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 11:14 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>>>> so do i need to replace it with something else? is that inside
>>>>>>>>>>> ReflectionUtils?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:08, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask
>>>>>>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>>>>>>> why xalan is not in the name ;))
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mvn install outputs this:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Method)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org/apache/xpath/VariableStack
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... 9 more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - compat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - impl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - jstlel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - standard-test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> output?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if you checkout
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> XPath
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way to go I think.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hi rmannibucau,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continue
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> busy period.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> svn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tree
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IIRC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignored?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'xalan'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <taglib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> optional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remove
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refs?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deploys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deploy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> customer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8.0.0,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Github
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> REST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arqulian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freeze"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> busy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> headers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JAXB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applicable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> encouraged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
guess taglib community will have a more relevant feedback but that's
what I had in mind at least, yes
avoiding it in tomee means either removing the libs or deactivating
the auto registration but none of these solutions are really stable
and reliable on the long term.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-26 13:28 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
> sorry i meant javax.xml.*
>
>
> On 26/11/2017 13:21, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>
>> not really sure what XalanUtil.getContext is doing
>> public static XPathContext getContext(Tag child, PageContext pageContext)
>> {
>> // if within a forEach tag, use its context
>> ForEachTag forEachTag = (ForEachTag)
>> TagSupport.findAncestorWithClass(child, ForEachTag.class);
>> if (forEachTag != null) {
>> return forEachTag.getContext();
>> }
>>
>> // otherwise, create a new context referring to an empty document
>> XPathContext context = new XPathContext(false);
>> VariableStack variableStack = new JSTLVariableStack(pageContext);
>> context.setVarStack(variableStack);
>> int dtm =
>> context.getDTMHandleFromNode(XmlUtil.newEmptyDocument());
>> context.pushCurrentNodeAndExpression(dtm, dtm);
>> return context;
>> }
>> seems to be returning a document fragment but I am not familiar with what
>> a VariableStack is or does. it feels like i can replace everything with
>> jaxa.xml.* but this function needs clarification
>>
>> another question...i don't even use jsp (only jsf) so is there someway to
>> remove or disable it in TomEE and this will avoid the whole issue?
>>
>> On 25/11/2017 18:40, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>
>>> tomcat doesnt, taglib does implicitly
>>>
>>> you can try to hack openejb.classloader properties to make it work -
>>> without any guarantees
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-11-25 17:26 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>
>>>> does tomcat still ship with Xalan as a dependency? if so can we just
>>>> use
>>>> that? i don't really understand what is causing the error. is there
>>>> some
>>>> way i can get the correct instance of DTMManager from the classloader?
>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault
>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.newInstance(DTMManager.java:137)
>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerImpl.<init>(TransformerImpl.java:397)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.xalan.templates.StylesheetRoot.newTransformer(StylesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>
>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> depends the perfs. If javax gives the same no need of xalan, otherwise
>>>>> we would need some flag.
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-11-21 11:52 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> should xalan be available through some route or does everything need
>>>>>> switching to some generic xml parser like javax.xml.xpath.XPath
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:28, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yes, that's the ones to fix - make it compiling + validate perfs are
>>>>>>> still ok.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 11:25 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it is imported in these ones in main as well as loads in test
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:28:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:29:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:26:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:27:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:28:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:24:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:25:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:29:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:30:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:31:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:32:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObjectFactory;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:27:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:28:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:29:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:24:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:25:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:25:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:26:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:27:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XBoolean;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:28:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNodeSet;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:29:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNumber;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:30:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:31:import
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XString;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, you see this stack cause the test cant be loaded but it is in
>>>>>>>>> several classes of taglib project, XalanUtil and a few others.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 11:14 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> so do i need to replace it with something else? is that inside
>>>>>>>>>> ReflectionUtils?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:08, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask
>>>>>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>>>>>> why xalan is not in the name ;))
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> mvn install outputs this:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException:
>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is
>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null
>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>>>>>>>>>>>> Method)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>>>>>>>>>>>> org/apache/xpath/VariableStack
>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93)
>>>>>>>>>>>> ... 9 more
>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>> java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>> sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - compat
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - impl
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - jstlel
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - standard-test
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> output?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if you checkout
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> XPath
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way to go I think.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hi rmannibucau,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continue
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> busy period.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> svn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tree
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IIRC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignored?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'xalan'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <taglib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> optional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remove
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refs?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deploys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deploy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> customer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8.0.0,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Github
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> REST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arqulian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freeze"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> busy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> headers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JAXB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applicable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> encouraged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
sorry i meant javax.xml.*
On 26/11/2017 13:21, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
> not really sure what XalanUtil.getContext is doing
> public static XPathContext getContext(Tag child, PageContext
> pageContext) {
> // if within a forEach tag, use its context
> ForEachTag forEachTag = (ForEachTag)
> TagSupport.findAncestorWithClass(child, ForEachTag.class);
> if (forEachTag != null) {
> return forEachTag.getContext();
> }
>
> // otherwise, create a new context referring to an empty document
> XPathContext context = new XPathContext(false);
> VariableStack variableStack = new JSTLVariableStack(pageContext);
> context.setVarStack(variableStack);
> int dtm =
> context.getDTMHandleFromNode(XmlUtil.newEmptyDocument());
> context.pushCurrentNodeAndExpression(dtm, dtm);
> return context;
> }
> seems to be returning a document fragment but I am not familiar with
> what a VariableStack is or does. it feels like i can replace
> everything with jaxa.xml.* but this function needs clarification
>
> another question...i don't even use jsp (only jsf) so is there someway
> to remove or disable it in TomEE and this will avoid the whole issue?
>
> On 25/11/2017 18:40, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> tomcat doesnt, taglib does implicitly
>>
>> you can try to hack openejb.classloader properties to make it work -
>> without any guarantees
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>
>>
>> 2017-11-25 17:26 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>> does tomcat still ship with Xalan as a dependency? if so can we
>>> just use
>>> that? i don't really understand what is causing the error. is there
>>> some
>>> way i can get the correct instance of DTMManager from the classloader?
>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault
>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.newInstance(DTMManager.java:137)
>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerImpl.<init>(TransformerImpl.java:397)
>>>
>>> at
>>> org.apache.xalan.templates.StylesheetRoot.newTransformer(StylesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/11/2017 11:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>> depends the perfs. If javax gives the same no need of xalan, otherwise
>>>> we would need some flag.
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-11-21 11:52 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>> should xalan be available through some route or does everything need
>>>>> switching to some generic xml parser like javax.xml.xpath.XPath
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:28, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>> yes, that's the ones to fix - make it compiling + validate perfs
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> still ok.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-11-21 11:25 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>> it is imported in these ones in main as well as loads in test
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:28:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:29:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:26:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:27:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:28:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:24:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:25:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:29:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:30:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:31:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:32:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObjectFactory;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:27:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:28:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:29:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:24:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:25:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:25:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:26:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:27:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XBoolean;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:28:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNodeSet;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:29:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNumber;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:30:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:31:import
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XString;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>> No, you see this stack cause the test cant be loaded but it is in
>>>>>>>> several classes of taglib project, XalanUtil and a few others.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 11:14 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>> so do i need to replace it with something else? is that inside
>>>>>>>>> ReflectionUtils?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:08, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't
>>>>>>>>>> ask me
>>>>>>>>>> why xalan is not in the name ;))
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>>>> mvn install outputs this:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException:
>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested
>>>>>>>>>>> exception is
>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null
>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>>>>>>>>>>> Method)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>>>>>>>>>>> org/apache/xpath/VariableStack
>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048)
>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018)
>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ... 9 more
>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in
>>>>>>>>>>>> - compat
>>>>>>>>>>>> - impl
>>>>>>>>>>>> - jstlel
>>>>>>>>>>>> - standard-test
>>>>>>>>>>>> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn
>>>>>>>>>>>> install to
>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> output?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> if you checkout
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a look
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for XPath
>>>>>>>>>>>>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> way to go I think.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hi rmannibucau,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continue
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> busy period.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the svn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tree
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IIRC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignored?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> '.' -e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'xalan'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <taglib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> optional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remove
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refs?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in tomee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to stick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deploys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deploy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> customer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4 is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8.0.0,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can it be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Old
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Github
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> our REST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependency from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4 isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arqulian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adapter with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freeze"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ultra
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> busy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> headers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JAXB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applicable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> days or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> encouraged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
not really sure what XalanUtil.getContext is doing
public static XPathContext getContext(Tag child, PageContext
pageContext) {
// if within a forEach tag, use its context
ForEachTag forEachTag = (ForEachTag)
TagSupport.findAncestorWithClass(child, ForEachTag.class);
if (forEachTag != null) {
return forEachTag.getContext();
}
// otherwise, create a new context referring to an empty document
XPathContext context = new XPathContext(false);
VariableStack variableStack = new JSTLVariableStack(pageContext);
context.setVarStack(variableStack);
int dtm = context.getDTMHandleFromNode(XmlUtil.newEmptyDocument());
context.pushCurrentNodeAndExpression(dtm, dtm);
return context;
}
seems to be returning a document fragment but I am not familiar with
what a VariableStack is or does. it feels like i can replace everything
with jaxa.xml.* but this function needs clarification
another question...i don't even use jsp (only jsf) so is there someway
to remove or disable it in TomEE and this will avoid the whole issue?
