You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@forrest.apache.org by je...@apache.org on 2003/01/03 16:58:26 UTC
cvs commit: xml-forrest/etc DTD_DEFICIENCIES.txt
jefft 2003/01/03 07:58:26
Modified: etc Tag: LINKMAP_BRANCH DTD_DEFICIENCIES.txt
Log:
Need <source> inside <dd>'s too
Revision Changes Path
No revision
No revision
1.5.2.1 +3 -3 xml-forrest/etc/DTD_DEFICIENCIES.txt
Index: DTD_DEFICIENCIES.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-forrest/etc/DTD_DEFICIENCIES.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.5.2.1
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.5.2.1
--- DTD_DEFICIENCIES.txt 15 Dec 2002 22:53:53 -0000 1.5
+++ DTD_DEFICIENCIES.txt 3 Jan 2003 15:58:26 -0000 1.5.2.1
@@ -59,8 +59,8 @@
I can see no reason why being a "list item" implies being limited to a single
paragraph.
-4) Allow <p>, <li> etc inside <dd>
-----------------------------------
+4) Allow <p>, <li>, <source> etc inside <dd>
+--------------------------------------------
Submittor: Jeff Turner
Date: 2002-11-20
Yeas: jefft
Re: cvs commit: xml-forrest/etc DTD_DEFICIENCIES.txt
Posted by Joerg Pietschmann <j3...@yahoo.de>.
On Friday 03 January 2003 16:58, jefft@apache.org wrote:
> Modified: etc Tag: LINKMAP_BRANCH DTD_DEFICIENCIES.txt
Um, what *is* the preferred method to collect use case, problems,
suggestions and so on regarding the DTDs?
We have at least
- bugzilla
- forrest dev
- the document mentioned above
There's also the Apache wiki, even though it lacks a specific DTD
section.
Now the real content: I rediscovered two long outstanding issues with
the FAQ DTD:
1. The FAQ title is still an attribute to the FAQ element instead of a
child element. Do we have to go through the whole discussion again
for each of the title nodes?
2. The FAQ part element is named much too generic, it should be
renamed to faqsection.
J.Pietschmann