You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> on 2008/03/14 08:32:12 UTC
[VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/
It's built from an export of
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC2
and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3.
Note: The findbugs and cobertura reports are commented out in the
pom.xml because they were causing OutOfMemory errors. One of the
website files will need updating with the release date.
Changes since RC1 are:
* Fix to project.xml and pom.xml so the developer lists are the same.
* Hardcode the version into the src/assembly/src.xml to get around a Maven bug.
* Fix to the site nav javadoc link to be 2.4 and not 2.3.
Should we release it?
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
Thanks,
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Time & effort? :)
1.1 and 1.2 on Linux are painful too. Needs an old linux. Otherwise
you need a Windows machine, which I don't have a spare one of.
Hen
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org> wrote:
> Henri, why not setup Continuum to run all these jdk versions?
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 5:32 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 15/03/2008, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Compiling against 1.2, we have only one inconsistency. The enums
> > > > package uses WeakHashMap's Map constructor. That wasn't added until
> > > > 1.3. Not that I could get my JDK 1.2.2 install and the Ant 1.5.4
> > > > install to work happily together [or Ant 1.7.0]; however using javac
> > > > by hand showed that the above is the only problem.
> > > >
> > > > I'm going to change that code to use the empty constructor and then
> > > > use putAll(Map).
> > > >
> > > > I can't download 1.1 currently, Sun's site is down. However,
> > > > WeakHashMap wasn't available until 1.2 and I don't see us changing
> > > > that. So despite the target JDK of 1.1, we are 1.2 dependent in
> > > > reality.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I downloaded 1.1 and 1.2 OK yesterday to see if I could test with them.
> > >
> > > But I could not get them to work with Ant (maybe I was using the wrong
> > > version - I tried 1.6.0 with Java 1.2.2). "ant -version" works, but
> > > "ant -p" says:
> > >
> > > A nonfatal internal JIT (3.10.107(x)) error 'chgTarg: Conditional' has
> > > occurred in :
> > > 'org/apache/tools/ant/Project.addReference
> > > (Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/Object;)V': Interpreting method.
> >
> > I got the same thing, with both 1.5.4 [which claims to work with JDK
> > 1.1, so surely it works with JDK 1.2] and 1.7.0.
> >
> > > What did you use for testing with 1.2? Just curious.
> >
> > cd src\java\
> > javac org\apache\commons\lang\*.java
> >
> > and then repeated for the other packages :) There is no spoon.
> >
> > Hen
> >
>
>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
Posted by Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org>.
Henri, why not setup Continuum to run all these jdk versions?
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 5:32 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 15/03/2008, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Compiling against 1.2, we have only one inconsistency. The enums
> > > package uses WeakHashMap's Map constructor. That wasn't added until
> > > 1.3. Not that I could get my JDK 1.2.2 install and the Ant 1.5.4
> > > install to work happily together [or Ant 1.7.0]; however using javac
> > > by hand showed that the above is the only problem.
> > >
> > > I'm going to change that code to use the empty constructor and then
> > > use putAll(Map).
> > >
> > > I can't download 1.1 currently, Sun's site is down. However,
> > > WeakHashMap wasn't available until 1.2 and I don't see us changing
> > > that. So despite the target JDK of 1.1, we are 1.2 dependent in
> > > reality.
> > >
> >
> > I downloaded 1.1 and 1.2 OK yesterday to see if I could test with them.
> >
> > But I could not get them to work with Ant (maybe I was using the wrong
> > version - I tried 1.6.0 with Java 1.2.2). "ant -version" works, but
> > "ant -p" says:
> >
> > A nonfatal internal JIT (3.10.107(x)) error 'chgTarg: Conditional' has
> > occurred in :
> > 'org/apache/tools/ant/Project.addReference
> > (Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/Object;)V': Interpreting method.
>
> I got the same thing, with both 1.5.4 [which claims to work with JDK
> 1.1, so surely it works with JDK 1.2] and 1.7.0.
