You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> on 2009/09/02 11:34:01 UTC
[DISCUSS] Abdera bundles
Hi again,
I'm working on SMXCOMP-611 to provide bundles required by CXF.
I have question regarding abdera bundle.
Currently, we have an abdera-0.4.0-incubating bundle linked to the
abdera-core dependency.
CXF required other abdera dependency.
I propose to create the following new bundles:
- abdera-core-1.0
- abdera-client-1.0
- abdera-i18n-1.0
- abdera-parser-1.0
- abdera-spring-1.0
- abdera-extensions-geo-1.0
- abdera-extensions-html-1.0
- abdera-extensions-json-1.0
- abdera-extensions-main-1.0
Does it make sense for you ?
Thanks
Regards
JB
Re: [DISCUSS] Abdera bundles
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
I don't know much about abdera. I guess the question is how those jars are
related. Is there any discovery mechanism that would break in osgi ?
If having separate bundles can easily be done, we should do that (and also
contribute a patch to abdera to avoid having to release those bundles each
time we want to upgrade). If it's not doable, we should aim for a single
bundle (and maybe also contribute a patch for that).
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 15:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> After dealing with Dan on IRC, CXF requires the following bundles:
>
> org.apache.abdera:abdera-core:0.4.0-incubating
> org.apache.abdera:abdera-i18n:0.4.0-incubating
> org.apache.abdera:abdera-parser:0.4.0-incubating
> org.apache.abdera:abdera-extensions-json:0.4.0-incubating
> org.apache.abdera:abdera-extensions-main:0.4.0-incubating
>
> Currently, only abdera-core is provided.
>
> I have two ways to do it:
> 1/ create only abdera bundle gathering all abdera components
> 2/ create one bundle per abdera part.
>
> From my point of view, I prefer 2 especially if the life cycle of abdera
> components is different (if the extensions version goes faster than the core
> part for example).
>
> What's your opinion ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> Are they packaged in a way that turning them into OSGi bundles is even
>> possible ?
>> I'm mostly thinking about split packages: if the same package is provided
>> by
>> two different jars (each one contributing a few classes to the package),
>> it
>> won't work in OSGi and we'd have to turn them into a single bundle.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi again,
>>>
>>> I'm working on SMXCOMP-611 to provide bundles required by CXF.
>>>
>>> I have question regarding abdera bundle.
>>>
>>> Currently, we have an abdera-0.4.0-incubating bundle linked to the
>>> abdera-core dependency.
>>>
>>> CXF required other abdera dependency.
>>>
>>> I propose to create the following new bundles:
>>> - abdera-core-1.0
>>> - abdera-client-1.0
>>> - abdera-i18n-1.0
>>> - abdera-parser-1.0
>>> - abdera-spring-1.0
>>> - abdera-extensions-geo-1.0
>>> - abdera-extensions-html-1.0
>>> - abdera-extensions-json-1.0
>>> - abdera-extensions-main-1.0
>>>
>>> Does it make sense for you ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Abdera bundles
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Wed September 2 2009 10:20:10 am Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Lol,
>
> in this case, we can gather all in one bundle, ok with that ?
Yep. Works for me. :-)
Dan
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > I don't think Abdera HAS a release life cycle. They've been trying to
> > get 1.0 out for well over a year now. That's why we're stuck on 0.4.0.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Wed September 2 2009 9:24:36 am Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >> After dealing with Dan on IRC, CXF requires the following bundles:
> >>
> >> org.apache.abdera:abdera-core:0.4.0-incubating
> >> org.apache.abdera:abdera-i18n:0.4.0-incubating
> >> org.apache.abdera:abdera-parser:0.4.0-incubating
> >> org.apache.abdera:abdera-extensions-json:0.4.0-incubating
> >> org.apache.abdera:abdera-extensions-main:0.4.0-incubating
> >>
> >> Currently, only abdera-core is provided.
> >>
> >> I have two ways to do it:
> >> 1/ create only abdera bundle gathering all abdera components
> >> 2/ create one bundle per abdera part.
> >>
> >> From my point of view, I prefer 2 especially if the life cycle of
> >> abdera components is different (if the extensions version goes faster
> >> than the core part for example).