On 25/11/2017 18:40, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> tomcat doesnt, taglib does implicitly
>
> you can try to hack openejb.classloader properties to make it work -
> without any guarantees
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>
>
> 2017-11-25 17:26 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>> does tomcat still ship with Xalan as a dependency? if so can we just use
>> that? i don't really understand what is causing the error. is there some
>> way i can get the correct instance of DTMManager from the classloader?
>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault
>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.newInstance(DTMManager.java:137)
>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>> at
>> org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerImpl.<init>(TransformerImpl.java:397)
>> at
>> org.apache.xalan.templates.StylesheetRoot.newTransformer(StylesheetRoot.java:200)
>>
>> On 21/11/2017 11:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>> depends the perfs. If javax gives the same no need of xalan, otherwise
>>> we would need some flag.
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-11-21 11:52 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>> should xalan be available through some route or does everything need
>>>> switching to some generic xml parser like javax.xml.xpath.XPath
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:28, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>> yes, that's the ones to fix - make it compiling + validate perfs are
>>>>> still ok.
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-11-21 11:25 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>> it is imported in these ones in main as well as loads in test
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:28:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:29:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:26:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:27:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:28:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:24:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:25:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:29:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:30:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:31:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:32:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObjectFactory;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:27:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:28:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:29:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:24:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:25:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:25:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:26:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:27:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XBoolean;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:28:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNodeSet;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:29:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNumber;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:30:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:31:import
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XString;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>> No, you see this stack cause the test cant be loaded but it is in
>>>>>>> several classes of taglib project, XalanUtil and a few others.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 11:14 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>> so do i need to replace it with something else? is that inside
>>>>>>>> ReflectionUtils?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:08, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>> That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask me
>>>>>>>>> why xalan is not in the name ;))
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>>> mvn install outputs this:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException:
>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is
>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null
>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>>>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>>>>>>>>>> Method)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>>>>>>>>>> org/apache/xpath/VariableStack
>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048)
>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018)
>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93)
>>>>>>>>>> ... 9 more
>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in
>>>>>>>>>>> - compat
>>>>>>>>>>> - impl
>>>>>>>>>>> - jstlel
>>>>>>>>>>> - standard-test
>>>>>>>>>>> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to
>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> output?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> if you checkout
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath
>>>>>>>>>>>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should
>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> way to go I think.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hi rmannibucau,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> continue
>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> busy period.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tree
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IIRC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignored?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'xalan'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <taglib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> optional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refs?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deploys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arqulian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> busy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> headers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JAXB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applicable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
tomcat doesnt, taglib does implicitly
you can try to hack openejb.classloader properties to make it work -
without any guarantees
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-25 17:26 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
> does tomcat still ship with Xalan as a dependency? if so can we just use
> that? i don't really understand what is causing the error. is there some
> way i can get the correct instance of DTMManager from the classloader?
> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault
> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.newInstance(DTMManager.java:137)
> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:102)
> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:349)
> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:337)
> at
> org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerImpl.<init>(TransformerImpl.java:397)
> at
> org.apache.xalan.templates.StylesheetRoot.newTransformer(StylesheetRoot.java:200)
>
> On 21/11/2017 11:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>> depends the perfs. If javax gives the same no need of xalan, otherwise
>> we would need some flag.
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>
>>
>> 2017-11-21 11:52 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>
>>> should xalan be available through some route or does everything need
>>> switching to some generic xml parser like javax.xml.xpath.XPath
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/11/2017 11:28, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>
>>>> yes, that's the ones to fix - make it compiling + validate perfs are
>>>> still ok.
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-11-21 11:25 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>
>>>>> it is imported in these ones in main as well as loads in test
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:28:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:29:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:26:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:27:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:28:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:24:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:25:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:29:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:30:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:31:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:32:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObjectFactory;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:27:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:28:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:29:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:24:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:25:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:25:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:26:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:27:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XBoolean;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:28:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNodeSet;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:29:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNumber;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:30:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:31:import
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XString;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, you see this stack cause the test cant be loaded but it is in
>>>>>> several classes of taglib project, XalanUtil and a few others.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-11-21 11:14 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so do i need to replace it with something else? is that inside
>>>>>>> ReflectionUtils?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:08, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask me
>>>>>>>> why xalan is not in the name ;))
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> mvn install outputs this:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException:
>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is
>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null
>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>>>>>>>>> Method)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>>>>>>>>> org/apache/xpath/VariableStack
>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048)
>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018)
>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93)
>>>>>>>>> ... 9 more
>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
>>>>>>>>> at java.lang
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in
>>>>>>>>>> - compat
>>>>>>>>>> - impl
>>>>>>>>>> - jstlel
>>>>>>>>>> - standard-test
>>>>>>>>>> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to
>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> output?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> if you checkout
>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath
>>>>>>>>>>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should
>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> way to go I think.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> hi rmannibucau,
>>>>>>>>>>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to
>>>>>>>>>>>> continue
>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> busy period.
>>>>>>>>>>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tree
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IIRC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignored?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'xalan'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <taglib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> optional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refs?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deploys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arqulian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> busy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> headers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JAXB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applicable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
does tomcat still ship with Xalan as a dependency? if so can we just
use that? i don't really understand what is causing the error. is
there some way i can get the correct instance of DTMManager from the
classloader?
java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault
cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.newInstance(DTMManager.java:137)
at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:102)
at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:349)
at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:337)
at
org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerImpl.<init>(TransformerImpl.java:397)
at
org.apache.xalan.templates.StylesheetRoot.newTransformer(StylesheetRoot.java:200)
On 21/11/2017 11:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> depends the perfs. If javax gives the same no need of xalan, otherwise
> we would need some flag.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>
>
> 2017-11-21 11:52 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>> should xalan be available through some route or does everything need
>> switching to some generic xml parser like javax.xml.xpath.XPath
>>
>>
>> On 21/11/2017 11:28, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>> yes, that's the ones to fix - make it compiling + validate perfs are
>>> still ok.
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-11-21 11:25 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>> it is imported in these ones in main as well as loads in test
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:28:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:29:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:26:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:27:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:28:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:24:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:25:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:29:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:30:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:31:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:32:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObjectFactory;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:27:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:28:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:29:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:24:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:25:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:25:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:26:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:27:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XBoolean;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:28:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNodeSet;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:29:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNumber;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:30:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>>
>>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:31:import
>>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XString;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>> No, you see this stack cause the test cant be loaded but it is in
>>>>> several classes of taglib project, XalanUtil and a few others.
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-11-21 11:14 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>> so do i need to replace it with something else? is that inside
>>>>>> ReflectionUtils?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:08, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>> That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask me
>>>>>>> why xalan is not in the name ;))
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>> mvn install outputs this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException:
>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is
>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null
>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>>>>>>>> org/apache/xpath/VariableStack
>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701)
>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048)
>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018)
>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93)
>>>>>>>> ... 9 more
>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack
>>>>>>>> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
>>>>>>>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
>>>>>>>> at java.lang
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in
>>>>>>>>> - compat
>>>>>>>>> - impl
>>>>>>>>> - jstlel
>>>>>>>>> - standard-test
>>>>>>>>> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to
>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> output?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> if you checkout
>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and
>>>>>>>>>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath
>>>>>>>>>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should be
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> way to go I think.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>>>> hi rmannibucau,
>>>>>>>>>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue
>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>> busy period.
>>>>>>>>>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn
>>>>>>>>>>>> tree
>>>>>>>>>>>> IIRC
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignored?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'xalan'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>> .org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <taglib
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> optional
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refs?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> headers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applicable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
depends the perfs. If javax gives the same no need of xalan, otherwise
we would need some flag.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-21 11:52 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
> should xalan be available through some route or does everything need
> switching to some generic xml parser like javax.xml.xpath.XPath
>
>
> On 21/11/2017 11:28, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>> yes, that's the ones to fix - make it compiling + validate perfs are
>> still ok.
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>
>>
>> 2017-11-21 11:25 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>
>>> it is imported in these ones in main as well as loads in test
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:28:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:29:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:26:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:27:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:28:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:24:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:25:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:29:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:30:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:31:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:32:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObjectFactory;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:27:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:28:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:29:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:24:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:25:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:25:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:26:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:27:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XBoolean;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:28:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNodeSet;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:29:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNumber;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:30:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>>>
>>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:31:import
>>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XString;
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/11/2017 11:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No, you see this stack cause the test cant be loaded but it is in
>>>> several classes of taglib project, XalanUtil and a few others.