>
> > What did you use for testing with 1.2? Just curious.
>
> cd src\java\
> javac org\apache\commons\lang\*.java
>
> and then repeated for the other packages :) There is no spoon.
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 5:32 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15/03/2008, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Compiling against 1.2, we have only one inconsistency. The enums
> > package uses WeakHashMap's Map constructor. That wasn't added until
> > 1.3. Not that I could get my JDK 1.2.2 install and the Ant 1.5.4
> > install to work happily together [or Ant 1.7.0]; however using javac
> > by hand showed that the above is the only problem.
> >
> > I'm going to change that code to use the empty constructor and then
> > use putAll(Map).
> >
> > I can't download 1.1 currently, Sun's site is down. However,
> > WeakHashMap wasn't available until 1.2 and I don't see us changing
> > that. So despite the target JDK of 1.1, we are 1.2 dependent in
> > reality.
> >
>
> I downloaded 1.1 and 1.2 OK yesterday to see if I could test with them.
>
> But I could not get them to work with Ant (maybe I was using the wrong
> version - I tried 1.6.0 with Java 1.2.2). "ant -version" works, but
> "ant -p" says:
>
> A nonfatal internal JIT (3.10.107(x)) error 'chgTarg: Conditional' has
> occurred in :
> 'org/apache/tools/ant/Project.addReference
> (Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/Object;)V': Interpreting method.
I got the same thing, with both 1.5.4 [which claims to work with JDK
1.1, so surely it works with JDK 1.2] and 1.7.0.
> What did you use for testing with 1.2? Just curious.
cd src\java\
javac org\apache\commons\lang\*.java
and then repeated for the other packages :) There is no spoon.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 15/03/2008, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Compiling against 1.2, we have only one inconsistency. The enums
> package uses WeakHashMap's Map constructor. That wasn't added until
> 1.3. Not that I could get my JDK 1.2.2 install and the Ant 1.5.4
> install to work happily together [or Ant 1.7.0]; however using javac
> by hand showed that the above is the only problem.
>
> I'm going to change that code to use the empty constructor and then
> use putAll(Map).
>
> I can't download 1.1 currently, Sun's site is down. However,
> WeakHashMap wasn't available until 1.2 and I don't see us changing
> that. So despite the target JDK of 1.1, we are 1.2 dependent in
> reality.
>
I downloaded 1.1 and 1.2 OK yesterday to see if I could test with them.
But I could not get them to work with Ant (maybe I was using the wrong
version - I tried 1.6.0 with Java 1.2.2). "ant -version" works, but
"ant -p" says:
A nonfatal internal JIT (3.10.107(x)) error 'chgTarg: Conditional' has
occurred in :
'org/apache/tools/ant/Project.addReference
(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/Object;)V': Interpreting method.
What did you use for testing with 1.2? Just curious.
> Hen
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Gary Gregory
> <GG...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote:
> > The build looks good on all 9 SDKs I tested:
> > http://garygregory.com/os/builds/commons-lang-2.4/index.html
> >
> > In the Jar manifest I see:
> >
> > X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.3
> > X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.1
> >
> > I know our sources are 1.3 compatible since I just tried it (see report above).
> >
> > But 1.1 compatible? I doubt that. It seems like both should be 1.3.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Gary
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flamefew@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 12:32 AM
> > > To: Commons Developers List
> > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
> > >
> > > Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/
> > >
> > > It's built from an export of
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC2
> > > and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3.
> > >
> > > Note: The findbugs and cobertura reports are commented out in the
> > > pom.xml because they were causing OutOfMemory errors. One of the
> > > website files will need updating with the release date.
> > >
> > > Changes since RC1 are:
> > >
> > > * Fix to project.xml and pom.xml so the developer lists are the same.
> > > * Hardcode the version into the src/assembly/src.xml to get around a Maven bug.
