You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@mesos.apache.org by "Stephan Erb (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/09/09 11:50:20 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-6145) Isolator namespaces/pid is leaking mounts

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15476879#comment-15476879 ] 

Stephan Erb commented on MESOS-6145:
------------------------------------

In slack, [~jieyu] wrote: "As far as I know, no one is using pid namespace isolator in prod. There are some known issues with it (e.g., mount leak). I suggest not using it until we do a full pass over that again and fix all the known issues" https://mesos.slack.com/archives/containerizer/p1472601189000002 

> Isolator namespaces/pid is leaking mounts
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-6145
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6145
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: containerization, isolation, security
>            Reporter: Stephan Erb
>
> As the operator of a Mesos cluster, I would like every container/executor to run in a single PID namespace, so that one task cannot see what else is running on the same host.
> The existing {{namespaces/pid}} isolator seems to provide this feature. However, it seems like it is leaking files. I have exactly one task running currently, but there are still left overs from earlier invocations
> {code}
> vagrant@aurora:~/aurora$ ls -l /var/run/mesos/pidns/
> total 0
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Aug 26 20:30 32b6e4c7-3d22-47ed-a350-9eb929daa241
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Aug 26 20:30 7b812f00-4614-4016-a76c-ff78a175a1b0
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Aug 26 20:24 d501829e-7cf8-40fb-a895-0ad3416da7dc
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Aug 26 20:24 d56ca91f-eb72-426c-8bbb-f3239358a4ef
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Aug 26 20:35 fef9a109-de52-45f3-ae41-171de6495705
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)