You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by David Gibbs <da...@midrange.com> on 2008/03/05 20:54:36 UTC

Re: Errors all of a sudden?

Any thoughts on this?

David Gibbs wrote:
> I was watching my maillog this morning, trying to spot something else 
> that wasn't quite working right when I noticed a bunch of errors similar 
> to the following:
> 
> Feb 19 11:09:26 rivendell spamd[987]: Subroutine 
> DEAR_SOMETHING_one_line_body_te
> st redefined at 
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/updates_spamassassin_org/20_phras
> es.cf, rule DEAR_SOMETHING, line 4, <GEN839> line 128.
> Feb 19 11:09:26 rivendell spamd[987]: Subroutine 
> __DRUGS_ERECTILE_L_one_line_bod
> y_test redefined at 
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/updates_spamassassin_org/20_d
> rugs.cf, rule __DRUGS_ERECTILE_L, line 6, <GEN839> line 128.
> Feb 19 11:09:26 rivendell spamd[987]: Subroutine 
> __CARD_DIRECT_WWW_ADDRESS_one_l
> ine_body_test redefined at 
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/updates_spamassassin_o
> rg/80_additional.cf, rule __CARD_DIRECT_WWW_ADDRESS, line 6, <GEN839> 
> line 128.
> Feb 19 11:09:26 rivendell spamd[987]: Subroutine 
> FB_HOMELOAN_one_line_body_test
> redefined at 
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.c
> f, rule FB_HOMELOAN, line 6, <GEN839> line 128.
> 
>  From what I can see in the logs, they started on 19-Feb.
> 
> I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.2.4 running on Perl version 5.8.8 in 
> stock Fedora 8.
> 
> I run the following command every 6 hours to update spamassassin: 
> /usr/bin/sa-update && /usr/bin/sa-compile > /dev/null 2>/tmp/sa-com
> pile.log && kill -HUP $(cat /var/run/spamd.pid)
> 
> When I run spamassassin --lint, no errors are reported.  If it's useful, 
> the output of spamassassin --lint -D is available at 
> http://www.qtemp.net/spamassassin-lint.txt.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> david
> 


Re: Errors all of a sudden?

Posted by "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <sp...@dostech.ca>.
On 05/03/2008 2:54 PM, David Gibbs wrote:
> Any thoughts on this?

grep /etc/mail/spamassassin/*.cf and
/usr/local/home/david/.spamassassin/user_prefs for "DEAR_SOMETHING".

Check to make sure that spamd isn't being started with any options that
modify where it looks for rules.

Try it without the rules being compiled (rm -rf
/var/lib/spamassassin/compiled/).

Daryl


> David Gibbs wrote:
>> I was watching my maillog this morning, trying to spot something else
>> that wasn't quite working right when I noticed a bunch of errors
>> similar to the following:
>>
>> Feb 19 11:09:26 rivendell spamd[987]: Subroutine
>> DEAR_SOMETHING_one_line_body_te
>> st redefined at
>> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/updates_spamassassin_org/20_phras
>> es.cf, rule DEAR_SOMETHING, line 4, <GEN839> line 128.
>> Feb 19 11:09:26 rivendell spamd[987]: Subroutine
>> __DRUGS_ERECTILE_L_one_line_bod
>> y_test redefined at
>> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/updates_spamassassin_org/20_d
>> rugs.cf, rule __DRUGS_ERECTILE_L, line 6, <GEN839> line 128.
>> Feb 19 11:09:26 rivendell spamd[987]: Subroutine
>> __CARD_DIRECT_WWW_ADDRESS_one_l
>> ine_body_test redefined at
>> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/updates_spamassassin_o
>> rg/80_additional.cf, rule __CARD_DIRECT_WWW_ADDRESS, line 6, <GEN839>
>> line 128.
>> Feb 19 11:09:26 rivendell spamd[987]: Subroutine
>> FB_HOMELOAN_one_line_body_test
>> redefined at
>> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.c
>> f, rule FB_HOMELOAN, line 6, <GEN839> line 128.
>>
>>  From what I can see in the logs, they started on 19-Feb.
>>
>> I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.2.4 running on Perl version 5.8.8
>> in stock Fedora 8.
>>
>> I run the following command every 6 hours to update spamassassin:
>> /usr/bin/sa-update && /usr/bin/sa-compile > /dev/null 2>/tmp/sa-com
>> pile.log && kill -HUP $(cat /var/run/spamd.pid)
>>
>> When I run spamassassin --lint, no errors are reported.  If it's
>> useful, the output of spamassassin --lint -D is available at
>> http://www.qtemp.net/spamassassin-lint.txt.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> david
>>
>