You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to netcat@netbeans.apache.org by joe schmo <ge...@hotmail.com> on 2019/03/13 01:54:35 UTC
need another spec to test
Hello,
I've finished the JUnit test spec, I have skipped a lot of tests, partly because the focus is on Maven but for other reasons as well, for example
Note from Rick: Skip this test case! I need to do some research on why it is here.
If I were qualified I would offer to help work on that spec.
Also, I have raised an issue which I think is major, not sure what qualifies as a "Blocker" but here it is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2248?filter=-2
I am available to test another spec, not sure I will finish in the next 5 days but I'll give it a shot.
BC
Re: need another spec to test
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
Yes, that's great, thanks -- and as soon as we have wrapped up the release,
i.e., as soon as 11.0 is released, we'll work together on cleaning up the
test specs. That should be our number one priority in NetCAT as soon as we
have released 11.0.
Gj
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:24 AM joe schmo <ge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I have made some notes about the last spec I was working on, I would be
> happy to work on some of the specs I tested but I would probably need to
> need quite a bit of guidance, I wouldn't be comfortable working on them
> unless someone could review them before I submitted the specs.
>
> BC
> ________________________________
> From: Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>
> Sent: March 13, 2019 10:41 AM
> To: joe schmo
> Cc: netcat@netbeans.apache.org
> Subject: Re: need another spec to test
>
> Add notes and observations to mine here when you have them:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+11.0+Evaluation
>
> Gj
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:39 PM Geertjan Wielenga <
> geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com<ma...@googlemail.com>>
> wrote:
> Just focus on EE7.
>
> Gj
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:38 PM joe schmo <geekyguy444@hotmail.com<mailto:
> geekyguy444@hotmail.com>> wrote:
> Ok, I have vc3.
>
> Question, do I need to do all tests 3 times? For Javae5,6,7 ?
>
> Instructions are:
>
> Setup: Test all J2EE project types for both JavaEE5 and JavaEE6. (and now
> we have JavaEE7)
>
> Thanks
>
> BC
> ________________________________
> From: Geertjan Wielenga <geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com<mailto:
> geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com>>
> Sent: March 13, 2019 6:39 AM
> To: joe schmo
> Cc: netcat@netbeans.apache.org<ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: need another spec to test
>
> Done. Make sure to use vc3.
>
> Thanks for your work,
>
> Gj
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:33 AM joe schmo <geekyguy444@hotmail.com
> <ma...@hotmail.com><mailto:geekyguy444@hotmail.com<mailto:
> geekyguy444@hotmail.com>>> wrote:
> I can look at this one
> http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/266/v/2
> ________________________________
> From: Geertjan Wielenga <geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com<mailto:
> geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com><mailto:geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com
> <ma...@googlemail.com>>>
> Sent: March 13, 2019 5:14 AM
> To: joe schmo
> Cc: netcat@netbeans.apache.org<ma...@netbeans.apache.org><mailto:
> netcat@netbeans.apache.org<ma...@netbeans.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: need another spec to test
>
> Thanks for all your work. The issue, I've looked at it, definitely not
> blocker or major, but basically we need to work through all the test specs
> from scratch again to see whether they still apply -- i.e., if the spec
> itself is out of date then we're going to be getting false positive issues.
>
> In which area or which specific test spec would you like to do next:
> http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/run/30/v/2
>
> Gj
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:54 AM joe schmo <geekyguy444@hotmail.com<mailto:
> geekyguy444@hotmail.com><mailto:geekyguy444@hotmail.com<mailto:
> geekyguy444@hotmail.com>><mailto:geekyguy444@hotmail.com<mailto:
> geekyguy444@hotmail.com><mailto:geekyguy444@hotmail.com<mailto:
> geekyguy444@hotmail.com>>>> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've finished the JUnit test spec, I have skipped a lot of tests, partly
> because the focus is on Maven but for other reasons as well, for example
>
> Note from Rick: Skip this test case! I need to do some research on why it
> is here.