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-11-21 11:14 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>
>>>>> so do i need to replace it with something else? is that inside
>>>>> ReflectionUtils?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:08, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask me
>>>>>> why xalan is not in the name ;))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mvn install outputs this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException:
>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is
>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null
>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>>>>>>> org/apache/xpath/VariableStack
>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701)
>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048)
>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018)
>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93)
>>>>>>> ... 9 more
>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack
>>>>>>> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
>>>>>>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
>>>>>>> at java.lang
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in
>>>>>>>> - compat
>>>>>>>> - impl
>>>>>>>> - jstlel
>>>>>>>> - standard-test
>>>>>>>> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to
>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> output?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> if you checkout
>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and
>>>>>>>>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath
>>>>>>>>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should be
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> way to go I think.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> hi rmannibucau,
>>>>>>>>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue
>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> busy period.
>>>>>>>>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn
>>>>>>>>>>> tree
>>>>>>>>>>> IIRC
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be
>>>>>>>>>>>> ignored?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e
>>>>>>>>>>>> 'xalan'
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45:
>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>>>>>>>>>>> .org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52:
>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: -
>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7:
>>>>>>>>>>>> <taglib
>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be
>>>>>>>>>>>> optional
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94:
>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove
>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refs?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> headers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applicable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
should xalan be available through some route or does everything need
switching to some generic xml parser like javax.xml.xpath.XPath
On 21/11/2017 11:28, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> yes, that's the ones to fix - make it compiling + validate perfs are still ok.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>
>
> 2017-11-21 11:25 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>> it is imported in these ones in main as well as loads in test
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:28:import
>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:29:import
>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:26:import
>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:27:import
>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:28:import
>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:24:import
>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:25:import
>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:29:import
>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:30:import
>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:31:import
>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:32:import
>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObjectFactory;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:27:import
>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:28:import
>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:29:import
>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:24:import
>> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:25:import
>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:25:import
>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:26:import
>> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:27:import
>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XBoolean;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:28:import
>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNodeSet;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:29:import
>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNumber;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:30:import
>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
>> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:31:import
>> org.apache.xpath.objects.XString;
>>
>>
>> On 21/11/2017 11:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>> No, you see this stack cause the test cant be loaded but it is in
>>> several classes of taglib project, XalanUtil and a few others.
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-11-21 11:14 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>> so do i need to replace it with something else? is that inside
>>>> ReflectionUtils?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21/11/2017 11:08, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>> That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask me
>>>>> why xalan is not in the name ;))
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>> mvn install outputs this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException:
>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is
>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null
>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>>>>>> org/apache/xpath/VariableStack
>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701)
>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048)
>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018)
>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93)
>>>>>> ... 9 more
>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack
>>>>>> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
>>>>>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
>>>>>> at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
>>>>>> at java.lang
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in
>>>>>>> - compat
>>>>>>> - impl
>>>>>>> - jstlel
>>>>>>> - standard-test
>>>>>>> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to check
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> output?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> if you checkout
>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and
>>>>>>>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look to
>>>>>>>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath
>>>>>>>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should be
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> way to go I think.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>> hi rmannibucau,
>>>>>>>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue
>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> busy period.
>>>>>>>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn tree
>>>>>>>>>> IIRC
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be
>>>>>>>>>>> ignored?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e
>>>>>>>>>>> 'xalan'
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="
>>>>>>>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45:
>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>>>>>>>>>> .org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: -
>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7:
>>>>>>>>>>> <taglib
>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: -
>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>>>>>>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be
>>>>>>>>>>> optional
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94:
>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all
>>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>> refs?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applicable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
yes, that's the ones to fix - make it compiling + validate perfs are still ok.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-21 11:25 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
> it is imported in these ones in main as well as loads in test
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:28:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:29:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:26:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:27:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:28:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:24:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:25:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:29:import
> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:30:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:31:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:32:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObjectFactory;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:27:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:28:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:29:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:24:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:25:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:25:import
> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:26:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:27:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XBoolean;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:28:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNodeSet;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:29:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNumber;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:30:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:31:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XString;
>
>
> On 21/11/2017 11:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>> No, you see this stack cause the test cant be loaded but it is in
>> several classes of taglib project, XalanUtil and a few others.
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>
>>
>> 2017-11-21 11:14 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>
>>> so do i need to replace it with something else? is that inside
>>> ReflectionUtils?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/11/2017 11:08, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask me
>>>> why xalan is not in the name ;))
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>
>>>>> mvn install outputs this:
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException:
>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is
>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null
>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>>>>> org/apache/xpath/VariableStack
>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
>>>>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701)
>>>>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048)
>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018)
>>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93)
>>>>> ... 9 more
>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack
>>>>> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
>>>>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
>>>>> at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
>>>>> at java.lang
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in
>>>>>> - compat
>>>>>> - impl
>>>>>> - jstlel
>>>>>> - standard-test
>>>>>> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to check
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> output?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if you checkout
>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and
>>>>>>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look to
>>>>>>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath
>>>>>>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should be
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> way to go I think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> hi rmannibucau,
>>>>>>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue
>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> busy period.
>>>>>>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn tree
>>>>>>>>> IIRC
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be
>>>>>>>>>> ignored?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e
>>>>>>>>>> 'xalan'
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="
>>>>>>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45:
>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>>>>>>>>> .org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: -
>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7:
>>>>>>>>>> <taglib
>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: -
>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>>>>>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be
>>>>>>>>>> optional
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94:
>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all
>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> refs?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applicable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
it is imported in these ones in main as well as loads in test
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:28:import
org.apache.xpath.XPath;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:29:import
org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:26:import
org.apache.xpath.XPath;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:27:import
org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:28:import
org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:24:import
org.apache.xpath.XPath;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:25:import
org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:29:import
org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:30:import
org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:31:import
org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:32:import
org.apache.xpath.objects.XObjectFactory;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:27:import
org.apache.xpath.XPath;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:28:import
org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:29:import
org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:24:import
org.apache.xpath.XPath;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:25:import
org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:25:import
org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:26:import
org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:27:import
org.apache.xpath.objects.XBoolean;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:28:import
org.apache.xpath.objects.XNodeSet;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:29:import
org.apache.xpath.objects.XNumber;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:30:import
org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:31:import
org.apache.xpath.objects.XString;
On 21/11/2017 11:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> No, you see this stack cause the test cant be loaded but it is in
> several classes of taglib project, XalanUtil and a few others.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>
>
> 2017-11-21 11:14 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>> so do i need to replace it with something else? is that inside
>> ReflectionUtils?
>>
>>
>> On 21/11/2017 11:08, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>> That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask me
>>> why xalan is not in the name ;))
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>> mvn install outputs this:
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException:
>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is
>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null
>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103)
>>>> at
>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
>>>> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/xpath/VariableStack
>>>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
>>>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701)
>>>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048)
>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018)
>>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186)
>>>> at
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93)
>>>> ... 9 more
>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack
>>>> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
>>>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
>>>> at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
>>>> at java.lang
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>
>>>>> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in
>>>>> - compat
>>>>> - impl
>>>>> - jstlel
>>>>> - standard-test
>>>>> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test.
>>>>>
>>>>> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to check
>>>>> the
>>>>> output?
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if you checkout
>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and
>>>>>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look to
>>>>>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath
>>>>>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should be the
>>>>>> way to go I think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>> hi rmannibucau,
>>>>>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue
>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> busy period.
>>>>>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn tree
>>>>>>>> IIRC
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be
>>>>>>>>> ignored?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e 'xalan'
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="
>>>>>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45:
>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>>>>>>>> .org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan
>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: -
>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>>>>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be optional
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all
>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>> refs?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
No, you see this stack cause the test cant be loaded but it is in
several classes of taglib project, XalanUtil and a few others.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-21 11:14 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
> so do i need to replace it with something else? is that inside
> ReflectionUtils?
>
>
> On 21/11/2017 11:08, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>> That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask me
>> why xalan is not in the name ;))
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>
>>
>> 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>
>>> mvn install outputs this:
>>>
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException:
>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is
>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null
>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>> at
>>>
>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>> at
>>>
>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>> at
>>>
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>> at
>>>
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>> at
>>>
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>> at
>>>
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
>>> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/xpath/VariableStack
>>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
>>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701)
>>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048)
>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018)
>>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784)
>>> at
>>>
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57)
>>> at
>>>
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64)
>>> at
>>>
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59)
>>> at
>>>
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54)
>>> at
>>>
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51)
>>> at
>>>
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84)
>>> at
>>>
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186)
>>> at
>>>
>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93)
>>> ... 9 more
>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack
>>> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
>>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
>>> at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
>>> at java.lang
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>
>>>> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in
>>>> - compat
>>>> - impl
>>>> - jstlel
>>>> - standard-test
>>>> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test.
>>>>
>>>> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to check
>>>> the
>>>> output?
>>>>
>>>> Matthew
>>>>
>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>>>
>>>>> if you checkout
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and
>>>>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look to
>>>>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath
>>>>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should be the
>>>>> way to go I think.
