You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jclouds.apache.org by Timur Sungur <ti...@gmail.com> on 2013/11/24 07:57:25 UTC
Re: New Blobstore Provider Implementation
Hi,
I have a short question. Can I add Jackson dependency for json processing?
Using Gson is more cumbersome and results are not that good with
respect to Jackson.
I'm using it to serialize and de-serialize domain specific objects.
Regards,
Timur
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Everett Toews
<ev...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> I don't know if this was from the same person but the same question came up on StackOverflow [1]. I answered it there and most of it was cribbed from Ignasi comments [3]. Thanks again, Ignasi!
>
> I invite you all to edit my answer on SO and when were happy with it, I'll copy it into the wiki and maybe we can get this question answered once and for all. ;)
>
> Thanks,
> Everet
>
> [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19571901/information-about-jclouds/19592104#19592104
>
>
> On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:06 AM, Andrew Phillips wrote:
>
>> Hi Timur
>>
>>> Could you please tell me how do you accept contributions and what still
>>> needs to be done so that this contribution can also reside with existing
>>> providers?
>>
>> Thanks for contributing! The basic details can be found on the "Contributing to jclouds" page [1]; one important thing to note for new providers is that the pull request should be opened against the jclouds-labs repository [2].
>>
>> For some very useful style and implementation tips, see Ignasi's recent comment to a different "new provider" pull request [3]. Thanks again, Ignasi!
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> ap
>>
>> [1] http://jclouds.incubator.apache.org/documentation/devguides/contributing-to-jclouds/
>> [2] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs
>> [3] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/188#issuecomment-26856785
>
Re: New Blobstore Provider Implementation
Posted by Timur Sungur <ti...@gmail.com>.
Hi everyone,
I made a pull request for the Orion BlobStore provider.
Regards,
Timur
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Timur Sungur <ti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ignasi,
>
> By cumbersome and not good, I mean requires lots of configurations for
> simple serializations and additional coding to compared to Jackson and
> still after those the results can be not as expected :-)
>
> Thanks for the help offer, I will contact you if the problem persists.
>
> Regards,
>
> Timur
>
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Ignasi <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Could you detail what "cumbersome" and "not good" mean in your case and
>> what issues are you experiencing?
>>
>> Gson is a core dependency in jclouds and currently there is not an easy way
>> to change that. Many components assume Gson, and I'm not sure adding
>> Jackson just for a single provider would be a good idea (even if the dep
>> resides only in the provider). We should try to have one common way to
>> serialize/deserialize (this gains importance when having to maintain all
>> providers and deal with the particularities of each one).
>>
>> Serialization should be as easy as building the java domain objects
>> matching the json model. Are you having trouble with that?
>>
>> I can help with this either in this thread or in the IRC if you prefer
>> (you'll find me as nacx).
>>
>> HTH!
>>
>> Ignasi
>> El 24/11/2013 07:57, "Timur Sungur" <ti...@gmail.com> escribió:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a short question. Can I add Jackson dependency for json processing?
>>>
>>> Using Gson is more cumbersome and results are not that good with
>>> respect to Jackson.
>>>
>>> I'm using it to serialize and de-serialize domain specific objects.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Timur
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Everett Toews
>>> <ev...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>>> > I don't know if this was from the same person but the same question came
>>> up on StackOverflow [1]. I answered it there and most of it was cribbed
>>> from Ignasi comments [3]. Thanks again, Ignasi!
>>> >
>>> > I invite you all to edit my answer on SO and when were happy with it,
>>> I'll copy it into the wiki and maybe we can get this question answered once
>>> and for all. ;)
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Everet
>>> >
>>> > [1]
>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19571901/information-about-jclouds/19592104#19592104
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:06 AM, Andrew Phillips wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi Timur
>>> >>
>>> >>> Could you please tell me how do you accept contributions and what still
>>> >>> needs to be done so that this contribution can also reside with
>>> existing
>>> >>> providers?
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks for contributing! The basic details can be found on the
>>> "Contributing to jclouds" page [1]; one important thing to note for new
>>> providers is that the pull request should be opened against the
>>> jclouds-labs repository [2].
>>> >>
>>> >> For some very useful style and implementation tips, see Ignasi's recent
>>> comment to a different "new provider" pull request [3]. Thanks again,
>>> Ignasi!
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards
>>> >>
>>> >> ap
>>> >>
>>> >> [1]
>>> http://jclouds.incubator.apache.org/documentation/devguides/contributing-to-jclouds/
>>> >> [2] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs
>>> >> [3] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/188#issuecomment-26856785
>>> >
>>>
Re: New Blobstore Provider Implementation
Posted by Timur Sungur <ti...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ignasi,
By cumbersome and not good, I mean requires lots of configurations for
simple serializations and additional coding to compared to Jackson and
still after those the results can be not as expected :-)
Thanks for the help offer, I will contact you if the problem persists.
