You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Colm O hEigeartaigh <co...@apache.org> on 2022/10/18 20:49:31 UTC
[DISCUSS] - Retire CXF DOSGI?
Hi all,
What do you think about moving CXF DOSGI to the attic? There is very
little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago -
https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/commits/main). It's just a
maintenance burden unless someone steps up to maintain it properly.
Colm.
Re: [DISCUSS] - Retire CXF DOSGI?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Colm
Yes, I think it makes sense. I don't think CXF DOSGi is heavily used.
Regards
JB
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:49 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh
<co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> What do you think about moving CXF DOSGI to the attic? There is very
> little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago -
> https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/commits/main). It's just a
> maintenance burden unless someone steps up to maintain it properly.
>
> Colm.
Re: [DISCUSS] - Retire CXF DOSGI?
Posted by Jim Ma <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1. It makes sense to retire it.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 4:49 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh <co...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What do you think about moving CXF DOSGI to the attic? There is very
> little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago -
> https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/commits/main). It's just a
> maintenance burden unless someone steps up to maintain it properly.
>
> Colm.
>
Re: [DISCUSS] - Retire CXF DOSGI?
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
We definitely don't use it in TomEE. As noted already there are definitely no plans in Jakarta to adopt OSGi -- even support for modules isn't required or in any current plans.
-David
> On Oct 19, 2022, at 5:49 AM, Alessio Soldano <as...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I agree, especially considering the Jakarta aspect.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 2:29 AM Andriy Redko <dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Colm,
>>
>> I have never seen it used in the wild (at least, the projects I was/am
>> involved with), I think it would make sense to retire it, especially taking
>> into account the OSGi vague plans to support Jakarta. +1 from my side to
>> move it to the attic. Thank you.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Andriy Redko
>>
>>
>> COh> Hi all,
>>
>> COh> What do you think about moving CXF DOSGI to the attic? There is very
>> COh> little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago -
>> COh> https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/commits/main). It's just a
>> COh> maintenance burden unless someone steps up to maintain it properly.
>>
>> COh> Colm.
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] - Retire CXF DOSGI?
Posted by Alessio Soldano <as...@apache.org>.
I agree, especially considering the Jakarta aspect.
Thanks
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 2:29 AM Andriy Redko <dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Colm,
>
> I have never seen it used in the wild (at least, the projects I was/am
> involved with), I think it would make sense to retire it, especially taking
> into account the OSGi vague plans to support Jakarta. +1 from my side to
> move it to the attic. Thank you.
>
> Best Regards,
> Andriy Redko
>
>
> COh> Hi all,
>
> COh> What do you think about moving CXF DOSGI to the attic? There is very
> COh> little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago -
> COh> https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/commits/main). It's just a
> COh> maintenance burden unless someone steps up to maintain it properly.
>
> COh> Colm.
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] - Retire CXF DOSGI?
Posted by Andriy Redko <dr...@gmail.com>.
Hi Colm,
I have never seen it used in the wild (at least, the projects I was/am
involved with), I think it would make sense to retire it, especially taking
into account the OSGi vague plans to support Jakarta. +1 from my side to
move it to the attic. Thank you.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
COh> Hi all,
COh> What do you think about moving CXF DOSGI to the attic? There is very
COh> little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago -
COh> https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/commits/main). It's just a
COh> maintenance burden unless someone steps up to maintain it properly.
COh> Colm.
Re: [DISCUSS] - Retire CXF DOSGI?
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
+1 to move it to the attic.
Thanks!
Freeman
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 4:49 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh <co...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What do you think about moving CXF DOSGI to the attic? There is very
> little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago -
> https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/commits/main). It's just a
> maintenance burden unless someone steps up to maintain it properly.
>
> Colm.
>