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hi rmannibucau,
>>>>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue
>>>>>> after
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> busy period.
>>>>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn tree
>>>>>>> IIRC
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be
>>>>>>>> ignored?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e 'xalan'
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="
>>>>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45:
>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>>>>>>> .org/xslt"
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan
>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: -
>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>>>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be optional
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all
>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> refs?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other
>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
so do i need to replace it with something else? is that inside
ReflectionUtils?
On 21/11/2017 11:08, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask me
> why xalan is not in the name ;))
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>
>
> 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>> mvn install outputs this:
>>
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException:
>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is
>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null
>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>> at
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>> at
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
>> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/xpath/VariableStack
>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701)
>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048)
>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018)
>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93)
>> ... 9 more
>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.xpath.VariableStack
>> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
>> at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
>> at java.lang
>>
>>
>> On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>> Hi Romain,
>>>
>>> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in
>>> - compat
>>> - impl
>>> - jstlel
>>> - standard-test
>>> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test.
>>>
>>> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to check the
>>> output?
>>>
>>> Matthew
>>>
>>> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>>
>>>> if you checkout
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and
>>>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look to
>>>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath
>>>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should be the
>>>> way to go I think.
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>> hi rmannibucau,
>>>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue after
>>>>> a
>>>>> busy period.
>>>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn tree IIRC
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be
>>>>>>> ignored?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e 'xalan'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="
>>>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45:
>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>>>>>> .org/xslt"
>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan
>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: -
>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: -
>>>>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be optional in
>>>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all
>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>> refs?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other
>>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib
>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask me
why xalan is not in the name ;))
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
> mvn install outputs this:
>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException:
> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is
> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null
> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/xpath/VariableStack
> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
> at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701)
> at java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048)
> at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018)
> at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93)
> ... 9 more
> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.xpath.VariableStack
> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
> at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
> at java.lang
>
>
> On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>
>> Hi Romain,
>>
>> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in
>> - compat
>> - impl
>> - jstlel
>> - standard-test
>> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test.
>>
>> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to check the
>> output?
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>
>>> if you checkout
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and
>>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look to
>>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath
>>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should be the
>>> way to go I think.
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>
>>>> hi rmannibucau,
>>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue after
>>>> a
>>>> busy period.
>>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn tree IIRC
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be
>>>>>> ignored?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e 'xalan'
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="
>>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45:
>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>>>>> .org/xslt"
>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan
>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: -
>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>> matches
>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>>>> matches
>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: -
>>>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be optional in
>>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all
>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> refs?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other
>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib
>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
mvn install outputs this:
org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException:
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/xpath/VariableStack
at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701)
at java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048)
at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018)
at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93)
... 9 more
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.xpath.VariableStack
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
at java.lang
On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
> Hi Romain,
>
> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in
> - compat
> - impl
> - jstlel
> - standard-test
> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test.
>
> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to check
> the output?
>
> Matthew
>
> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> Hi Matthew,
>>
>> if you checkout
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and
>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look to
>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath
>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should be the
>> way to go I think.
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>
>>
>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>> hi rmannibucau,
>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue
>>> after a
>>> busy period.
>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn tree
>>>> IIRC
>>>>
>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>>>> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be
>>>>> ignored?
>>>>>
>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e 'xalan'
>>>>>
>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>>>>
>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>>
>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>>>>
>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>> xmlns:xalan="
>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45:
>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>>>> .org/xslt"
>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan
>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"
>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>
>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>
>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: -
>>>>> xalan
>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>
>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>
>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>> Binary file
>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>
>>>>> matches
>>>>> Binary file
>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>>> matches
>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: -
>>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>
>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>
>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>> Binary file
>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>>>> Binary file
>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>>>
>>>>> matches
>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>
>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>
>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>>>>
>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>
>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>>>>
>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>>>>
>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>>>>
>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>>>>
>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>>>>
>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>
>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>>>>
>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>>>>
>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>>>>
>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>
>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>>>>
>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>
>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>>>>
>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>>>>
>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be
>>>>> optional in
>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>
>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>>>>
>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>> k>
>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all
>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>> refs?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other
>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib
>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include
>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes, its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.3 to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regressions of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
Hi Romain,
the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in
- compat
- impl
- jstlel
- standard-test
it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test.
would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to check
the output?
Matthew
On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> if you checkout
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and
> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look to
> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath
> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should be the
> way to go I think.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>
>
> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>> hi rmannibucau,
>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue after a
>> busy period.
>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>>
>>
>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn tree IIRC
>>>
>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>>> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be ignored?
>>>>
>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e 'xalan'
>>>>
>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>>
>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib xmlns:xalan="
>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd" version="2.0">
>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45: xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>>> .org/xslt"
>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan
>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd" version="2.0">
>>>>
>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan
>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>
>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>> Binary file
>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>> matches
>>>> Binary file
>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>> matches
>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: -
>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>
>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>> Binary file ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>>> Binary file
>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>> matches
>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>
>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>
>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>
>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>
>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>
>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>
>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>
>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>
>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>
>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>
>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>
>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>
>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be optional in
>>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>
>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>> k>
>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all xalan
>>>>>> refs?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other
>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib folder
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache fop
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development
>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi Matthew,
if you checkout
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and
drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look to
XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath
usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should be the
way to go I think.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
> hi rmannibucau,
> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue after a
> busy period.
> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>
>
> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn tree IIRC
>>
>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>> <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>> a écrit :
>>
>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be ignored?
>>>
>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e 'xalan'
>>>
>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>>>
>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib xmlns:xalan="
>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd" version="2.0">
>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45: xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>> .org/xslt"
>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan
>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd" version="2.0">
>>>
>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan
>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>
>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>> Binary file
>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>> matches
>>> Binary file
>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>> matches
>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: -
>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>
>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>> Binary file ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>> Binary file
>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>> matches
>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>
>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>
>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>
>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>
>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>
>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>
>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>
>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>
>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>
>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>
>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>
>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>
>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be optional in
>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>
>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>
>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes
>>>>
>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>> k>
>>>> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all xalan
>>>>>
>>>>> refs?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other
>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib folder
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache fop
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development
>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am
>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just
>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its
>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
hi rmannibucau,
i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue after
a busy period.
what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn tree IIRC
>
> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead" <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
> a écrit :
>
>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be ignored?
>>
>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e 'xalan'
>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib xmlns:xalan="
>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd" version="2.0">
>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45: xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>> .org/xslt"
>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan
>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd" version="2.0">
>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan
>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>> Binary file ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>> matches
>> Binary file ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>> matches
>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: -
>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>> Binary file ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>> Binary file ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>> matches
>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>> * [lifted from xalan]
>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be optional in
>> maven-bundle-plugin
>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>> * [lifted from xalan]
>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>
>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>>> Yes
>>>
>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead" <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>> k>
>>> a écrit :
>>>
>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all xalan
>>>> refs?
>>>>
>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>
>>>>> :
>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other
>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib folder -
>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp. Romain
>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache fop
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE
>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development
>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running
>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just keep
>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its
>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one
>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn tree IIRC
Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead" <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
a écrit :
> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be ignored?
>
> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e 'xalan'
> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib xmlns:xalan="
> http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd" version="2.0">
> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45: xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
> .org/xslt"
> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan
> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd" version="2.0">
> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan
> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
> Binary file ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
> matches
> Binary file ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
> matches
> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: -
> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
> Binary file ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
> Binary file ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
> matches
> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
> * [lifted from xalan]
> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be optional in
> maven-bundle-plugin
> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
> * [lifted from xalan]
> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>
> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>> Yes
>>
>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead" <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>> k>
>> a écrit :
>>
>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all xalan
>>> refs?
>>>
>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>
>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>
>>>> :
>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>> k>
>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other
>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>
>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib folder -
>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp. Romain
>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache fop
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE
>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development
>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just keep
>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its
>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't
>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I
>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so
>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one
>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be ignored?
Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e 'xalan'
./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd" version="2.0">
./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45:
xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan
xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd" version="2.0">
./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
- xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: -
xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
- xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
Binary file
./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
matches
Binary file
./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip matches
./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: -
xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
- xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
- xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
Binary file
./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar
matches
Binary file
./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
matches
./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
- xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
<groupId>xalan</groupId>
./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
<artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
<groupId>xalan</groupId>
./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
<artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
* [lifted from xalan]
./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
<groupId>xalan</groupId>
./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
<artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
- xalan-2.7.1.jar
./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
- xalan-2.7.1.jar
./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
<groupId>xalan</groupId>
./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
<artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be optional in
maven-bundle-plugin
./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
* [lifted from xalan]
./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar
./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Yes
>
> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead" <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
> a écrit :
>
>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all xalan
>> refs?
>>
>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>
>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>
>>>> :
>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>> k>
>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other versions
>>>>>
>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib folder -
>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp. Romain
>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache fop in
>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE stack
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development
>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running it
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just keep
>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its
>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't
>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I
>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so if
>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Yes
Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead" <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
a écrit :
> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all xalan
> refs?
