You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@parquet.apache.org by "Julien Le Dem (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/08/03 18:12:20 UTC
[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (PARQUET-323) INT96 should be marked
as deprecated
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Julien Le Dem updated PARQUET-323:
----------------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: I think we should deprecate it and discourage its use. For backward compatibility, it has to stay.
https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/blob/master/LogicalTypes.md doesn't even refer to it.
)
> INT96 should be marked as deprecated
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: PARQUET-323
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-323
> Project: Parquet
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: parquet-format
> Reporter: Cheng Lian
>
> As discussed in the mailing list, {{INT96}} is only used to represent nanosec timestamp in Impala for some historical reasons, and should be deprecated. Since nanosec precision is rarely a real requirement, one possible and simple solution would be replacing {{INT96}} with {{INT64 (TIMESTAMP_MILLIS)}} or {{INT64 (TIMESTAMP_MICROS)}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)