You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by Marc Prud'hommeaux <mp...@apache.org> on 2007/02/13 09:08:40 UTC
[VOTE RESULT] Move JPA API dependency from dev.java.net to geronimo version
With 7 votes in favor and none against, the vote passes!
The vote thread can be viewed at:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-open-jpa-dev/
200702.mbox/%3cDF2A0924-993C-4001-B5AA-EA3F9E8FA576@apache.org%3e
I've updated the dependencies in the pom.xml file and committed.
Thanks to all who voted!
On Feb 9, 2007, at 6:09 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> +1
>
> On Feb 9, 2007, at 12:41 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>
>>
>> It turns out that the JPA API we've been building against (the one
>> from https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/repository/
>> javax.persistence/jars/persistence-api-1.0.jar) is not actually
>> the final version of the spec: there are some minor (and binary-
>> compatible) changes (some annotations don't have runtime
>> retention, for example), but they are enough to prevent us from
>> passing all the compatibility tests we need.
>>
>> The Geronimo API jar (http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/
>> maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec/geronimo-
>> jpa_3.0_spec-1.0.jar) is compliant, as far as I can tell.
>>
>> How do people feel about changing the dependency from persistence-
>> api-1.0.jar to geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0.jar? I've run through all
>> our tests, and they pass with the Geronimo version. This would
>> have the added advantage of unifying our spec jars to all be using
>> the Geronimo versions.
>>
>> +1 indicates that you approve of the change
>> -1 indicated that you disagree that the change should be made
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>