>
> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>
>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>
>>> :
>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>
>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>> k>
>>>> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other versions
>>>>
>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep
>>>>>
>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib folder -
>>>>>> fop
>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>> k>
>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>
>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp. Romain
>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache fop in
>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE stack
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development
>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running it
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just keep
>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its
>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I
>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so if
>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all xalan refs?
On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>
> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>> :
>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>
>>
>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>
>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead" <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>> k>
>>> a écrit :
>>>
>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other versions
>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>
>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yep
>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib folder -
>>>>> fop
>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>> k>
>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>
>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault
>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.StylesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp. Romain said
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache fop in
>>>>>> one
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE stack
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development setup.
>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running it
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just keep
>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its those
>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't be
>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I
>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so if
>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk
>:
> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>
>
> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>
>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead" <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>> k>
>> a écrit :
>>
>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other versions
>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>
>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>
>>> Yep
>>>>
>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib folder -
>>>> fop
>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>
>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>> <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>> k>
>>>> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>
>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault
>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>> 7)
>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.StylesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>
>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp. Romain said
>>>>> it
>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache fop in
>>>>> one
>>>>> of
>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE stack
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development setup.
>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running it
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just keep
>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its those
>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't be
>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I
>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so if
>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> >:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <andy.is@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>
> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead" <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
> a écrit :
>
>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other versions
>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>
>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>>> Yep
>>>
>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib folder - fop
>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>
>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead" <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>>> k>
>>> a écrit :
>>>
>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault
>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.newInstance(DTMManager.java:137)
>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.StylesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>
>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp. Romain said
>>>> it
>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache fop in one
>>>> of
>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE stack
>>>>
>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>> Jon
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>
>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development setup.
>>>>>> So
>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running it on
>>>>>> my
>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just keep
>>>>>> working
>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its those
>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't be
>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I believe). I
>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so if
>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my
>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead" <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
a écrit :
> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other versions
> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>
> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>> Yep
>>
>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib folder - fop
>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>
>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead" <matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.u
>> k>
>> a écrit :
>>
>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault
>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.newInstance(DTMManager.java:137)
>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.StylesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>
>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp. Romain said
>>> it
>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache fop in one
>>> of
>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE stack
>>>
>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>
>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>
>>>> Jon
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>
>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development setup.
>>>>> So
>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running it on
>>>>> my
>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>
>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just keep
>>>>> working
>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its those
>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't be
>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I believe). I
>>>>>> think
>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so if
>>>>>> you're
>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> >:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my
>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented
>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to
>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other versions
of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Yep
>
> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib folder - fop
> is not particular since xalan is very common
>
> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead" <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
> a écrit :
>
>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault
>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.newInstance(DTMManager.java:137)
>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>> merImpl.java:397)
>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.StylesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>
>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp. Romain said it
>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache fop in one of
>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE stack
>>
>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>
>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>
>>> Jon
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jon,
>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development setup. So
>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running it on my
>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>
>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just keep working
>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>
>>>> Matthew
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its those
>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't be
>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I believe). I
>>>>> think
>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so if you're
>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jon
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>
>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version
>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version
>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the
>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and
>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested
>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding
>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Yep
It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib folder - fop
is not particular since xalan is very common
Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead" <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
a écrit :
> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault
> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.newInstance(DTMManager.java:137)
> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:102)
> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:349)
> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:337)
> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
> merImpl.java:397)
> at org.apache.xalan.templates.StylesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>
> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp. Romain said it
> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache fop in one of
> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE stack
>
> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>
>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jon,
>>>
>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development setup. So
>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running it on my
>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>
>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just keep working
>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>
>>> Matthew
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its those
>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't be
>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I believe). I
>>>> think
>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so if you're
>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually.
>>>>
>>>> Jon
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>
>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version
>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version
>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> >:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services
>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in
>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but
>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the
>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and
>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fkjaekel@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
with 7.0.4 i am getting this
java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault
cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.newInstance(DTMManager.java:137)
at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:102)
at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:349)
at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:337)
at
org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerImpl.<init>(TransformerImpl.java:397)
at
org.apache.xalan.templates.StylesheetRoot.newTransformer(StylesheetRoot.java:200)
with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp. Romain said
it was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache fop in
one of my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE stack
On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development setup. So
>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running it on my
>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>
>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just keep working
>> and report back if there are any issues
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>>
>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its those
>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't be
>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I believe). I
>>> think
>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so if you're
>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually.
>>>
>>> Jon
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>
>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>> strub
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>> :
>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian
>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version
>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version
>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in
>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but
>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version
>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current
>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run
>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is
>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+
>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the
>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested
>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
Jon
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development setup. So
> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running it on my
> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>
> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just keep working
> and report back if there are any issues
>
> Matthew
>
>
> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its those
>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't be
>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I believe). I
>> think
>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so if you're
>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks!
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>
>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>>
>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>
>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>> >:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian
>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version
>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version
>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations
>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in
>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but
>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version
>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current
>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run
>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is
>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3tal@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> >:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the
>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This
>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
Hi Jon,
That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development setup.
So I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running it
on my local machine in place of 7.0.3.
It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just keep working
and report back if there are any issues
Matthew
On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> Hi
>
> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its those
> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't be
> deployed here (they'll go to here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I believe). I think
> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so if you're
> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually.
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
> matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>
>>
>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks!
>>>
>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>
>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>> :
>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>
>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian
>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version
>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version -->
>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere on
>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check the
>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations
>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in
>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but it's
>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version -->
>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current
>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is
>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+
>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the
>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested
>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
Hi
That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its those
binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't be
deployed here (they'll go to here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I believe). I think
there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so if you're
waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually.
Jon
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
matthew.broadhead@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>
>
> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
>> Hi folks!
>>
>> Sorry for the delay!
>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>
>> txs and LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>> >:
>>>
>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>
>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>
>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Alexandre
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>
>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>> repo>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>
>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>
>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian
>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version
>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version -->
>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere on
>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>> >:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check the
>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations
>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in
>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but it's
>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>
>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version -->
>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current
>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>
>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run
>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the
>>>>
>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is
>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>
>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>
>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>
>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>
>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>
>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>
>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>
>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>
>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>
>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>
>>>>> you
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
are the dist builds still at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Sorry for the delay!
> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
> Will ping back once I know more.
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>
>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi Romain,
>>>
>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Alexandre
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>
>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>> repo>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian
>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>
>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>> <repository>
>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>> </repository>
>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>
>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>
>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version
>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>
>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-embedded</artifactId>
>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version -->
>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>
>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere on
>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check the
>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations
>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in TomEE
>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but it's
>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version -->
>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current
>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give
>>> feedback
>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run my
>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using
>>> the
>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is an
>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1
>>> based on
>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+
>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+
>>> binding
>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the
>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and
>>> checking
>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always
>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your
>>> help
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested
>>> all
>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4
>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9,
>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as
>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding
>>> (At
>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
>>> Thank
>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>.
Hi folks!
Sorry for the delay!
Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
Will ping back once I know more.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>
> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Romain,
>>
>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>> repo>
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>> rmannibucau> |
>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>
>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian
>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>
>>>> <repositories>
>>>> <repository>
>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>> </repository>
>>>> </repositories>
>>>>
>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>
>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version
>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>
>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>> <dependency>
>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-embedded</artifactId>
>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version -->
>>>> </dependency>
>>>>
>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere on
>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Alexandre
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check the
>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations
>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in TomEE
>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but it's
>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version -->
>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current
>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give
>> feedback
>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run my
>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using
>> the
>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is an
>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1
>> based on
>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+
>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+
>> binding
>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the
>>>> moment,
>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and
>> checking
>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always
>>>> takes
>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your
>> help
>>>> and
>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested
>> all
>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4
>> is
>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9,
>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as
>> much
>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding
>> (At
>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
>> Thank
>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
(openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Romain,
>
> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>
> Best regards,
> Alexandre
>
>
> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > you can set as system property (through surefire)
> > openejb.deployer.repository=<the
> > repo>
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
> >
> > 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Hi Romain,
> >>
> >> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian
> >> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
> >>
> >> <repositories>
> >> <repository>
> >> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
> >> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
> >> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
> >> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
> >> </repository>
> >> </repositories>
> >>
> >> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
> >>
> >> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
> >> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version
> >> which isn't yet officialized?
> >>
> >> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
> >> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
> >> <dependency>
> >> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
> >> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-embedded</artifactId>
> >> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version -->
> >> </dependency>
> >>
> >> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere on
> >> tomee.apache.org?)
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Alexandre
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> >> > @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
> >> > content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> >> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> >> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> >> rmannibucau> |
> >> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
> >> >
> >> > 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> >> Hello,
> >> >>
> >> >> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check the
> >> >> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations
> >> >> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in TomEE
> >> >> + 7.x).