> > > * Fix to the site nav javadoc link to be 2.4 and not 2.3.
> > >
> > > Should we release it?
> > >
> > > [ ] +1
> > > [ ] -1
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> >
> >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Gary Gregory
<GG...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flamefew@gmail.com]
>
> > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 11:11 PM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
> >
> > Compiling against 1.2, we have only one inconsistency. The enums
> > package uses WeakHashMap's Map constructor. That wasn't added until
> > 1.3. Not that I could get my JDK 1.2.2 install and the Ant 1.5.4
> > install to work happily together [or Ant 1.7.0]; however using javac
> > by hand showed that the above is the only problem.
> >
> > I'm going to change that code to use the empty constructor and then
> > use putAll(Map).
> >
> > I can't download 1.1 currently, Sun's site is down. However,
> > WeakHashMap wasn't available until 1.2 and I don't see us changing
> > that. So despite the target JDK of 1.1, we are 1.2 dependent in
> > reality.
>
> So X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.1 will be changed to 1.2, right?
Hold your horses :)
Just did it.
I'll wait til tomorrow night to do an RC3. In case anyone finds anything else.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
Posted by Gary Gregory <GG...@seagullsoftware.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flamefew@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 11:11 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
>
> Compiling against 1.2, we have only one inconsistency. The enums
> package uses WeakHashMap's Map constructor. That wasn't added until
> 1.3. Not that I could get my JDK 1.2.2 install and the Ant 1.5.4
> install to work happily together [or Ant 1.7.0]; however using javac
> by hand showed that the above is the only problem.
>
> I'm going to change that code to use the empty constructor and then
> use putAll(Map).
>
> I can't download 1.1 currently, Sun's site is down. However,
> WeakHashMap wasn't available until 1.2 and I don't see us changing
> that. So despite the target JDK of 1.1, we are 1.2 dependent in
> reality.
So X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.1 will be changed to 1.2, right?
Gary
>
> Hen
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Gary Gregory
> <GG...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote:
> > The build looks good on all 9 SDKs I tested:
> > http://garygregory.com/os/builds/commons-lang-2.4/index.html
> >
> > In the Jar manifest I see:
> >
> > X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.3
> > X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.1
> >
> > I know our sources are 1.3 compatible since I just tried it (see report above).
> >
> > But 1.1 compatible? I doubt that. It seems like both should be 1.3.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Gary
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flamefew@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 12:32 AM
> > > To: Commons Developers List
> > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
> > >
> > > Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/
> > >
> > > It's built from an export of
> > >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC2
> > > and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3.
> > >
> > > Note: The findbugs and cobertura reports are commented out in the
> > > pom.xml because they were causing OutOfMemory errors. One of the
> > > website files will need updating with the release date.
> > >
> > > Changes since RC1 are:
> > >
> > > * Fix to project.xml and pom.xml so the developer lists are the same.
> > > * Hardcode the version into the src/assembly/src.xml to get around a Maven
> bug.
> > > * Fix to the site nav javadoc link to be 2.4 and not 2.3.
> > >
> > > Should we release it?
> > >
> > > [ ] +1
> > > [ ] -1
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> >
> >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Compiling against 1.2, we have only one inconsistency. The enums
package uses WeakHashMap's Map constructor. That wasn't added until
1.3. Not that I could get my JDK 1.2.2 install and the Ant 1.5.4
install to work happily together [or Ant 1.7.0]; however using javac
by hand showed that the above is the only problem.
I'm going to change that code to use the empty constructor and then
use putAll(Map).
I can't download 1.1 currently, Sun's site is down. However,
WeakHashMap wasn't available until 1.2 and I don't see us changing
that. So despite the target JDK of 1.1, we are 1.2 dependent in
reality.
Hen
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Gary Gregory
<GG...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote:
> The build looks good on all 9 SDKs I tested:
> http://garygregory.com/os/builds/commons-lang-2.4/index.html
>
> In the Jar manifest I see:
>
> X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.3
> X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.1
>
> I know our sources are 1.3 compatible since I just tried it (see report above).
