0.8 beta release status

[Jun Rao <ju...@gmail.com>]

We are investigating a metadata related issue when there are a large number
of clients (1000+). This issue, if not resolved, may cause the whole
cluster to be unavailable. We are testing a fix. Once the issue is
resolved, we can start the release process.

Thanks,

Jun

Re: 0.8 beta release status

[Jun Rao <ju...@gmail.com>]

Yes, we will include the revision tag in the vote. The minimal check is to
run the quickstart.

Thanks,

Jun


On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 6:40 AM, David Arthur <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Once there is a release candidate, could you send around instructions for
> validating the candidate?
>
> I.e., clone version X of the repo, run tests, startup the server with bin
> scripts, do some stuff, etc
>
> There are probably many folks like myself who have been too busy to help
> directly with the release but would be happy to help test it
>
> -David
>
>
> On 5/8/13 11:30 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
>
>> We are investigating a metadata related issue when there are a large
>> number
>> of clients (1000+). This issue, if not resolved, may cause the whole
>> cluster to be unavailable. We are testing a fix. Once the issue is
>> resolved, we can start the release process.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jun
>>
>>
>

Re: 0.8 beta release status

[David Arthur <mu...@gmail.com>]

Once there is a release candidate, could you send around instructions 
for validating the candidate?

I.e., clone version X of the repo, run tests, startup the server with 
bin scripts, do some stuff, etc

There are probably many folks like myself who have been too busy to help 
directly with the release but would be happy to help test it

-David

On 5/8/13 11:30 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
> We are investigating a metadata related issue when there are a large number
> of clients (1000+). This issue, if not resolved, may cause the whole
> cluster to be unavailable. We are testing a fix. Once the issue is
> resolved, we can start the release process.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>