> >> >>
> >> >> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but it's
> >> >> not being resolved:
> >> >> <dependency>
> >> >> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
> >> >> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
> embedded</artifactId>
> >> >> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version -->
> >> >> </dependency>
> >> >>
> >> >> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
> >> >>
> >> >> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current
> >> >> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give
> feedback
> >> >> on this RC before it's final.
> >> >>
> >> >> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run my
> >> >> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using
> the
> >> >> embedded adapter* ?
> >> >>
> >> >> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is an
> >> >> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
> >> >>
> >> >> Best regards,
> >> >> Alexandre
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> > Hello Andy,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1
> based on
> >> >> > my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+
> 7.0.4
> >> >> > vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Best regards,
> >> >> > Alexandre
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
> >> >> >> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+
> binding
> >> >> votes.
> >> >> >> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the
> >> moment,
> >> >> so I
> >> >> >> don't expect to get a response until next week.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and
> checking
> >> >> them
> >> >> >> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
> >> >> >> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always
> >> takes
> >> >> >> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your
> help
> >> and
> >> >> >> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested
> all
> >> >> your
> >> >> >> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Andy Gumbrecht.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> +1
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Hello Andy
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4
> is
> >> >> >>> supposed to last?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Best regards,
> >> >> >>> Alex
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> +1
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
> >> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Hi Everyone,
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
> >> place
> >> >> >>>>> your
> >> >> >>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9,
> >> which is
> >> >> >>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Staging repo:
> >> >> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> >> orgapachetomee-1107/
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Source zip:
> >> >> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> >> >> >>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
> >> >> >>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Dist area:
> >> >> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
> >> >> tomee-7.0.4/
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Legal:
> >> >> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
> >> >> >>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Keys:
> >> >> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Changelog:
> >> >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> >> >> >>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Green buildbot:
> >> >> >>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
> jvm8/builds/725
> >> >> >>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Please vote:
> >> >> >>>>> +1: Release
> >> >> >>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
> >> >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as
> much
> >> >> >>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding
> (At
> >> >> least 3
> >> >> >>>>> binding votes).
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
> Thank
> >> you
> >> >> >>>>> very
> >> >> >>>>> much for your time.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>.
Hi Romain,
But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
Best regards,
Alexandre
2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Alex,
>
> you can set as system property (through surefire)
> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
> repo>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>
> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Romain,
>>
>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian
>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>
>> <repositories>
>> <repository>
>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>> </repository>
>> </repositories>
>>
>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>
>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version
>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>
>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-embedded</artifactId>
>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version -->
>> </dependency>
>>
>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere on
>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>> > @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>> > content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>> >
>> >
>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>> rmannibucau> |
>> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>> >
>> > 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check the
>> >> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations
>> >> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in TomEE
>> >> + 7.x).
>> >>
>> >> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but it's
>> >> not being resolved:
>> >> <dependency>
>> >> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>> >> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-embedded</artifactId>
>> >> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version -->
>> >> </dependency>
>> >>
>> >> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
>> >>
>> >> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current
>> >> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give feedback
>> >> on this RC before it's final.
>> >>
>> >> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run my
>> >> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using the
>> >> embedded adapter* ?
>> >>
>> >> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is an
>> >> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>> >>
>> >> Best regards,
>> >> Alexandre
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>> >> > Hello Andy,
>> >> >
>> >> > And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1 based on
>> >> > my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+ 7.0.4
>> >> > vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>> >> >
>> >> > I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>> >> >
>> >> > Best regards,
>> >> > Alexandre
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
>> >> >> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+ binding
>> >> votes.
>> >> >> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the
>> moment,
>> >> so I
>> >> >> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and checking
>> >> them
>> >> >> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
>> >> >> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always
>> takes
>> >> >> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your help
>> and
>> >> >> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested all
>> >> your
>> >> >> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Andy Gumbrecht.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> +1
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Hello Andy
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4 is
>> >> >>> supposed to last?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Best regards,
>> >> >>> Alex
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> +1
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>> Hi Everyone,
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
>> place
>> >> >>>>> your
>> >> >>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9,
>> which is
>> >> >>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Staging repo:
>> >> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> >> orgapachetomee-1107/
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Source zip:
>> >> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>> >> >>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>> >> >>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Dist area:
>> >> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>> >> tomee-7.0.4/
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Legal:
>> >> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>> >> >>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Keys:
>> >> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Changelog:
>> >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>> >> >>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Green buildbot:
>> >> >>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
>> >> >>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Please vote:
>> >> >>>>> +1: Release
>> >> >>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>> >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
>> >> >>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At
>> >> least 3
>> >> >>>>> binding votes).
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank
>> you
>> >> >>>>> very
>> >> >>>>> much for your time.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi Alex,
you can set as system property (through surefire)
openejb.deployer.repository=<the
repo>
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Romain,
>
> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian
> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>
> <repositories>
> <repository>
> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
> </repository>
> </repositories>
>
> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>
> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version
> which isn't yet officialized?
>
> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-embedded</artifactId>
> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version -->
> </dependency>
>
> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere on
> tomee.apache.org?)
>
> Best regards,
> Alexandre
>
>
>
> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> > @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
> > content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
> >
> > 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check the
> >> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations
> >> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in TomEE
> >> + 7.x).
> >>
> >> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but it's
> >> not being resolved:
> >> <dependency>
> >> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
> >> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-embedded</artifactId>
> >> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version -->
> >> </dependency>
> >>
> >> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
> >>
> >> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current
> >> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give feedback
> >> on this RC before it's final.
> >>
> >> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run my
> >> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using the
> >> embedded adapter* ?
> >>
> >> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is an
> >> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Alexandre
> >>
> >>
> >> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
> >> > Hello Andy,
> >> >
> >> > And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1 based on
> >> > my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+ 7.0.4
> >> > vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
> >> >
> >> > I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
> >> >
> >> > Best regards,
> >> > Alexandre
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
> >> >> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+ binding
> >> votes.
> >> >> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the
> moment,
> >> so I
> >> >> don't expect to get a response until next week.
> >> >>
> >> >> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and checking
> >> them
> >> >> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
> >> >> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always
> takes
> >> >> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your help
> and
> >> >> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested all
> >> your
> >> >> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
> >> >>
> >> >> Andy Gumbrecht.
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
> >> >>
> >> >> +1
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hello Andy
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4 is
> >> >>> supposed to last?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Best regards,
> >> >>> Alex
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> +1
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Hi Everyone,
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
> place
> >> >>>>> your
> >> >>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9,
> which is
> >> >>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Staging repo:
> >> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> orgapachetomee-1107/
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Source zip:
> >> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> >> >>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
> >> >>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Dist area:
> >> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
> >> tomee-7.0.4/
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Legal:
> >> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
> >> >>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Keys:
> >> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Changelog:
> >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> >> >>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Green buildbot:
> >> >>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
> >> >>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Please vote:
> >> >>>>> +1: Release
> >> >>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
> >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
> >> >>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At
> >> least 3
> >> >>>>> binding votes).
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank
> you
> >> >>>>> very
> >> >>>>> much for your time.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>.
Hi Romain,
Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian
test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
<repositories>
<repository>
<id>my-tomee704repo</id>
<name>TomEE704 repo</name>
<url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
</repository>
</repositories>
(and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version
which isn't yet officialized?
For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository
does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
<artifactId>arquillian-tomee-embedded</artifactId>
<version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version -->
</dependency>
So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere on
tomee.apache.org?)
Best regards,
Alexandre
2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>
> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check the
>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations
>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in TomEE
>> + 7.x).
>>
>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but it's
>> not being resolved:
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-embedded</artifactId>
>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version -->
>> </dependency>
>>
>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
>>
>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current
>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give feedback
>> on this RC before it's final.
>>
>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run my
>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using the
>> embedded adapter* ?
>>
>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is an
>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>> > Hello Andy,
>> >
>> > And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1 based on
>> > my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+ 7.0.4
>> > vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>> >
>> > I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Alexandre
>> >
>> >
>> > 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
>> >> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+ binding
>> votes.
>> >> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the moment,
>> so I
>> >> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>> >>
>> >> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and checking
>> them
>> >> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
>> >> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always takes
>> >> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your help and
>> >> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested all
>> your
>> >> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>> >>
>> >> Andy Gumbrecht.
>> >>
>> >> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hello Andy
>> >>>
>> >>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4 is
>> >>> supposed to last?
>> >>>
>> >>> Best regards,
>> >>> Alex
>> >>>
>> >>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> +1
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Hi Everyone,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place
>> >>>>> your
>> >>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
>> >>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Staging repo:
>> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Source zip:
>> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>> >>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>> >>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Dist area:
>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>> tomee-7.0.4/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Legal:
>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>> >>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Keys:
>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Changelog:
>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>> >>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Green buildbot:
>> >>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
>> >>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Please vote:
>> >>>>> +1: Release
>> >>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
>> >>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At
>> least 3
>> >>>>> binding votes).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you
>> >>>>> very
>> >>>>> much for your time.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
+1
Thanks Andy
Le 8 oct. 2017 10:51, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rm...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>
> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check the
> > impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations
> > sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in TomEE
> > + 7.x).