>
> If I were qualified I would offer to help work on that spec.
> Also, I have raised an issue which I think is major, not sure what
> qualifies as a "Blocker" but here it is
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2248?filter=-2
>
> I am available to test another spec, not sure I will finish in the next 5
> days but I'll give it a shot.
>
> BC
>
Re: need another spec to test
Posted by joe schmo <ge...@hotmail.com>.
I have made some notes about the last spec I was working on, I would be happy to work on some of the specs I tested but I would probably need to need quite a bit of guidance, I wouldn't be comfortable working on them unless someone could review them before I submitted the specs.
BC
________________________________
From: Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>
Sent: March 13, 2019 10:41 AM
To: joe schmo
Cc: netcat@netbeans.apache.org
Subject: Re: need another spec to test
Add notes and observations to mine here when you have them:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+11.0+Evaluation
Gj
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:39 PM Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>> wrote:
Just focus on EE7.
Gj
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:38 PM joe schmo <ge...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Ok, I have vc3.
Question, do I need to do all tests 3 times? For Javae5,6,7 ?
Instructions are:
Setup: Test all J2EE project types for both JavaEE5 and JavaEE6. (and now we have JavaEE7)
Thanks
BC
________________________________
From: Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>>
Sent: March 13, 2019 6:39 AM
To: joe schmo
Cc: netcat@netbeans.apache.org<ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
Subject: Re: need another spec to test
Done. Make sure to use vc3.
Thanks for your work,
Gj
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:33 AM joe schmo <ge...@hotmail.com>>> wrote:
I can look at this one http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/266/v/2
________________________________
From: Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>>>
Sent: March 13, 2019 5:14 AM
To: joe schmo
Cc: netcat@netbeans.apache.org<ma...@netbeans.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: need another spec to test
Thanks for all your work. The issue, I've looked at it, definitely not blocker or major, but basically we need to work through all the test specs from scratch again to see whether they still apply -- i.e., if the spec itself is out of date then we're going to be getting false positive issues.
In which area or which specific test spec would you like to do next: http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/run/30/v/2
Gj
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:54 AM joe schmo <ge...@hotmail.com>>>> wrote:
Hello,
I've finished the JUnit test spec, I have skipped a lot of tests, partly because the focus is on Maven but for other reasons as well, for example
Note from Rick: Skip this test case! I need to do some research on why it is here.
If I were qualified I would offer to help work on that spec.
Also, I have raised an issue which I think is major, not sure what qualifies as a "Blocker" but here it is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2248?filter=-2
I am available to test another spec, not sure I will finish in the next 5 days but I'll give it a shot.
BC
Re: need another spec to test
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
Add notes and observations to mine here when you have them:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+11.0+Evaluation
Gj
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:39 PM Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Just focus on EE7.
>
> Gj
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:38 PM joe schmo <ge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok, I have vc3.
>>
>> Question, do I need to do all tests 3 times? For Javae5,6,7 ?
>>
>> Instructions are:
>>
>> Setup: Test all J2EE project types for both JavaEE5 and JavaEE6. (and now
>> we have JavaEE7)
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> BC
>> ________________________________
>> From: Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>
>> Sent: March 13, 2019 6:39 AM
>> To: joe schmo
>> Cc: netcat@netbeans.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: need another spec to test
>>
>> Done. Make sure to use vc3.
>>
>> Thanks for your work,
>>
>> Gj
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:33 AM joe schmo <geekyguy444@hotmail.com
>> <ma...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>> I can look at this one
>> http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/266/v/2
>> ________________________________
>> From: Geertjan Wielenga <geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com<mailto:
>> geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com>>
>> Sent: March 13, 2019 5:14 AM
>> To: joe schmo
>> Cc: netcat@netbeans.apache.org<ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: need another spec to test
>>
>> Thanks for all your work. The issue, I've looked at it, definitely not
>> blocker or major, but basically we need to work through all the test specs
>> from scratch again to see whether they still apply -- i.e., if the spec
>> itself is out of date then we're going to be getting false positive issues.