Regards,
Timur
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Ignasi <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could you detail what "cumbersome" and "not good" mean in your case and
> what issues are you experiencing?
>
> Gson is a core dependency in jclouds and currently there is not an easy way
> to change that. Many components assume Gson, and I'm not sure adding
> Jackson just for a single provider would be a good idea (even if the dep
> resides only in the provider). We should try to have one common way to
> serialize/deserialize (this gains importance when having to maintain all
> providers and deal with the particularities of each one).
>
> Serialization should be as easy as building the java domain objects
> matching the json model. Are you having trouble with that?
>
> I can help with this either in this thread or in the IRC if you prefer
> (you'll find me as nacx).
>
> HTH!
>
> Ignasi
> El 24/11/2013 07:57, "Timur Sungur" <ti...@gmail.com> escribió:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a short question. Can I add Jackson dependency for json processing?
>>
>> Using Gson is more cumbersome and results are not that good with
>> respect to Jackson.
>>
>> I'm using it to serialize and de-serialize domain specific objects.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Timur
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Everett Toews
>> <ev...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>> > I don't know if this was from the same person but the same question came
>> up on StackOverflow [1]. I answered it there and most of it was cribbed
>> from Ignasi comments [3]. Thanks again, Ignasi!
>> >
>> > I invite you all to edit my answer on SO and when were happy with it,
>> I'll copy it into the wiki and maybe we can get this question answered once
>> and for all. ;)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Everet
>> >
>> > [1]
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19571901/information-about-jclouds/19592104#19592104
>> >
>> >
>> > On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:06 AM, Andrew Phillips wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Timur
>> >>
>> >>> Could you please tell me how do you accept contributions and what still
>> >>> needs to be done so that this contribution can also reside with
>> existing
>> >>> providers?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for contributing! The basic details can be found on the
>> "Contributing to jclouds" page [1]; one important thing to note for new
>> providers is that the pull request should be opened against the
>> jclouds-labs repository [2].
>> >>
>> >> For some very useful style and implementation tips, see Ignasi's recent
>> comment to a different "new provider" pull request [3]. Thanks again,
>> Ignasi!
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >>
>> >> ap
>> >>
>> >> [1]
>> http://jclouds.incubator.apache.org/documentation/devguides/contributing-to-jclouds/
>> >> [2] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs
>> >> [3] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/188#issuecomment-26856785
>> >
>>
Re: New Blobstore Provider Implementation
Posted by Ignasi <ig...@gmail.com>.
Could you detail what "cumbersome" and "not good" mean in your case and
what issues are you experiencing?
Gson is a core dependency in jclouds and currently there is not an easy way
to change that. Many components assume Gson, and I'm not sure adding
Jackson just for a single provider would be a good idea (even if the dep
resides only in the provider). We should try to have one common way to
serialize/deserialize (this gains importance when having to maintain all
providers and deal with the particularities of each one).
Serialization should be as easy as building the java domain objects
matching the json model. Are you having trouble with that?
I can help with this either in this thread or in the IRC if you prefer
(you'll find me as nacx).
HTH!
Ignasi
El 24/11/2013 07:57, "Timur Sungur" <ti...@gmail.com> escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I have a short question. Can I add Jackson dependency for json processing?
>
> Using Gson is more cumbersome and results are not that good with
> respect to Jackson.
>
> I'm using it to serialize and de-serialize domain specific objects.
>
> Regards,
>
> Timur
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Everett Toews
> <ev...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> > I don't know if this was from the same person but the same question came
> up on StackOverflow [1]. I answered it there and most of it was cribbed
> from Ignasi comments [3]. Thanks again, Ignasi!
> >
> > I invite you all to edit my answer on SO and when were happy with it,
> I'll copy it into the wiki and maybe we can get this question answered once
> and for all. ;)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Everet
> >
> > [1]
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19571901/information-about-jclouds/19592104#19592104
> >
> >
> > On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:06 AM, Andrew Phillips wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Timur
> >>
> >>> Could you please tell me how do you accept contributions and what still
> >>> needs to be done so that this contribution can also reside with
> existing
> >>> providers?
> >>
> >> Thanks for contributing! The basic details can be found on the
> "Contributing to jclouds" page [1]; one important thing to note for new
> providers is that the pull request should be opened against the
> jclouds-labs repository [2].
> >>
> >> For some very useful style and implementation tips, see Ignasi's recent
> comment to a different "new provider" pull request [3]. Thanks again,
> Ignasi!
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> ap
> >>
> >> [1]
> http://jclouds.incubator.apache.org/documentation/devguides/contributing-to-jclouds/
> >> [2] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs
> >> [3] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/188#issuecomment-26856785
> >
>