> >
> > I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but it's
> > not being resolved:
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
> > <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-embedded</artifactId>
> > <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version -->
> > </dependency>
> >
> > I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
> >
> > But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current
> > TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give feedback
> > on this RC before it's final.
> >
> > What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run my
> > Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using the
> > embedded adapter* ?
> >
> > (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is an
> > alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Alexandre
> >
> >
> > 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
> > > Hello Andy,
> > >
> > > And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1 based on
> > > my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+ 7.0.4
> > > vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
> > >
> > > I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Alexandre
> > >
> > >
> > > 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
> > >> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+ binding
> > votes.
> > >> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the
> moment,
> > so I
> > >> don't expect to get a response until next week.
> > >>
> > >> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and checking
> > them
> > >> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
> > >> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always
> takes
> > >> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your help
> and
> > >> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested all
> > your
> > >> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
> > >>
> > >> Andy Gumbrecht.
> > >>
> > >> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
> > >>
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hello Andy
> > >>>
> > >>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4 is
> > >>> supposed to last?
> > >>>
> > >>> Best regards,
> > >>> Alex
> > >>>
> > >>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
> >:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi Everyone,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
> place
> > >>>>> your
> > >>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which
> is
> > >>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Staging repo:
> > >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapachetomee-1107/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Source zip:
> > >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> > >>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
> > >>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Dist area:
> > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
> > tomee-7.0.4/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Legal:
> > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
> > >>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Keys:
> > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Changelog:
> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> > >>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Green buildbot:
> > >>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
> > >>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please vote:
> > >>>>> +1: Release
> > >>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
> > >>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At
> > least 3
> > >>>>> binding votes).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank
> you
> > >>>>> very
> > >>>>> much for your time.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
@Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>
> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check the
> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations
> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in TomEE
> + 7.x).
>
> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but it's
> not being resolved:
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-embedded</artifactId>
> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version -->
> </dependency>
>
> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
>
> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current
> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give feedback
> on this RC before it's final.
>
> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run my
> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using the
> embedded adapter* ?
>
> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is an
> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>
> Best regards,
> Alexandre
>
>
> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
> > Hello Andy,
> >
> > And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1 based on
> > my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+ 7.0.4
> > vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
> >
> > I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Alexandre
> >
> >
> > 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
> >> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+ binding
> votes.
> >> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the moment,
> so I
> >> don't expect to get a response until next week.
> >>
> >> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and checking
> them
> >> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
> >> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always takes
> >> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your help and
> >> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested all
> your
> >> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
> >>
> >> Andy Gumbrecht.
> >>
> >> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello Andy
> >>>
> >>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4 is
> >>> supposed to last?
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Alex
> >>>
> >>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Everyone,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place
> >>>>> your
> >>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
> >>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Staging repo:
> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachetomee-1107/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Source zip:
> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> >>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
> >>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dist area:
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
> tomee-7.0.4/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Legal:
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
> >>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Keys:
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Changelog:
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> >>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Green buildbot:
> >>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
> >>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please vote:
> >>>>> +1: Release
> >>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
> >>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At
> least 3
> >>>>> binding votes).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you
> >>>>> very
> >>>>> much for your time.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check the
impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations
sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in TomEE
+ 7.x).
I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but it's
not being resolved:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
<artifactId>arquillian-tomee-embedded</artifactId>
<version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version -->
</dependency>
I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized.
But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current
TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give feedback
on this RC before it's final.
What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run my
Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using the
embedded adapter* ?
(I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is an
alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
Best regards,
Alexandre
2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>:
> Hello Andy,
>
> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1 based on
> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+ 7.0.4
> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>
> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>
> Best regards,
> Alexandre
>
>
> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+ binding votes.
>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the moment, so I
>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>
>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and checking them
>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always takes
>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>>
>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your help and
>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested all your
>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>
>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>
>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Andy
>>>
>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4 is
>>> supposed to last?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place
>>>>> your
>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>
>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>>>
>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>>>
>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>
>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>
>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>
>>>>> Legal:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>
>>>>> Keys:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>
>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>
>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At least 3
>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>
>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you
>>>>> very
>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>.
Hello Andy,
And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1 based on
my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+ 7.0.4
vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
Best regards,
Alexandre
2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+ binding votes.
> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the moment, so I
> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>
> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and checking them
> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always takes
> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>
> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your help and
> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested all your
> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>
> Andy Gumbrecht.
>
> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>
> +1
>
>
>
> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>
>> Hello Andy
>>
>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4 is
>> supposed to last?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alex
>>
>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place
>>>> your
>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>
>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>>
>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>>
>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Staging repo:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>
>>>> Source zip:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>
>>>> Dist area:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>
>>>> Legal:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>
>>>> Keys:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> Changelog:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>
>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>
>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>
>>>> Please vote:
>>>> +1: Release
>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>
>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At least 3
>>>> binding votes).
>>>>
>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you
>>>> very
>>>> much for your time.
>>>>
>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>
>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>.
The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+ binding
votes. I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the
moment, so I don't expect to get a response until next week.
The review process is basically downloading the binaries and checking
them for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing
everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always takes
time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your help and
votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested all
your environments. The more eyes on, the better!
Andy Gumbrecht.
I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
+1
On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
> Hello Andy
>
> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4 is
> supposed to last?
>
> Best regards,
> Alex
>
> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
>> +1
>>
>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place your
>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>
>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>
>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>
>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>
>>>
>>> Staging repo:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>
>>> Source zip:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>
>>> Dist area:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>>>
>>> Legal:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>
>>> Keys:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>
>>> Changelog:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>
>>> Green buildbot:
>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>
>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>
>>> Please vote:
>>> +1: Release
>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>
>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At least 3
>>> binding votes).
>>>
>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you very
>>> much for your time.
>>>
>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
it said 3 days in the email. until the 1st october i guess
+1 (non binding) if it is still open
although i am not involved in fixing the outstanding jaxb issues
On 04/10/2017 09:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
> Hello Andy
>
> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4 is
> supposed to last?
>
> Best regards,
> Alex
>
> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
>> +1
>>
>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place your
>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>
>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>
>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>
>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>
>>>
>>> Staging repo:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>
>>> Source zip:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>
>>> Dist area:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>>>
>>> Legal:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>
>>> Keys:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>
>>> Changelog:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>
>>> Green buildbot:
>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>
>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>
>>> Please vote:
>>> +1: Release
>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>
>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At least 3
>>> binding votes).
>>>
>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you very
>>> much for your time.
>>>
>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>.
Hello Andy
Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4 is
supposed to last?
Best regards,
Alex
2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place your
>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>
>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>
>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>
>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>>
>> Source zip:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>
>> Dist area:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>>
>> Legal:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>
>> Keys:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>
>> Changelog:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>
>> Green buildbot:
>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>
>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>
>> Please vote:
>> +1: Release
>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>
>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>
>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At least 3
>> binding votes).
>>
>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you very
>> much for your time.
>>
>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Felipe Jaekel <fk...@gmail.com>.
+1
2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place your
> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>
> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>
> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>
> --add-module java.xml.bind
>
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>
> Source zip:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>
> Dist area:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>
> Legal:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>
> Keys:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>
> Changelog:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>
> Green buildbot:
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>
> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>
> Please vote:
> +1: Release
> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>
> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>
> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At least 3
> binding votes).
>
> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you very
> much for your time.
>
> Andy Gumbrecht.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>.
It's not even dry off the press yet, so it's a little early. We'll see
it in the next release of TomEE.
Andy
On 26/09/17 22:48, Svetlin Zarev wrote:
> +0
>
> It would be great if the tomcat dependency is updated to 8.5.21 because of
> the fixed regressions with the SSL configuration
>
> Kind regadrs,
> Svetlin
>
> 2017-09-27 0:24 GMT+03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place your
>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>
>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>
>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>
>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>>
>> Source zip:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>
>> Dist area:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>>
>> Legal:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>
>> Keys:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>
>> Changelog:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>
>> Green buildbot:
>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>
>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>
>> Please vote:
>> +1: Release
>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>
>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>
>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At least 3
>> binding votes).
>>
>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you very
>> much for your time.
>>
>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Svetlin Zarev <sv...@gmail.com>.
+0
It would be great if the tomcat dependency is updated to 8.5.21 because of
the fixed regressions with the SSL configuration
Kind regadrs,
Svetlin
2017-09-27 0:24 GMT+03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place your
> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>
> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>
> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>
> --add-module java.xml.bind
>
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>
> Source zip:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>
> Dist area:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>
> Legal:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>
> Keys:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>
> Changelog:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>
> Green buildbot:
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>
> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>
> Please vote:
> +1: Release
> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>
> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>
> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At least 3
> binding votes).
>
> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you very
> much for your time.
>
> Andy Gumbrecht.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2 [PASSED]
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>.
