You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/07/12 02:46:05 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20946] -
Can't specify filter order when combining AddOutputFilter and SetOutputFilter
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20946>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20946
Can't specify filter order when combining AddOutputFilter and SetOutputFilter
------- Additional Comments From trawick@apache.org 2003-07-12 00:46 -------
if you use ftype argument to ExtFilterDefine, you can override the default
placement of your external filter. Normally it is defined as a resource filter,
just like mod_include's filter. If you define it as something that comes after
resource, then mod_include will necessarily come before it.
Try this modified directive:
ExtFilterDefine htmlparser mode=output cmd=/bin/cat intype=text/html ftype=11
11 is 1 more than AP_FTYPE_RESOURCE, so the htmlparser filter would have to come
after any resource filters such as the INCLUDES filter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org