>>
>> In which area or which specific test spec would you like to do next:
>> http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/run/30/v/2
>>
>> Gj
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:54 AM joe schmo <geekyguy444@hotmail.com
>> <ma...@hotmail.com><mailto:geekyguy444@hotmail.com<mailto:
>> geekyguy444@hotmail.com>>> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've finished the JUnit test spec, I have skipped a lot of tests, partly
>> because the focus is on Maven but for other reasons as well, for example
>>
>> Note from Rick: Skip this test case! I need to do some research on why it
>> is here.
>>
>> If I were qualified I would offer to help work on that spec.
>> Also, I have raised an issue which I think is major, not sure what
>> qualifies as a "Blocker" but here it is
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2248?filter=-2
>>
>> I am available to test another spec, not sure I will finish in the next 5
>> days but I'll give it a shot.
>>
>> BC
>>
>
Re: need another spec to test
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
Just focus on EE7.
Gj
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:38 PM joe schmo <ge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I have vc3.
>
> Question, do I need to do all tests 3 times? For Javae5,6,7 ?
>
> Instructions are:
>
> Setup: Test all J2EE project types for both JavaEE5 and JavaEE6. (and now
> we have JavaEE7)
>
> Thanks
>
> BC
> ________________________________
> From: Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>
> Sent: March 13, 2019 6:39 AM
> To: joe schmo
> Cc: netcat@netbeans.apache.org
> Subject: Re: need another spec to test
>
> Done. Make sure to use vc3.
>
> Thanks for your work,
>
> Gj
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:33 AM joe schmo <geekyguy444@hotmail.com
> <ma...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
> I can look at this one
> http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/266/v/2
> ________________________________
> From: Geertjan Wielenga <geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com<mailto:
> geertjan.wielenga@googlemail.com>>
> Sent: March 13, 2019 5:14 AM
> To: joe schmo
> Cc: netcat@netbeans.apache.org<ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: need another spec to test
>
> Thanks for all your work. The issue, I've looked at it, definitely not
> blocker or major, but basically we need to work through all the test specs
> from scratch again to see whether they still apply -- i.e., if the spec
> itself is out of date then we're going to be getting false positive issues.
>
> In which area or which specific test spec would you like to do next:
> http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/run/30/v/2
>
> Gj
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:54 AM joe schmo <geekyguy444@hotmail.com<mailto:
> geekyguy444@hotmail.com><mailto:geekyguy444@hotmail.com<mailto:
> geekyguy444@hotmail.com>>> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've finished the JUnit test spec, I have skipped a lot of tests, partly
> because the focus is on Maven but for other reasons as well, for example
>
> Note from Rick: Skip this test case! I need to do some research on why it
> is here.
>
> If I were qualified I would offer to help work on that spec.
> Also, I have raised an issue which I think is major, not sure what
> qualifies as a "Blocker" but here it is
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2248?filter=-2
>
> I am available to test another spec, not sure I will finish in the next 5
> days but I'll give it a shot.
>
> BC
>
Re: need another spec to test
Posted by joe schmo <ge...@hotmail.com>.
Ok, I have vc3.
Question, do I need to do all tests 3 times? For Javae5,6,7 ?
Instructions are:
Setup: Test all J2EE project types for both JavaEE5 and JavaEE6. (and now we have JavaEE7)
Thanks
BC
________________________________
From: Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>
Sent: March 13, 2019 6:39 AM
To: joe schmo
Cc: netcat@netbeans.apache.org
Subject: Re: need another spec to test
Done. Make sure to use vc3.
Thanks for your work,
Gj
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:33 AM joe schmo <ge...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
I can look at this one http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/266/v/2
________________________________
From: Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>>
Sent: March 13, 2019 5:14 AM
To: joe schmo
Cc: netcat@netbeans.apache.org<ma...@netbeans.apache.org>
Subject: Re: need another spec to test
Thanks for all your work. The issue, I've looked at it, definitely not blocker or major, but basically we need to work through all the test specs from scratch again to see whether they still apply -- i.e., if the spec itself is out of date then we're going to be getting false positive issues.
