You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Kane Kane <ka...@gmail.com> on 2014/10/02 20:28:32 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] 0.8.1.2 Release
Having the same question: what happened to 0.8.2 release, when it's
supposed to happen?
Thanks.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Jonathan Weeks
<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was one asking for 0.8.1.2 a few weeks back, when 0.8.2 was at least 6-8 weeks out.
>
> If we truly believe that 0.8.2 will go “golden” and stable in 2-3 weeks, I, for one, don’t need a 0.8.1.2, but it depends on the confidence in shipping 0.8.2 soonish.
>
> YMMV,
>
> -Jonathan
>
>
> On Sep 30, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Neha Narkhede <ne...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Can we discuss the need for 0.8.1.2? I'm wondering if it's related to the
>> timeline of 0.8.2 in any way? For instance, if we can get 0.8.2 out in the
>> next 2-3 weeks, do we still need to get 0.8.1.2 out or can people just
>> upgrade to 0.8.2?
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Joe Stein <jo...@stealth.ly> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I wanted to kick off a specific discussion on a 0.8.1.2 release.
>>>
>>> Here are the JIRAs I would like to propose to back port a patch (if not
>>> already done so) and apply them to the 0.8.1 branch for a 0.8.1.2 release
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1502 (source jar is empty)
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1419 (cross build for scala
>>> 2.11)
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1382 (Update zkVersion on
>>> partition state update failures)
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1490 (remove gradlew initial
>>> setup output from source distribution)
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1645 (some more jars in our
>>> src
>>> release)
>>>
>>> If the community and committers can comment on the patches proposed that
>>> would be great. If I missed any bring them up or if you think any I have
>>> proposed shouldn't be int he release bring that up too please.
>>>
>>> Once we have consensus on this thread my thought was that I would apply and
>>> commit the agreed to tickets to the 0.8.1 branch. If any tickets don't
>>> apply of course a back port patch has to happen through our standard
>>> process (not worried about that we have some engineering cycles to
>>> contribute to making that happen). Once that is all done, I will build
>>> 0.8.1.2 release artifacts and call a VOTE for RC1.
>>>
>>> /*******************************************
>>> Joe Stein
>>> Founder, Principal Consultant
>>> Big Data Open Source Security LLC
>>> http://www.stealth.ly
>>> Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
>>> ********************************************/
>>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] 0.8.1.2 Release
Posted by Jun Rao <ju...@gmail.com>.
Balaji,
Thanks for your interest. Do you think you could help on KAFKA-1493?
Jun
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Seshadri, Balaji <Ba...@dish.com>
wrote:
> I would be glad to help in any of these blockers,please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Balaji
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jun Rao [mailto:junrao@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 3:48 PM
> To: users@kafka.apache.org
> Cc: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 0.8.1.2 Release
>
> We already cut an 0.8.2 release branch. The plan is to have the remaining
> blockers resolved before releasing it. Hopefully this will just take a
> couple of weeks.
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1663?filter=-4&jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.2%20ORDER%20BY%20createdDate%20DESC
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Kane Kane <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Having the same question: what happened to 0.8.2 release, when it's
> > supposed to happen?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Jonathan Weeks
> > <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I was one asking for 0.8.1.2 a few weeks back, when 0.8.2 was at
> > > least
> > 6-8 weeks out.
> > >
> > > If we truly believe that 0.8.2 will go “golden” and stable in 2-3
> > > weeks,
> > I, for one, don’t need a 0.8.1.2, but it depends on the confidence in
> > shipping 0.8.2 soonish.
> > >
> > > YMMV,
> > >
> > > -Jonathan
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sep 30, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Neha Narkhede
> > > <ne...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Can we discuss the need for 0.8.1.2? I'm wondering if it's related
> > >> to
> > the
> > >> timeline of 0.8.2 in any way? For instance, if we can get 0.8.2 out
> > >> in
> > the
> > >> next 2-3 weeks, do we still need to get 0.8.1.2 out or can people
> > >> just upgrade to 0.8.2?
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Joe Stein <jo...@stealth.ly>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi, I wanted to kick off a specific discussion on a 0.8.1.2 release.
> > >>>
> > >>> Here are the JIRAs I would like to propose to back port a patch
> > >>> (if not already done so) and apply them to the 0.8.1 branch for a
> > >>> 0.8.1.2
> > release
> > >>>
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1502 (source jar is
> > >>> empty)
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1419 (cross build for
> > scala
> > >>> 2.11)
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1382 (Update zkVersion
> > >>> on partition state update failures)
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1490 (remove gradlew
> > initial
> > >>> setup output from source distribution)
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1645 (some more jars
> > >>> in
> > our
> > >>> src
> > >>> release)
> > >>>
> > >>> If the community and committers can comment on the patches
> > >>> proposed
> > that
> > >>> would be great. If I missed any bring them up or if you think any
> > >>> I
> > have
> > >>> proposed shouldn't be int he release bring that up too please.
