You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Michael Monnerie <mi...@it-management.at> on 2007/08/14 09:01:58 UTC
Why was this SPF rejected?
Dear list, I got this message and do not understand why it happened.
protegate5.zmi.at (212.69.162.205) is our mailgate, but when I click on
that openspf.org link now, it writes that the e-mail should have
passed. Has the SPF record been changed, or is there some other
problem? We have over 100 domains on this mailgate, and I never got a
report about problems. Any ideas?
On Dienstag, 14. August 2007 dev-help@spamassassin.apache.org wrote:
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
> addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't
> work out.
>
> <mi...@it-management.at>:
> 212.69.162.205 does not like recipient.
> Remote host said: 554 5.7.1 <mi...@it-management.at>:
> Recipient address rejected: Please see
>
http://www.openspf.org/why.html?sender=dev-return-32597-michael.monnerie%3Dit-management.at%40spamassassin.apache.org&ip=140.211.11.2&receiver=protegate5.zmi.at
> Giving up on 212.69.162.205.
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0676/846 914 666 .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: EA39 8918 EDFF 0A68 ACFB 11B7 BA2D 060F 1C6F E6B0
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 1C6FE6B0
Re: Why was this SPF rejected?
Posted by Michael Parker <pa...@pobox.com>.
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> Dear list, I got this message and do not understand why it happened.
> protegate5.zmi.at (212.69.162.205) is our mailgate, but when I click on
> that openspf.org link now, it writes that the e-mail should have
> passed. Has the SPF record been changed, or is there some other
> problem? We have over 100 domains on this mailgate, and I never got a
> report about problems. Any ideas?
The infra guys switch out mail servers the other day. When they did
they forgot to update some SPF records for a day or so. I believe it
has all been fixed up now.
Michael
>
> On Dienstag, 14. August 2007 dev-help@spamassassin.apache.org wrote:
>> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org.
>> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
>> addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't
>> work out.
>>
>> <mi...@it-management.at>:
>> 212.69.162.205 does not like recipient.
>> Remote host said: 554 5.7.1 <mi...@it-management.at>:
>> Recipient address rejected: Please see
>>
> http://www.openspf.org/why.html?sender=dev-return-32597-michael.monnerie%3Dit-management.at%40spamassassin.apache.org&ip=140.211.11.2&receiver=protegate5.zmi.at
>> Giving up on 212.69.162.205.
>
> mfg zmi