You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2002/11/29 17:06:18 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14961] New: - Call.getOutputParameters returns a map with the parameter names as QNames

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14961>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14961

Call.getOutputParameters returns a map with the parameter names as QNames

           Summary: Call.getOutputParameters returns a map with the
                    parameter names as QNames
           Product: Axis
           Version: current (nightly)
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Other
         Component: Basic Architecture
        AssignedTo: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
        ReportedBy: cchabanois@cognicase.fr


According to the specification, call.getOutputParameters should return a map
with the parameter names as strings :
 
(http://java.sun.com/webservices/docs/1.0/api/javax/xml/rpc/Call.html#getOutputParams)
 "
 getOutputParams
 public java.util.Map getOutputParams()
 Returns a Map of {name, value} for the output parameters of the last invoked
 operation. 
 The parameter names in the returned Map are of type java.lang.String.
 Returns:
 Map Output parameters for the last Call.invoke(). Empty Map is returned if
 there are no output parameters
 "

WSIF - Is it dead?

Posted by easter <ea...@free.fr>.
I've noticed since my subscription to this list, that no-one at all 
seems to use WSIF, or (less likely) it's too well documented and 
bug-free to warrant any
mailing list discussions.

Is there something else I should be using instead? Is it going to go away?

I've found nothing else which allows me to generically and dynamically 
connect 2 web services together using nothing
more than their WSDL descriptions.
I feel since I seem to be the only one on the planet to do this, perhaps 
I'm doing something wrong?

Cheers.
WH