> >>
> >> What's your opinion ?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >>> Are they packaged in a way that turning them into OSGi bundles is even
> >>> possible ?
> >>> I'm mostly thinking about split packages: if the same package is
> >>> provided by two different jars (each one contributing a few classes to
> >>> the package), it won't work in OSGi and we'd have to turn them into a
> >>> single bundle.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> >
> > wrote:
> >>>> Hi again,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm working on SMXCOMP-611 to provide bundles required by CXF.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have question regarding abdera bundle.
> >>>>
> >>>> Currently, we have an abdera-0.4.0-incubating bundle linked to the
> >>>> abdera-core dependency.
> >>>>
> >>>> CXF required other abdera dependency.
> >>>>
> >>>> I propose to create the following new bundles:
> >>>> - abdera-core-1.0
> >>>> - abdera-client-1.0
> >>>> - abdera-i18n-1.0
> >>>> - abdera-parser-1.0
> >>>> - abdera-spring-1.0
> >>>> - abdera-extensions-geo-1.0
> >>>> - abdera-extensions-html-1.0
> >>>> - abdera-extensions-json-1.0
> >>>> - abdera-extensions-main-1.0
> >>>>
> >>>> Does it make sense for you ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> JB
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: [DISCUSS] Abdera bundles
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Lol,
in this case, we can gather all in one bundle, ok with that ?
Regards
JB
Daniel Kulp wrote:
> I don't think Abdera HAS a release life cycle. They've been trying to get
> 1.0 out for well over a year now. That's why we're stuck on 0.4.0.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Wed September 2 2009 9:24:36 am Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> After dealing with Dan on IRC, CXF requires the following bundles:
>>
>> org.apache.abdera:abdera-core:0.4.0-incubating
>> org.apache.abdera:abdera-i18n:0.4.0-incubating
>> org.apache.abdera:abdera-parser:0.4.0-incubating
>> org.apache.abdera:abdera-extensions-json:0.4.0-incubating
>> org.apache.abdera:abdera-extensions-main:0.4.0-incubating
>>
>> Currently, only abdera-core is provided.
>>
>> I have two ways to do it:
>> 1/ create only abdera bundle gathering all abdera components
>> 2/ create one bundle per abdera part.
>>
>> From my point of view, I prefer 2 especially if the life cycle of
>> abdera components is different (if the extensions version goes faster
>> than the core part for example).
>>
>> What's your opinion ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>> Are they packaged in a way that turning them into OSGi bundles is even
>>> possible ?
>>> I'm mostly thinking about split packages: if the same package is provided
>>> by two different jars (each one contributing a few classes to the
>>> package), it won't work in OSGi and we'd have to turn them into a single
>>> bundle.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>>>> Hi again,
>>>>
>>>> I'm working on SMXCOMP-611 to provide bundles required by CXF.
>>>>
>>>> I have question regarding abdera bundle.
>>>>
>>>> Currently, we have an abdera-0.4.0-incubating bundle linked to the
>>>> abdera-core dependency.
>>>>
>>>> CXF required other abdera dependency.
>>>>
>>>> I propose to create the following new bundles:
>>>> - abdera-core-1.0
>>>> - abdera-client-1.0
>>>> - abdera-i18n-1.0
>>>> - abdera-parser-1.0
>>>> - abdera-spring-1.0
>>>> - abdera-extensions-geo-1.0
>>>> - abdera-extensions-html-1.0
>>>> - abdera-extensions-json-1.0
>>>> - abdera-extensions-main-1.0
>>>>
>>>> Does it make sense for you ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Abdera bundles
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
I don't think Abdera HAS a release life cycle. They've been trying to get
1.0 out for well over a year now. That's why we're stuck on 0.4.0.
Dan
On Wed September 2 2009 9:24:36 am Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> After dealing with Dan on IRC, CXF requires the following bundles:
>
> org.apache.abdera:abdera-core:0.4.0-incubating
> org.apache.abdera:abdera-i18n:0.4.0-incubating
> org.apache.abdera:abdera-parser:0.4.0-incubating
> org.apache.abdera:abdera-extensions-json:0.4.0-incubating
> org.apache.abdera:abdera-extensions-main:0.4.0-incubating
>
> Currently, only abdera-core is provided.
