You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to test-dev@httpd.apache.org by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org> on 2004/07/09 22:01:56 UTC
Re:
David Wheeler wrote:
> now I think I'll commit a change so that TestMB only outputs the
> "Generating test running script" message if verbosity is enabled. Maybe
> you'd like to consider that for TestMM, too?
I think we should try to be consistent with all TestM* frontends, no?
I think we kept this message, in the same fashion to MakeMaker writing
what does it do. and it's good to tell the user that a utility was
created, so they know they can use it. e.g. we tell people to use
t/TEST -v foo
when running specific tests, so it's good to know that it was created.
But I don't have a strong feeling about that.
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
Re: Silence TestMB?
Posted by David Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com>.
On Jul 9, 2004, at 1:19 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
> It's up to you, since at the moment you are the only MB dev -- you are
> the king :)
I'll leave it for now, then.
David
Re: Silence TestMB?
Posted by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org>.
oops, thanks for the subject :)
David Wheeler wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2004, at 1:01 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>> I think we should try to be consistent with all TestM* frontends, no?
>
>
> Yes.
>
>> I think we kept this message, in the same fashion to MakeMaker writing
>> what does it do. and it's good to tell the user that a utility was
>> created, so they know they can use it. e.g. we tell people to use
>>
>> t/TEST -v foo
>>
>> when running specific tests, so it's good to know that it was created.
>
>
> Hrm. That's a point. I was just thinking that it might be good not to
> change the usual output of MM or MB unless we were asked to be verbose.
>
>> But I don't have a strong feeling about that.
>
>
> Me, neither, it was just easy to add. I'll revert the change if others
> feel strongly about it.
It's up to you, since at the moment you are the only MB dev -- you are
the king :)
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
Silence TestMB?
Posted by David Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com>.
On Jul 9, 2004, at 1:01 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
> I think we should try to be consistent with all TestM* frontends, no?
Yes.
> I think we kept this message, in the same fashion to MakeMaker writing
> what does it do. and it's good to tell the user that a utility was
> created, so they know they can use it. e.g. we tell people to use
>
> t/TEST -v foo
>
> when running specific tests, so it's good to know that it was created.
Hrm. That's a point. I was just thinking that it might be good not to
change the usual output of MM or MB unless we were asked to be verbose.
> But I don't have a strong feeling about that.
Me, neither, it was just easy to add. I'll revert the change if others
feel strongly about it.
Regards,
David