You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@tez.apache.org by Apache Jenkins Server <je...@builds.apache.org> on 2016/05/12 17:04:10 UTC
Failed: TEZ-3254 PreCommit Build #1717
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3254
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1717/
###################################################################################
########################## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ###########################
[...truncated 3878 lines...]
[ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoFailureException
[ERROR] [Help 2] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException
[ERROR]
[ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the command
[ERROR] mvn <goals> -rf :tez-dag
[INFO] Build failures were ignored.
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12803662/TEZ-3254.2.patch
against master revision 88bd5b9.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 3.0.1) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in :
org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse
Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1717//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1717//console
This message is automatically generated.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Adding comment to Jira.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Comment added.
d3877ecb803d63b2063ae622c7ca712923793c92 logged out
======================================================================
======================================================================
Finished build.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
[description-setter] Could not determine description.
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any
###################################################################################
############################## FAILED TESTS (if any) ##############################
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources
Error Message:
Wanted but not invoked:
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000004_1,
<any>,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1272)
However, there were other interactions with this mock:
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.init(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.setConfig(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.serviceInit(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.start();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.serviceStart();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.instantiateSchedulers(
"host",
0,
"",
Mock for AppContext, hashCode: 927174260
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getContainerSignatureMatcher();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getConfig();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.setApplicationRegistrationData(
0,
Mock for Resource, hashCode: 876445188,
Mock for Map, hashCode: 823939943,
null
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.setApplicationRegistrationData(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:96)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getSpyTaskScheduler();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1146)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1208)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1211)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000001_1,
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.taskAllocated(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:69)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_ENDED
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1227)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000002_1,
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.taskAllocated(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:69)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_ENDED
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1241)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1251)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000003_1,
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.taskAllocated(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:69)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_ENDED
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1259)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1269)
Stack Trace:
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.WantedButNotInvoked:
Wanted but not invoked:
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000004_1,
<any>,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1272)
However, there were other interactions with this mock:
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.init(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.setConfig(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.serviceInit(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.start();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.serviceStart();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.instantiateSchedulers(
"host",
0,
"",
Mock for AppContext, hashCode: 927174260
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getContainerSignatureMatcher();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getConfig();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.setApplicationRegistrationData(
0,
Mock for Resource, hashCode: 876445188,
Mock for Map, hashCode: 823939943,
null
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.setApplicationRegistrationData(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:96)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getSpyTaskScheduler();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1146)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1208)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1211)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000001_1,
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.taskAllocated(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:69)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_ENDED
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1227)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000002_1,
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.taskAllocated(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:69)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_ENDED
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1241)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1251)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000003_1,
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.taskAllocated(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:69)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_ENDED
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1259)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1269)
at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1272)
Success: TEZ-3206 PreCommit Build #1719
Posted by Apache Jenkins Server <je...@builds.apache.org>.
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3206
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1719/
###################################################################################
########################## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ###########################
[...truncated 4098 lines...]
[INFO] Tez ............................................... SUCCESS [ 0.048 s]
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 55:48 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2016-05-12T20:06:30+00:00
[INFO] Final Memory: 69M/940M
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12803714/TEZ-3206-2.patch
against master revision f70aa17.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 3.0.1) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in .
Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1719//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1719//console
This message is automatically generated.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Adding comment to Jira.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Comment added.
7527d6c09a47f7ac473ae3dd3b390a20caa3bde8 logged out
======================================================================
======================================================================
Finished build.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Archiving artifacts
[description-setter] Description set: TEZ-3206
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Success
Sending email for trigger: Success
###################################################################################
############################## FAILED TESTS (if any) ##############################
All tests passed
Failed: TEZ-3256 PreCommit Build #1718
Posted by Apache Jenkins Server <je...@builds.apache.org>.
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3256
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1718/
###################################################################################
########################## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ###########################
[...truncated 1477 lines...]
Running tests
/home/jenkins/tools/maven/latest/bin/mvn clean install -fn -DTezPatchProcess
cat: /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-TEZ-Build@2/../patchprocess/testrun.txt: No such file or directory
awk: cannot open /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-TEZ-Build@2/../patchprocess/testrun.txt (No such file or directory)
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12803682/TEZ-3256.1.patch
against master revision 88bd5b9.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 3.0.1) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in .
Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1718//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1718//console
This message is automatically generated.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Adding comment to Jira.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Comment added.
f0f903a9605d9a155ba106dbb749bc8174ad5619 logged out
======================================================================
======================================================================
Finished build.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Archiving artifacts
ERROR: No artifacts found that match the file pattern "patchprocess/*.*". Configuration error?
ERROR: ?patchprocess/*.*? doesn?t match anything, but ?*.*? does. Perhaps that?s what you mean?
Build step 'Archive the artifacts' changed build result to FAILURE
[description-setter] Could not determine description.
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any
###################################################################################
############################## FAILED TESTS (if any) ##############################
All tests passed