And here my late +1.
All internal tests and apps r still running.
txs for rolling the release train!
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 09.10.2017 um 22:39 schrieb Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>:
>
> OK folks, that's a wrap. Three binding votes close this one and we'll release.
>
> Any issues will now go out in the next release.
>
> Thanks guys.
>
> +1
>
> Alexandre (Alex The Rocker)
> Felipe Jaekel
> Andy Gumbrecht *
> Jean-Louis Monteiro *
> Jonathan Gallimore *
>
> +0
>
> Svetlin Zarev
>
> -1
>
> None
>
>
> On 09/10/17 12:49, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place your
>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>
>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>
>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>
>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>
>>>
>>> Staging repo:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>
>>> Source zip:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>
>>> Dist area:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>>>
>>> Legal:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>
>>> Keys:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>
>>> Changelog:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>
>>> Green buildbot:
>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>
>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>
>>> Please vote:
>>> +1: Release
>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>
>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At least 3
>>> binding votes).
>>>
>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you very
>>> much for your time.
>>>
>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2 [PASSED]
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
Thanks Andy. 7.0.4 is running fine on my development machine so far
+1
On 09/10/2017 22:39, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
> OK folks, that's a wrap. Three binding votes close this one and we'll
> release.
>
> Any issues will now go out in the next release.
>
> Thanks guys.
>
> +1
>
> Alexandre (Alex The Rocker)
> Felipe Jaekel
> Andy Gumbrecht *
> Jean-Louis Monteiro *
> Jonathan Gallimore *
>
> +0
>
> Svetlin Zarev
>
> -1
>
> None
>
>
> On 09/10/17 12:49, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Andy Gumbrecht
>> <ag...@tomitribe.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
>>> place your
>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>
>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>
>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>
>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>
>>>
>>> Staging repo:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>
>>> Source zip:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>
>>> Dist area:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>>>
>>> Legal:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>
>>> Keys:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>
>>> Changelog:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>
>>> Green buildbot:
>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>
>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>
>>> Please vote:
>>> +1: Release
>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>
>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At
>>> least 3
>>> binding votes).
>>>
>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank
>>> you very
>>> much for your time.
>>>
>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>
>>>
>
[VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2 [PASSED]
Posted by Andy Gumbrecht <an...@gmx.de>.
OK folks, that's a wrap. Three binding votes close this one and we'll
release.
Any issues will now go out in the next release.
Thanks guys.
+1
Alexandre (Alex The Rocker)
Felipe Jaekel
Andy Gumbrecht *
Jean-Louis Monteiro *
Jonathan Gallimore *
+0
Svetlin Zarev
-1
None
On 09/10/17 12:49, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> +1
>
> Jon
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place your
>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>
>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>
>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>
>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>>
>> Source zip:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>
>> Dist area:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>>
>> Legal:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>
>> Keys:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>
>> Changelog:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>
>> Green buildbot:
>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>
>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>
>> Please vote:
>> +1: Release
>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>
>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>
>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At least 3
>> binding votes).
>>
>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you very
>> much for your time.
>>
>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
+1
Jon
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place your
> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>
> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>
> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>
> --add-module java.xml.bind
>
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>
> Source zip:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>
> Dist area:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>
> Legal:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>
> Keys:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>
> Changelog:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>
> Green buildbot:
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>
> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>
> Please vote:
> +1: Release
> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>
> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>
> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At least 3
> binding votes).
>
> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you very
> much for your time.
>
> Andy Gumbrecht.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2 [RESULT][PASSED]
Posted by Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>.
Great job Andy, thanks!
Alexandre
2017-10-09 23:26 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
> For the list...
>
>
> On 28/09/17 01:01, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>
>> This has just reminded me that i am currently stuck on
>> java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.131-11.b12.el7.x86_64
>> on CentOS 7 with TomEE 7.0.3
>> updating to
>> Version : 1.8.0.144
>> Release : 0.b01.el7_4
>> results in random freezes with no error in catalina.out
>>
>> On 27/09/2017 20:10, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>
>>> Tested this TomEE+ 7.0.4 RC with our various web apps on Linux Redhat
>>> 6.5 with Java 8 update 144.
>>> Using JAX-RS (with Johnzon specifics), JAX-WS, JMS
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alexandre
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-09-26 23:24 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place
>>>> your
>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>
>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>>
>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>>
>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Staging repo:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>
>>>> Source zip:
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>
>>>> Dist area:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>
>>>> Legal:
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>
>>>> Keys:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> Changelog:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>
>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>
>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>
>>>> Please vote:
>>>> +1: Release
>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>
>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
>>>> information
>>>> as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At least 3
>>>> binding votes).
>>>>
>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you
>>>> very
>>>> much for your time.
>>>>
>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2 [RESULT][PASSED]
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
ok i have sent to users@tomee.apache.org
On 09/10/2017 23:26, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
> For the list...
>
>
> On 28/09/17 01:01, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>> This has just reminded me that i am currently stuck on
>> java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.131-11.b12.el7.x86_64
>> on CentOS 7 with TomEE 7.0.3
>> updating to
>> Version : 1.8.0.144
>> Release : 0.b01.el7_4
>> results in random freezes with no error in catalina.out
>>
>> On 27/09/2017 20:10, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>
>>> Tested this TomEE+ 7.0.4 RC with our various web apps on Linux Redhat
>>> 6.5 with Java 8 update 144.
>>> Using JAX-RS (with Johnzon specifics), JAX-WS, JMS
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alexandre
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-09-26 23:24 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
>>>> place your
>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>
>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>>
>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>>
>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Staging repo:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Source zip:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dist area:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>
>>>> Legal:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Keys:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> Changelog:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>
>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>
>>>> Please vote:
>>>> +1: Release
>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>
>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
>>>> information
>>>> as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At
>>>> least 3
>>>> binding votes).
>>>>
>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank
>>>> you very
>>>> much for your time.
>>>>
>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>
>>
>
[VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2 [RESULT][PASSED]
Posted by Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>.
For the list...
On 28/09/17 01:01, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
> This has just reminded me that i am currently stuck on
> java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.131-11.b12.el7.x86_64
> on CentOS 7 with TomEE 7.0.3
> updating to
> Version : 1.8.0.144
> Release : 0.b01.el7_4
> results in random freezes with no error in catalina.out
>
> On 27/09/2017 20:10, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Tested this TomEE+ 7.0.4 RC with our various web apps on Linux Redhat
>> 6.5 with Java 8 update 144.
>> Using JAX-RS (with Johnzon specifics), JAX-WS, JMS
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>> 2017-09-26 23:24 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and
>>> place your
>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>
>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>>
>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>>
>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>
>>>
>>> Staging repo:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>
>>> Source zip:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>
>>>
>>> Dist area:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>>>
>>> Legal:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>
>>>
>>> Keys:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>
>>> Changelog:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>
>>>
>>> Green buildbot:
>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>
>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>
>>> Please vote:
>>> +1: Release
>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>
>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much
>>> information
>>> as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At
>>> least 3
>>> binding votes).
>>>
>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank
>>> you very
>>> much for your time.
>>>
>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Matthew Broadhead <ma...@nbmlaw.co.uk>.
This has just reminded me that i am currently stuck on
java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.131-11.b12.el7.x86_64
on CentOS 7 with TomEE 7.0.3
updating to
Version : 1.8.0.144
Release : 0.b01.el7_4
results in random freezes with no error in catalina.out
On 27/09/2017 20:10, Alex The Rocker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Tested this TomEE+ 7.0.4 RC with our various web apps on Linux Redhat
> 6.5 with Java 8 update 144.
> Using JAX-RS (with Johnzon specifics), JAX-WS, JMS
>
> Thanks,
> Alexandre
>
>
> 2017-09-26 23:24 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place your
>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>
>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>>
>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>>
>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>>
>> Source zip:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>
>> Dist area:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>>
>> Legal:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>
>> Keys:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>
>> Changelog:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12339959
>>
>> Green buildbot:
>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>
>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>
>> Please vote:
>> +1: Release
>> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>
>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much information
>> as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>>
>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At least 3
>> binding votes).
>>
>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you very
>> much for your time.
>>
>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.4 - Roll 2
Posted by Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
+1 (non binding)
Tested this TomEE+ 7.0.4 RC with our various web apps on Linux Redhat
6.5 with Java 8 update 144.
Using JAX-RS (with Johnzon specifics), JAX-WS, JMS
Thanks,
Alexandre
2017-09-26 23:24 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and place your
> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>
> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided).
>
> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, which is
> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag:
>
> --add-module java.xml.bind
>
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/
>
> Source zip:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>
> Dist area:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/
>
> Legal:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>
> Keys:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>
> Changelog:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12339959
>
> Green buildbot:
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/725
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>
> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>
> Please vote:
> +1: Release
> -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>
> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as much information
> as possible and, if applicable, a unit test.
>
> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At least 3
> binding votes).
>
> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. Thank you very
> much for your time.
>
> Andy Gumbrecht.
>