You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> on 2010/09/08 15:03:27 UTC
ActiveMQ 5.4.1 release?
The axis2 release that we've been waiting on for the Geronimo server
2.2.1 release has finally started their release vote, which means we're
going to be needing a new ActiveMQ release with the fix for AMQ-2840
very shortly. We've been testing with the snapshot version with the
current fix, and this is looking good so far. Can we get a new release
soon?
Rick
Re: ActiveMQ 5.4.1 release?
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Uhm, do you want me to get used to it?
Hadrian, can I work with you on this release? I'd like to understand
everything that goes into a release these days.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: ActiveMQ 5.4.1 release?
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
Uhm, do you want me to get used to it?
Cheers,
Hadrian
On Sep 8, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
> Think it would make sense to kick one off early next week, say
> tuesday, let folks finish up anything they are working on.
> Any volunteer want to cut the release on tuesday?
>
> On 8 September 2010 14:03, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The axis2 release that we've been waiting on for the Geronimo server 2.2.1
>> release has finally started their release vote, which means we're going to
>> be needing a new ActiveMQ release with the fix for AMQ-2840 very shortly.
>> We've been testing with the snapshot version with the current fix, and this
>> is looking good so far. Can we get a new release soon?
>>
>> Rick
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://blog.garytully.com
>
> Open Source Integration
> http://fusesource.com
Re: ActiveMQ 5.4.1 release?
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
Bruce, now thanks for the help too!
Hadrian
On Sep 18, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Thanks for the offer. The release guide [1] is accurate, and that's what I follow. The release is ready, the vote email is out. What's left to do now is move the unresolved issues for 5.4.1 to 5.5.0 in the jira and then publish the artifacts after the vote. There are only 49 issues resolved in 5.4.1. I'll be out for a couple of hours and will do it afterwards. I didn't want to hold the vote thread for that, but if someone takes a peek now it will be confusing.
>
> I did look for you you on #activemq, but didn't see you.
>
> Cheers,
> Hadrian
>
> [1] http://activemq.apache.org/release-guide.html
>
>
> On Sep 17, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hadrian, Bruce,
>>> From my perspective, I think we are good to go with 5.4.1, done with changes.
>>
>> Hadrian, I'm available later tonight to work on the release if you
>> are. Let me know your availability.
>>
>> Bruce
>> --
>> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>> );'
>>
>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
Re: ActiveMQ 5.4.1 release?
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the offer. The release guide [1] is accurate, and that's what I follow. The release is ready, the vote email is out. What's left to do now is move the unresolved issues for 5.4.1 to 5.5.0 in the jira and then publish the artifacts after the vote. There are only 49 issues resolved in 5.4.1. I'll be out for a couple of hours and will do it afterwards. I didn't want to hold the vote thread for that, but if someone takes a peek now it will be confusing.
I did look for you you on #activemq, but didn't see you.
Cheers,
Hadrian
[1] http://activemq.apache.org/release-guide.html
On Sep 17, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hadrian, Bruce,
>> From my perspective, I think we are good to go with 5.4.1, done with changes.
>
> Hadrian, I'm available later tonight to work on the release if you
> are. Let me know your availability.
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: ActiveMQ 5.4.1 release?
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hadrian, Bruce,
> From my perspective, I think we are good to go with 5.4.1, done with changes.
Hadrian, I'm available later tonight to work on the release if you
are. Let me know your availability.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: ActiveMQ 5.4.1 release?
Posted by Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com>.
Hadrian, Bruce,
>From my perspective, I think we are good to go with 5.4.1, done with changes.
On 10 September 2010 08:21, Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> we will cut from trunk as all changes to date are compatible and
> relevant. Validation of the 5.5 snapshot will suffice.
>
> On Thursday, September 9, 2010, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 8, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
>>
>>> Think it would make sense to kick one off early next week, say
>>> tuesday, let folks finish up anything they are working on.
>>> Any volunteer want to cut the release on tuesday?
>>
>> Sounds great. Thanks! Is there a 5.4.x SNAPSHOT available? We could probably get a Geronimo TCK run in to verify...
>>
>> --kevan
>
> --
> http://blog.garytully.com
>
> Open Source Integration
> http://fusesource.com
>
--
http://blog.garytully.com
Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com
Re: ActiveMQ 5.4.1 release?
Posted by Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com>.
we will cut from trunk as all changes to date are compatible and
relevant. Validation of the 5.5 snapshot will suffice.
On Thursday, September 9, 2010, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
>
>> Think it would make sense to kick one off early next week, say
>> tuesday, let folks finish up anything they are working on.
>> Any volunteer want to cut the release on tuesday?
>
> Sounds great. Thanks! Is there a 5.4.x SNAPSHOT available? We could probably get a Geronimo TCK run in to verify...
>
> --kevan
--
http://blog.garytully.com
Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com
Re: ActiveMQ 5.4.1 release?
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Sep 8, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
> Think it would make sense to kick one off early next week, say
> tuesday, let folks finish up anything they are working on.
> Any volunteer want to cut the release on tuesday?
Sounds great. Thanks! Is there a 5.4.x SNAPSHOT available? We could probably get a Geronimo TCK run in to verify...
--kevan
Re: ActiveMQ 5.4.1 release?
Posted by Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com>.
Think it would make sense to kick one off early next week, say
tuesday, let folks finish up anything they are working on.
Any volunteer want to cut the release on tuesday?
On 8 September 2010 14:03, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The axis2 release that we've been waiting on for the Geronimo server 2.2.1
> release has finally started their release vote, which means we're going to
> be needing a new ActiveMQ release with the fix for AMQ-2840 very shortly.
> We've been testing with the snapshot version with the current fix, and this
> is looking good so far. Can we get a new release soon?
>
> Rick
>
--
http://blog.garytully.com
Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com