You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by James Holmes <ja...@jamesholmes.com> on 2008/11/25 02:16:18 UTC
Re: ur.includeParams to none?
+1
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Anybody care if I change the default to "none"? I'm tired of people
> complaining about it because reading the documentation is too hard.
>
> Dave
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: ur.includeParams to none?
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
That and the "validateAnnotatedMethodOnly" thing are very annoying.
musachy
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:16 PM, James Holmes <ja...@jamesholmes.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Anybody care if I change the default to "none"? I'm tired of people
> > complaining about it because reading the documentation is too hard.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd