JMS 2.0 alignment

[guerra <jg...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

I was just wondering about the JMS 2.0 alignment. Is there any news about
the JMS 2.0 support?

Thank you



--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-2-0-alignment-tp4668129.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: JMS 2.0 alignment

[IBeaumont21 <ia...@aptean.com>]

I had the same question.  No plans?

I've also had a quick look at the Apache Apollo site, and see little mention
of JMS on there.




--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-2-0-alignment-tp4668129p4668563.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: JMS 2.0 alignment

[AE <ad...@middleware360.com>]

What about the server side components, for example the ability to have
multiple durable consumers with same client id for topics?   This is a
really nice feature.



--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-2-0-alignment-tp4668129p4668601.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: JMS 2.0 alignment

[Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com>]

It is on the radar but there are no concrete plans.
one thought is that JMS2 could provide a general interface to all of
the transports that ActiveMq provides. So the jms2 client could have
plugins for amqp, openwire, mqtt, stomp etc.
in other words it could become a unifying force.

If there are particular bits that are of interest, feel free to
contribute a first stab and attach it to a jira. We love contributions
:-)

On 12 June 2013 19:41, guerra <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just wondering about the JMS 2.0 alignment. Is there any news about
> the JMS 2.0 support?
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-2-0-alignment-tp4668129.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-- 
http://redhat.com
http://blog.garytully.com