> > >>>
> > >>> Once we have consensus on this thread my thought was that I would
> > apply and
> > >>> commit the agreed to tickets to the 0.8.1 branch. If any tickets
> > >>> don't apply of course a back port patch has to happen through our
> > >>> standard process (not worried about that we have some engineering
> > >>> cycles to contribute to making that happen). Once that is all
> > >>> done, I will build
> > >>> 0.8.1.2 release artifacts and call a VOTE for RC1.
> > >>>
> > >>> /*******************************************
> > >>> Joe Stein
> > >>> Founder, Principal Consultant
> > >>> Big Data Open Source Security LLC
> > >>> http://www.stealth.ly
> > >>> Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
> > >>> ********************************************/
> > >>>
> > >
> >
>
RE: [DISCUSS] 0.8.1.2 Release
Posted by "Seshadri, Balaji" <Ba...@dish.com>.
I would be glad to help in any of these blockers,please let me know.
Thanks,
Balaji
-----Original Message-----
From: Jun Rao [mailto:junrao@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 3:48 PM
To: users@kafka.apache.org
Cc: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 0.8.1.2 Release
We already cut an 0.8.2 release branch. The plan is to have the remaining blockers resolved before releasing it. Hopefully this will just take a couple of weeks.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1663?filter=-4&jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.2%20ORDER%20BY%20createdDate%20DESC
Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Kane Kane <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Having the same question: what happened to 0.8.2 release, when it's
> supposed to happen?
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Jonathan Weeks
> <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I was one asking for 0.8.1.2 a few weeks back, when 0.8.2 was at
> > least
> 6-8 weeks out.
> >
> > If we truly believe that 0.8.2 will go “golden” and stable in 2-3
> > weeks,
> I, for one, don’t need a 0.8.1.2, but it depends on the confidence in
> shipping 0.8.2 soonish.
> >
> > YMMV,
> >
> > -Jonathan
> >
> >
> > On Sep 30, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Neha Narkhede
> > <ne...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Can we discuss the need for 0.8.1.2? I'm wondering if it's related
> >> to
> the
> >> timeline of 0.8.2 in any way? For instance, if we can get 0.8.2 out
> >> in
> the
> >> next 2-3 weeks, do we still need to get 0.8.1.2 out or can people
> >> just upgrade to 0.8.2?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Joe Stein <jo...@stealth.ly>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi, I wanted to kick off a specific discussion on a 0.8.1.2 release.
> >>>
> >>> Here are the JIRAs I would like to propose to back port a patch
> >>> (if not already done so) and apply them to the 0.8.1 branch for a
> >>> 0.8.1.2
> release
> >>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1502 (source jar is
> >>> empty)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1419 (cross build for
> scala
> >>> 2.11)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1382 (Update zkVersion
> >>> on partition state update failures)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1490 (remove gradlew
> initial
> >>> setup output from source distribution)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1645 (some more jars
> >>> in
> our
> >>> src
> >>> release)
> >>>
> >>> If the community and committers can comment on the patches
> >>> proposed
> that
> >>> would be great. If I missed any bring them up or if you think any
> >>> I
> have
> >>> proposed shouldn't be int he release bring that up too please.
> >>>
> >>> Once we have consensus on this thread my thought was that I would
> apply and
> >>> commit the agreed to tickets to the 0.8.1 branch. If any tickets
> >>> don't apply of course a back port patch has to happen through our
> >>> standard process (not worried about that we have some engineering
> >>> cycles to contribute to making that happen). Once that is all
> >>> done, I will build
> >>> 0.8.1.2 release artifacts and call a VOTE for RC1.
> >>>
> >>> /*******************************************
> >>> Joe Stein
> >>> Founder, Principal Consultant
> >>> Big Data Open Source Security LLC
> >>> http://www.stealth.ly
> >>> Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
> >>> ********************************************/
> >>>
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] 0.8.1.2 Release
Posted by Jun Rao <ju...@gmail.com>.
We already cut an 0.8.2 release branch. The plan is to have the remaining
blockers resolved before releasing it. Hopefully this will just take a
couple of weeks.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1663?filter=-4&jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.2%20ORDER%20BY%20createdDate%20DESC
Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Kane Kane <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Having the same question: what happened to 0.8.2 release, when it's
> supposed to happen?
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Jonathan Weeks
> <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I was one asking for 0.8.1.2 a few weeks back, when 0.8.2 was at least
> 6-8 weeks out.
