You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@nuttx.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/04/12 23:46:43 UTC

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] hartmannathan commented on a change in pull request #745: [DO NOT MERGE] arch/stm32h7: Explicit support for all STM32H7x3xx

hartmannathan commented on a change in pull request #745: [DO NOT MERGE] arch/stm32h7: Explicit support for all STM32H7x3xx
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/745#discussion_r407267427
 
 

 ##########
 File path: arch/arm/include/stm32h7/chip.h
 ##########
 @@ -53,16 +53,40 @@
  *
  *   PART        PACKAGE
  *   ----------- ----------------
+ *   STM32H7x3Ax UFBGA169
 
 Review comment:
   @davids5 How would you define STM32H7_NGPIO if there are gaps in the ports? For example, if ports A, B, C, D, E, H are exposed to pins, and ports F and G are not exposed to pins, is STM32H7_NGPIO supposed to be defined to 6 or 8?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services