request an SIS release 1.3

[Steven Reynolds <st...@int.com.INVALID>]

Hi

I would like to request an SIS release 1.3 so that we can get the fix for
the mercator wraparound bug. We'd like to incorporate this fix into OSDU
milestone 15 if possible.

thank you
Steven

-- 
*Steven Reynolds*

*Senior  Project Manager*



*Office:* +1 (713) 975-7434

steven.reynolds@geotoolkit.net

*INT *| *Empowering Visualization*

Status of SIS 1.3 release candidate

[Martin Desruisseaux <ma...@geomatys.com>]

Hello all

The work on SIS 1.3 release candidate is not yet finished, but it is 
close. The reason for the delay is that I try to minimize the risk of 
compatibility breaks in future SIS releases regarding the 
org.apache.sis.metadata.iso.quality package. That package has been 
upgraded from ISO 19115:2003 to 19157:2013 in SIS 1.3 [1][2]. The 
following issues needed to be resolved before release for improving API 
stability:

  * Unified parameter API [3].
  * Anticipate more changes to come with ISO 19157:2022 [4].
  * Starts migration from Date (Java 1) to temporal objects (Java 8) [5].

The changes in GeoAPI interfaces described by those GitGub issues are 
not yet part of any approved GeoAPI releases and may change according 
OGC Working Group decisions. Apache SIS implements OGC GeoAPI 3.0.1. But 
SIS anticipates proposed evolution by referencing directly the SIS 
implementation classes when the GeoAPI interface is not available, and 
we try to align those implementation classes as much as possible to what 
they may be after an approved OGC GeoAPI 3.1/4.0 release.

     Martin

[1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-394
[2]https://github.com/opengeospatial/geoapi/issues/44
[3]https://github.com/opengeospatial/geoapi/issues/74
[4]https://github.com/opengeospatial/geoapi/issues/80
[5]https://github.com/opengeospatial/geoapi/issues/79

Re: request an SIS release 1.3

[Martin Desruisseaux <ma...@geomatys.com>]

Hello Steven

Indeed, it is a good time for a SIS release as it would be about 6 
months after last release. I was waiting to synchronize with OSDU 
release because OSDU provides extensive testing of coordinate 
transformations. I will try to have a release candidate ready in staging 
repository this week. The work to do is to finish a merge in progress 
about ISO 19157 (data quality), verify if any dependency needs to be 
upgraded, verify if javadoc is okay and do some extensive testing. After 
Release Candidate 1 (RC1) is in staging repository, the plan is to leave 
it there for a time long enough for OSDU release 15 testing. If any 
issue is reported, a RC2 will be prepared. If there is no issue, RC1 
will become directly the final release.

     Martin