> >
> > If we truly believe that 0.8.2 will go “golden” and stable in 2-3 weeks,
> I, for one, don’t need a 0.8.1.2, but it depends on the confidence in
> shipping 0.8.2 soonish.
> >
> > YMMV,
> >
> > -Jonathan
> >
> >
> > On Sep 30, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Neha Narkhede <ne...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Can we discuss the need for 0.8.1.2? I'm wondering if it's related to
> the
> >> timeline of 0.8.2 in any way? For instance, if we can get 0.8.2 out in
> the
> >> next 2-3 weeks, do we still need to get 0.8.1.2 out or can people just
> >> upgrade to 0.8.2?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Joe Stein <jo...@stealth.ly>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi, I wanted to kick off a specific discussion on a 0.8.1.2 release.
> >>>
> >>> Here are the JIRAs I would like to propose to back port a patch (if not
> >>> already done so) and apply them to the 0.8.1 branch for a 0.8.1.2
> release
> >>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1502 (source jar is empty)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1419 (cross build for
> scala
> >>> 2.11)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1382 (Update zkVersion on
> >>> partition state update failures)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1490 (remove gradlew
> initial
> >>> setup output from source distribution)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1645 (some more jars in
> our
> >>> src
> >>> release)
> >>>
> >>> If the community and committers can comment on the patches proposed
> that
> >>> would be great. If I missed any bring them up or if you think any I
> have
> >>> proposed shouldn't be int he release bring that up too please.
> >>>
> >>> Once we have consensus on this thread my thought was that I would
> apply and
> >>> commit the agreed to tickets to the 0.8.1 branch. If any tickets don't
> >>> apply of course a back port patch has to happen through our standard
> >>> process (not worried about that we have some engineering cycles to
> >>> contribute to making that happen). Once that is all done, I will build
> >>> 0.8.1.2 release artifacts and call a VOTE for RC1.
> >>>
> >>> /*******************************************
> >>> Joe Stein
> >>> Founder, Principal Consultant
> >>> Big Data Open Source Security LLC
> >>> http://www.stealth.ly
> >>> Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
> >>> ********************************************/
> >>>
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] 0.8.1.2 Release
Posted by Jun Rao <ju...@gmail.com>.
We already cut an 0.8.2 release branch. The plan is to have the remaining
blockers resolved before releasing it. Hopefully this will just take a
couple of weeks.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1663?filter=-4&jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.2%20ORDER%20BY%20createdDate%20DESC
Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Kane Kane <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Having the same question: what happened to 0.8.2 release, when it's
> supposed to happen?
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Jonathan Weeks
> <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I was one asking for 0.8.1.2 a few weeks back, when 0.8.2 was at least
> 6-8 weeks out.
> >
> > If we truly believe that 0.8.2 will go “golden” and stable in 2-3 weeks,
> I, for one, don’t need a 0.8.1.2, but it depends on the confidence in
> shipping 0.8.2 soonish.
> >
> > YMMV,
> >
> > -Jonathan
> >
> >
> > On Sep 30, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Neha Narkhede <ne...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Can we discuss the need for 0.8.1.2? I'm wondering if it's related to
> the
> >> timeline of 0.8.2 in any way? For instance, if we can get 0.8.2 out in
> the
> >> next 2-3 weeks, do we still need to get 0.8.1.2 out or can people just
> >> upgrade to 0.8.2?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Joe Stein <jo...@stealth.ly>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi, I wanted to kick off a specific discussion on a 0.8.1.2 release.
> >>>
> >>> Here are the JIRAs I would like to propose to back port a patch (if not
> >>> already done so) and apply them to the 0.8.1 branch for a 0.8.1.2
> release
> >>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1502 (source jar is empty)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1419 (cross build for
> scala
> >>> 2.11)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1382 (Update zkVersion on
> >>> partition state update failures)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1490 (remove gradlew
> initial
> >>> setup output from source distribution)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1645 (some more jars in
> our
> >>> src
> >>> release)
> >>>
> >>> If the community and committers can comment on the patches proposed
> that
> >>> would be great. If I missed any bring them up or if you think any I
> have
> >>> proposed shouldn't be int he release bring that up too please.
> >>>
> >>> Once we have consensus on this thread my thought was that I would
> apply and
> >>> commit the agreed to tickets to the 0.8.1 branch. If any tickets don't
> >>> apply of course a back port patch has to happen through our standard
> >>> process (not worried about that we have some engineering cycles to
> >>> contribute to making that happen). Once that is all done, I will build
> >>> 0.8.1.2 release artifacts and call a VOTE for RC1.
> >>>
> >>> /*******************************************
> >>> Joe Stein
> >>> Founder, Principal Consultant
> >>> Big Data Open Source Security LLC
> >>> http://www.stealth.ly
> >>> Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
> >>> ********************************************/
> >>>
> >
>