You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "angela (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/11/20 20:04:35 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-1206) Consider renaming internal nodetypes and item names

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

angela updated OAK-1206:
------------------------

    Summary: Consider renaming internal nodetypes and item names  (was: Consider renaming internal nodetypes)

> Consider renaming internal nodetypes and item names
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-1206
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1206
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Tobias Bocanegra
>
> some new nodetypes have the oak namespace but are used only internally. in jackrabbit 2.x we used the 'internal' namespace for those.
> I suggest to use the internal namespace for nodes that are not (or should not) be created via JCR, namely:
> * rep:NodeType
> * rep:NamedPropertyDefinitions
> * rep:PropertyDefinitions
> * rep:PropertyDefinition
> * rep:NamedChildNodeDefinitions
> * rep:ChildNodeDefinitions
> * rep:ChildNodeDefinition
> see also OAK-1180



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)