You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@community.apache.org by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> on 2014/07/11 21:36:28 UTC
OSGi and CXF and Karaf and who knows what at ApacheCon
I need help with the content that's in the CXF/OSGi tab on the
spreadsheet at http://tm3.org/aceu2014tracks
I must admit that I am utterly ignorant of this technology space, and
I'm not even sure if it's a legit categorization for a track or group of
tracks.
Can someone please review the stuff in there, possibly splitting it into
two separate tabs that we can schedule from?
A track, by the way, is 6 talks, plus, optionally, one or more talks by
people who already have accepted talks, to serve as fallbacks.
Thanks
--Rich
--
Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
Re: OSGi and CXF and Karaf and who knows what at ApacheCon
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Jan Willem Janssen
<ja...@luminis.eu> wrote:
> I've taken the liberty of proposing a split for two tracks,
> CXF and OSGi, which can be found in column M.
This was my generalists take as well.
Re: OSGi and CXF and Karaf and who knows what at ApacheCon
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Jan Willem Janssen
<ja...@luminis.eu> wrote:
> CXF and OSGi are not really related to each other...
I agree, I don't see much in the suggested CXF talks that makes them
belong to an OSGi track.
> ...I've taken the liberty of proposing a split for two tracks,
> CXF and OSGi, which can be found in column M....
I agree with that split.
-Bertrand
Re: OSGi and CXF and Karaf and who knows what at ApacheCon
Posted by Jan Willem Janssen <ja...@luminis.eu>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/07/14 21:36, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I need help with the content that's in the CXF/OSGi tab on the
> spreadsheet at http://tm3.org/aceu2014tracks
>
> I must admit that I am utterly ignorant of this technology space,
> and I'm not even sure if it's a legit categorization for a track or
> group of tracks.
>
> Can someone please review the stuff in there, possibly splitting it
> into two separate tabs that we can schedule from?
CXF and OSGi are not really related to each other, in my opinion.
Although CXF uses OSGi internally, the proposed talks on CXF are more
about creating REST/Web APIs. I think we could separate these into two
tracks. I've taken the liberty of proposing a split for two tracks,
CXF and OSGi, which can be found in column M.
WDYT?
- --
Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards
Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect
+31 631 765 814
/My world is revolving around PulseOn and Amdatu/
Luminis Technologies B.V.
J.C. Wilslaan 29
7313 HK Apeldoorn
+31 88 586 46 30
http://www.luminis-technologies.com
http://www.luminis.eu
KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93
BTW (VAT) NL8169.78.566.B.01
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTwGCaAAoJEKF/mP2eHDc48aUQAKh+lGG9mrVXCB4FiXpBOE3a
5f2YRBAm5oHZ59LITUOwg1N33F4UV1ppBUCNrxdSybhr1BswvlBpqOf3KbNMhbn2
0LprlsOWLAhFPbjH3mRCVseeKRYGb1QpL0N7s0c0fFcgWvgSisUngBtaxtptGrBF
Emvb0ofVeZN0SMS/p6lURJ3/460fnr8Oo2T2vVQOv6Ode5QRrwQKvbTtVGPFE7ef
d0kVkQR48R1DKZ/RB25o3sm1D58r83gu7RUetU85cEAbH/qQ3XVOzddKkDPbanfU
phGCXd4zjeWq+USgFHvuPj7t2E1HMwBWFA5yTOUvZGe3wx8c4RkF2pIqPdeKpPTI
6txo1przBHgCMGYGgSjgtjVjmfLx/ec3KFE2BLQTKvVENHoFSj7jvQX882mqUSBU
fP7MjOgttTRew2ceV8zuqwApZOLPFMwWzymgid3MDMTctw/Yyqbf35MO9qMh0jEW
of4wFsFGHEvpkTCy6AMuZ4Pt2KJL1a2VbMWJ0vwL5Cv01TsT0Bc0Xr19ajhBT5Ki
fLwd1Lifae3z2vVqsl8vIeSPdrl5U7pwhKKx16gDDGfPFJpiMBrCbmR8ZNQG+d1h
KR1MY3ob3WkKP3pzhTMrurFVhdXxkULWk1HYV1V9leR/X8Hev0sbGS5tAOwjYRig
7LcpYfYgd6KVPOCjSL6o
=XU82
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----