You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@arrow.apache.org by "Joris Van den Bossche (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/09/29 11:21:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (ARROW-17890) [C++][Python] Allow an ExtensionType to register or implement custom casts
Joris Van den Bossche created ARROW-17890:
---------------------------------------------
Summary: [C++][Python] Allow an ExtensionType to register or implement custom casts
Key: ARROW-17890
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17890
Project: Apache Arrow
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: C++, Python
Reporter: Joris Van den Bossche
With ARROW-14500 and ARROW-15545 (https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/14106), we are allowing to cast "storage_type" -> "extension<storage_type>" (and the cast the other way around already worked as well).
Initially, that PR allowed any cast from "any" -> "extension<storage_type>", as long as the input type could be cast to the storage type (so deferring to the "any" -> "storage_type" cast). However, because whether a certain cast makes sense or not depends on the semantics of the extension type, it was restricted to exactly matching storage_type.
One idea could be to still allow the other casts behind a cast option flag, like {{allow_non_storage_extension_casts}} (or a better name), so the user can explicitly allow to cast to/from any type (as long as the cast from/to the storage type works).
That could help for the user, but for certain casts, the ExtensionType might also want to control _how_ such a cast is done. For example, for casting to/from string type (which would be useful for reading/writing CSV files, or for repr), you typically will want to do something different than casting your storage array to string.
A more general solution could thus be to have a mechanism for the ExtensionType to implement a certain cast kernel itself, and register this to the C++ cast dispatching.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)