JK1 vs JK2 connector

[Michael Sudkamp <mi...@docware.de>]

Hello,

I have used the 'old' JK connector for a long time with Tomcat 4.0 and 4.1 and IIS. I had never any problems with stability.
Very recently I figured out how to set up the JK2 connector (thanks Daniel).

Now I wonder if I should from now use JK2 instead. What are the pros and cons?

Best regards

Michael


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: JK1 vs JK2 connector

[Tim Funk <fu...@joedog.org>]

Most likely jk1 is more stable than jk2. Both rely on the same wire protocol 
so tomcat really won't know the difference, the difference is in the 
webserver configuration.

If you want to go wiht jk2, there is a new release on the horizon. But if its 
anything like the jk1 release, we thought that too and 3+ months later - it 
popped out.

jk2 seems to have more developer interest in features than jk1. jk1 is 
feature complete for those who are the ones actively maintaining it so there 
aren't any ithces to scratch for them.

-Tim



Michael Sudkamp wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have used the 'old' JK connector for a long time with Tomcat 4.0 and 4.1 and IIS. I had never any problems with stability.
> Very recently I figured out how to set up the JK2 connector (thanks Daniel).
> 
> Now I wonder if I should from now use JK2 instead. What are the pros and cons?
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org