In which area or which specific test spec would you like to do next: http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/run/30/v/2
Gj
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:54 AM joe schmo <ge...@hotmail.com>>> wrote:
Hello,
I've finished the JUnit test spec, I have skipped a lot of tests, partly because the focus is on Maven but for other reasons as well, for example
Note from Rick: Skip this test case! I need to do some research on why it is here.
If I were qualified I would offer to help work on that spec.
Also, I have raised an issue which I think is major, not sure what qualifies as a "Blocker" but here it is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2248?filter=-2
I am available to test another spec, not sure I will finish in the next 5 days but I'll give it a shot.
BC
Re: need another spec to test
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
Done. Make sure to use vc3.
Thanks for your work,
Gj
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:33 AM joe schmo <ge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I can look at this one
> http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/266/v/2
> ________________________________
> From: Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>
> Sent: March 13, 2019 5:14 AM
> To: joe schmo
> Cc: netcat@netbeans.apache.org
> Subject: Re: need another spec to test
>
> Thanks for all your work. The issue, I've looked at it, definitely not
> blocker or major, but basically we need to work through all the test specs
> from scratch again to see whether they still apply -- i.e., if the spec
> itself is out of date then we're going to be getting false positive issues.
>
> In which area or which specific test spec would you like to do next:
> http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/run/30/v/2
>
> Gj
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:54 AM joe schmo <geekyguy444@hotmail.com<mailto:
> geekyguy444@hotmail.com>> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've finished the JUnit test spec, I have skipped a lot of tests, partly
> because the focus is on Maven but for other reasons as well, for example
>
> Note from Rick: Skip this test case! I need to do some research on why it
> is here.
>
> If I were qualified I would offer to help work on that spec.
> Also, I have raised an issue which I think is major, not sure what
> qualifies as a "Blocker" but here it is
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2248?filter=-2
>
> I am available to test another spec, not sure I will finish in the next 5
> days but I'll give it a shot.
>
> BC
>
Re: need another spec to test
Posted by joe schmo <ge...@hotmail.com>.
I can look at this one http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/266/v/2
________________________________
From: Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>
Sent: March 13, 2019 5:14 AM
To: joe schmo
Cc: netcat@netbeans.apache.org
Subject: Re: need another spec to test
Thanks for all your work. The issue, I've looked at it, definitely not blocker or major, but basically we need to work through all the test specs from scratch again to see whether they still apply -- i.e., if the spec itself is out of date then we're going to be getting false positive issues.
In which area or which specific test spec would you like to do next: http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/run/30/v/2
Gj
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:54 AM joe schmo <ge...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
I've finished the JUnit test spec, I have skipped a lot of tests, partly because the focus is on Maven but for other reasons as well, for example
Note from Rick: Skip this test case! I need to do some research on why it is here.
If I were qualified I would offer to help work on that spec.
Also, I have raised an issue which I think is major, not sure what qualifies as a "Blocker" but here it is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2248?filter=-2
I am available to test another spec, not sure I will finish in the next 5 days but I'll give it a shot.
BC
Re: need another spec to test
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
Thanks for all your work. The issue, I've looked at it, definitely not
blocker or major, but basically we need to work through all the test specs
from scratch again to see whether they still apply -- i.e., if the spec
itself is out of date then we're going to be getting false positive issues.
In which area or which specific test spec would you like to do next:
http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/run/30/v/2
Gj
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:54 AM joe schmo <ge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've finished the JUnit test spec, I have skipped a lot of tests, partly
> because the focus is on Maven but for other reasons as well, for example
>
> Note from Rick: Skip this test case! I need to do some research on why it
> is here.
>
> If I were qualified I would offer to help work on that spec.
> Also, I have raised an issue which I think is major, not sure what
> qualifies as a "Blocker" but here it is
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2248?filter=-2
>
> I am available to test another spec, not sure I will finish in the next 5
> days but I'll give it a shot.
>
> BC
>