You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by "Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/01/21 16:55:54 UTC

[jira] Updated: (DIRSHARED-37) Reconsider interfaces and base classes for Registries

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-37?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRSHARED-37:
---------------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 1.0.0-RC1

Let's do that for 1.0

> Reconsider interfaces and base classes for Registries
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSHARED-37
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-37
>             Project: Directory Shared
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Alex Karasulu
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.0.0-RC1
>
>
> Previously the registries were specifically used by the DS but now they must be used by both studio and the LDAP API.  The DS demands strict handling of various schema object dependencies while Studio does not and requires relaxed usage.  The LDAP API will have further requirements perhaps, perhaps not.  However a couple semantic handling requirements were introduced into the Registries to make them handle these various cases (relaxed verses strict usage).  Rather than leaving these semantics in a single implementation we should instead reconsider splitting the implementation and re-exposing interfaces to use different implementations. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.