>
> But 1.1 compatible? I doubt that. It seems like both should be 1.3.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flamefew@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 12:32 AM
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
> >
> > Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/
> >
> > It's built from an export of
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC2
> > and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3.
> >
> > Note: The findbugs and cobertura reports are commented out in the
> > pom.xml because they were causing OutOfMemory errors. One of the
> > website files will need updating with the release date.
> >
> > Changes since RC1 are:
> >
> > * Fix to project.xml and pom.xml so the developer lists are the same.
> > * Hardcode the version into the src/assembly/src.xml to get around a Maven bug.
> > * Fix to the site nav javadoc link to be 2.4 and not 2.3.
> >
> > Should we release it?
> >
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] -1
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Hen
> >
>
>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
Posted by Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <th...@gmail.com>.
Gary Gregory skrev den 15-03-2008 02:08:
> The build looks good on all 9 SDKs I tested:
> http://garygregory.com/os/builds/commons-lang-2.4/index.html
>
>
In case you are interested the IBM JDK is available as part of their IBM
Developer package for Java.
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/eclipse/
--
Thorbjørn
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
On 3/14/08, Gary Gregory <GG...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote:
> The build looks good on all 9 SDKs I tested:
Ok, me browsing through the SVN tag now seems completely inadequate! :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
Posted by Gary Gregory <GG...@seagullsoftware.com>.
The build looks good on all 9 SDKs I tested:
http://garygregory.com/os/builds/commons-lang-2.4/index.html
In the Jar manifest I see:
X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.3
X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.1
I know our sources are 1.3 compatible since I just tried it (see report above).
But 1.1 compatible? I doubt that. It seems like both should be 1.3.
Thoughts?
Thank you,
Gary
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flamefew@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 12:32 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
>
> Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/
>
> It's built from an export of
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC2
> and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3.
>
> Note: The findbugs and cobertura reports are commented out in the
> pom.xml because they were causing OutOfMemory errors. One of the
> website files will need updating with the release date.
>
> Changes since RC1 are:
>
> * Fix to project.xml and pom.xml so the developer lists are the same.
> * Hardcode the version into the src/assembly/src.xml to get around a Maven bug.
> * Fix to the site nav javadoc link to be 2.4 and not 2.3.
>
> Should we release it?
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/
> > >
> >
> > Sigs etc are fine.
> >
> > Ant 1.6.5 and Maven 1.0.2 test OK using Java 1.3.1
> >
> >
> > > It's built from an export of
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC2
> > > and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3.
> > >
> > > Note: The findbugs and cobertura reports are commented out in the
> > > pom.xml because they were causing OutOfMemory errors. One of the
> > > website files will need updating with the release date.
> > >
> > > Changes since RC1 are:
> > >
> > > * Fix to project.xml and pom.xml so the developer lists are the same.
> > > * Hardcode the version into the src/assembly/src.xml to get around a Maven bug.
> > > * Fix to the site nav javadoc link to be 2.4 and not 2.3.
> > >
> > > Should we release it?
> >
> > It's not easy finding out which versions of Java are supported.
> >
> > The only reference I could find was in the User Manual:
> >
> > "Lang seeks to support Java 1.2 onwards ..."
> >
> > which does not actually promise anything.
> >
> > Please can the supported Java version(s) be documented more clearly?
>
>
> Will do. Can it be on the website, or does it mean another RC?
Website will do.
> I want to update the release_history page to say which version each
> supports, which means sitting down and testing each build on a Windows
> box so I can get to JDK 1.2 and 1.1(maybe). Then I'll add the 2.4
> specific note to the front page.
>
Documenting that 2.4 has been tested with 1.3 would be a start ;-)
>
> > ==
> >
> > The pom.xml <description> refers to:
> >
> > "Commons.Lang, a package of Java utility classes for the ..."
