micro-g vs. geronimo framework

[Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com>]

I saw several times the term micro-g as well as geronimo framework (or just framework) used indifferently as synonymous.

I'm trying to standardize the term in the docs and would help a lot if we agree to call it the same way. 

If no one oppose I'll propose we stick to "Geronimo framework" as it also matches the assembly name.

Cheers!
Hernan

Re: micro-g vs. geronimo framework

[Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>]

I'd say call it minimal and just leave "little-g" as a nickname, since  
I think folks like to call it little-g, but technically it is minimal,  
or lite really :-P

--jason


On Mar 6, 2008, at 5:27 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:

> Agreed, the only thing is that we've been calling it Little-G for  
> quite some time now. Would it be too bad to call the assembly that  
> way?
>
> Lets face it,  Little-G sounds a lot cooler that geronimo-minimal.  
> Another thing in favor of keeping Little-G name is that "minimal"  
> would not be as representative anymore since the Geronimo framework  
> would actually the "new" minimal.
>
> Cheers!
> Hernan
>
> Joe Bohn wrote:
>> Hernan Cunico wrote:
>>> I saw several times the term micro-g as well as geronimo framework  
>>> (or just framework) used indifferently as synonymous.
>>>
>>> I'm trying to standardize the term in the docs and would help a  
>>> lot if we agree to call it the same way.
>>> If no one oppose I'll propose we stick to "Geronimo framework" as  
>>> it also matches the assembly name.
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>> Hernan
>>>
>> If we're going to do that (I think it's probably a good idea) ...  
>> then should we also consider using the term "minimal" consistently  
>> instead of little-G?
>> Joe

Re: micro-g vs. geronimo framework

[Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com>]

Agreed, the only thing is that we've been calling it Little-G for quite some time now. Would it be too bad to call the assembly that way?

Lets face it,  Little-G sounds a lot cooler that geronimo-minimal. Another thing in favor of keeping Little-G name is that "minimal" would not be as representative anymore since the Geronimo framework would actually the "new" minimal.

Cheers!
Hernan

Joe Bohn wrote:
> Hernan Cunico wrote:
>> I saw several times the term micro-g as well as geronimo framework (or 
>> just framework) used indifferently as synonymous.
>>
>> I'm trying to standardize the term in the docs and would help a lot if 
>> we agree to call it the same way.
>> If no one oppose I'll propose we stick to "Geronimo framework" as it 
>> also matches the assembly name.
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Hernan
>>
> 
> If we're going to do that (I think it's probably a good idea) ... then 
> should we also consider using the term "minimal" consistently instead of 
> little-G?
> 
> Joe
> 
> 

Re: micro-g vs. geronimo framework

[Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>]

Hernan Cunico wrote:
> I saw several times the term micro-g as well as geronimo framework (or 
> just framework) used indifferently as synonymous.
> 
> I'm trying to standardize the term in the docs and would help a lot if 
> we agree to call it the same way.
> If no one oppose I'll propose we stick to "Geronimo framework" as it 
> also matches the assembly name.
> 
> Cheers!
> Hernan
> 

If we're going to do that (I think it's probably a good idea) ... then 
should we also consider using the term "minimal" consistently instead of 
little-G?

Joe