>
> I have two ways to do it:
> 1/ create only abdera bundle gathering all abdera components
> 2/ create one bundle per abdera part.
>
> From my point of view, I prefer 2 especially if the life cycle of
> abdera components is different (if the extensions version goes faster
> than the core part for example).
>
> What's your opinion ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > Are they packaged in a way that turning them into OSGi bundles is even
> > possible ?
> > I'm mostly thinking about split packages: if the same package is provided
> > by two different jars (each one contributing a few classes to the
> > package), it won't work in OSGi and we'd have to turn them into a single
> > bundle.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> >> Hi again,
> >>
> >> I'm working on SMXCOMP-611 to provide bundles required by CXF.
> >>
> >> I have question regarding abdera bundle.
> >>
> >> Currently, we have an abdera-0.4.0-incubating bundle linked to the
> >> abdera-core dependency.
> >>
> >> CXF required other abdera dependency.
> >>
> >> I propose to create the following new bundles:
> >> - abdera-core-1.0
> >> - abdera-client-1.0
> >> - abdera-i18n-1.0
> >> - abdera-parser-1.0
> >> - abdera-spring-1.0
> >> - abdera-extensions-geo-1.0
> >> - abdera-extensions-html-1.0
> >> - abdera-extensions-json-1.0
> >> - abdera-extensions-main-1.0
> >>
> >> Does it make sense for you ?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Regards
> >> JB
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: [DISCUSS] Abdera bundles
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
After dealing with Dan on IRC, CXF requires the following bundles:
org.apache.abdera:abdera-core:0.4.0-incubating
org.apache.abdera:abdera-i18n:0.4.0-incubating
org.apache.abdera:abdera-parser:0.4.0-incubating
org.apache.abdera:abdera-extensions-json:0.4.0-incubating
org.apache.abdera:abdera-extensions-main:0.4.0-incubating
Currently, only abdera-core is provided.
I have two ways to do it:
1/ create only abdera bundle gathering all abdera components
2/ create one bundle per abdera part.
From my point of view, I prefer 2 especially if the life cycle of
abdera components is different (if the extensions version goes faster
than the core part for example).
What's your opinion ?
Regards
JB
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Are they packaged in a way that turning them into OSGi bundles is even
> possible ?
> I'm mostly thinking about split packages: if the same package is provided by
> two different jars (each one contributing a few classes to the package), it
> won't work in OSGi and we'd have to turn them into a single bundle.
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> I'm working on SMXCOMP-611 to provide bundles required by CXF.
>>
>> I have question regarding abdera bundle.
>>
>> Currently, we have an abdera-0.4.0-incubating bundle linked to the
>> abdera-core dependency.
>>
>> CXF required other abdera dependency.
>>
>> I propose to create the following new bundles:
>> - abdera-core-1.0
>> - abdera-client-1.0
>> - abdera-i18n-1.0
>> - abdera-parser-1.0
>> - abdera-spring-1.0
>> - abdera-extensions-geo-1.0
>> - abdera-extensions-html-1.0
>> - abdera-extensions-json-1.0
>> - abdera-extensions-main-1.0
>>
>> Does it make sense for you ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Abdera bundles
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Are they packaged in a way that turning them into OSGi bundles is even
possible ?
I'm mostly thinking about split packages: if the same package is provided by
two different jars (each one contributing a few classes to the package), it
won't work in OSGi and we'd have to turn them into a single bundle.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I'm working on SMXCOMP-611 to provide bundles required by CXF.
>
> I have question regarding abdera bundle.
>
> Currently, we have an abdera-0.4.0-incubating bundle linked to the
> abdera-core dependency.
>
> CXF required other abdera dependency.
>
> I propose to create the following new bundles:
> - abdera-core-1.0
> - abdera-client-1.0
> - abdera-i18n-1.0
> - abdera-parser-1.0
> - abdera-spring-1.0
> - abdera-extensions-geo-1.0
> - abdera-extensions-html-1.0
> - abdera-extensions-json-1.0
> - abdera-extensions-main-1.0
>
> Does it make sense for you ?
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> JB
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com