> >
> > Surely this should be "Commons Lang..." ?
> >
> > The description can also be taken to mean that Commons Lang is part of
> > java.lang.
> >
> > The descriptions on the website are better.
>
>
> Will fix. Again - rc blocker?
>
No
>
> > ==
> >
> > Minor nit:
> >
> > project.properties has the line:
> > maven.jdiff.old.tag=LANG_2_1
> >
> > that should probably be LANG_2_3.
>
>
> Yeah. Though I'm going to suggest deleting the m1 build as soon as the
> m2 build has proven itself in a release.
>
> > > [ ] +1
> > > [ ] -1
>
> Any of those blockers? With RM hat on, none of them seem blockers to me.
>
No. Agreed.
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/
> >
>
> Sigs etc are fine.
>
> Ant 1.6.5 and Maven 1.0.2 test OK using Java 1.3.1
>
>
> > It's built from an export of
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC2
> > and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3.
> >
> > Note: The findbugs and cobertura reports are commented out in the
> > pom.xml because they were causing OutOfMemory errors. One of the
> > website files will need updating with the release date.
> >
> > Changes since RC1 are:
> >
> > * Fix to project.xml and pom.xml so the developer lists are the same.
> > * Hardcode the version into the src/assembly/src.xml to get around a Maven bug.
> > * Fix to the site nav javadoc link to be 2.4 and not 2.3.
> >
> > Should we release it?
>
> It's not easy finding out which versions of Java are supported.
>
> The only reference I could find was in the User Manual:
>
> "Lang seeks to support Java 1.2 onwards ..."
>
> which does not actually promise anything.
>
> Please can the supported Java version(s) be documented more clearly?
Will do. Can it be on the website, or does it mean another RC?
I want to update the release_history page to say which version each
supports, which means sitting down and testing each build on a Windows
box so I can get to JDK 1.2 and 1.1(maybe). Then I'll add the 2.4
specific note to the front page.
> ==
>
> The pom.xml <description> refers to:
>
> "Commons.Lang, a package of Java utility classes for the ..."
>
> Surely this should be "Commons Lang..." ?
>
> The description can also be taken to mean that Commons Lang is part of
> java.lang.
>
> The descriptions on the website are better.
Will fix. Again - rc blocker?
> ==
>
> Minor nit:
>
> project.properties has the line:
> maven.jdiff.old.tag=LANG_2_1
>
> that should probably be LANG_2_3.
Yeah. Though I'm going to suggest deleting the m1 build as soon as the
m2 build has proven itself in a release.
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] -1
Any of those blockers? With RM hat on, none of them seem blockers to me.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/
>
Sigs etc are fine.
Ant 1.6.5 and Maven 1.0.2 test OK using Java 1.3.1
> It's built from an export of
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC2
> and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3.
>
> Note: The findbugs and cobertura reports are commented out in the
> pom.xml because they were causing OutOfMemory errors. One of the
> website files will need updating with the release date.
>
> Changes since RC1 are:
>
> * Fix to project.xml and pom.xml so the developer lists are the same.
> * Hardcode the version into the src/assembly/src.xml to get around a Maven bug.
> * Fix to the site nav javadoc link to be 2.4 and not 2.3.
>
> Should we release it?
It's not easy finding out which versions of Java are supported.
The only reference I could find was in the User Manual:
"Lang seeks to support Java 1.2 onwards ..."
which does not actually promise anything.
Please can the supported Java version(s) be documented more clearly?
==
The pom.xml <description> refers to:
"Commons.Lang, a package of Java utility classes for the ..."
Surely this should be "Commons Lang..." ?
The description can also be taken to mean that Commons Lang is part of
java.lang.
The descriptions on the website are better.
==
Minor nit:
project.properties has the line:
maven.jdiff.old.tag=LANG_2_1
that should probably be LANG_2_3.
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org