You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by GOMEZ Henri <hg...@slib.fr> on 2001/11/06 17:38:26 UTC
RE: Benchmarking Tomcat 4.0 + Apache 1.3.XX + webapp against Tomc
at 4 .0
I've got some benchs :
TC 3.3 stand-alone
TC 3.3 + mod_jk / ajp13
TC 4.0 stand-alone
TC 4.0 + mod_jk / ajp13
TC 4.0 + mod_webapp
It's attached :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]____
EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr (. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Parashar, Hitesh [mailto:Hitesh.Parashar@Avnet.com]
>Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:37 PM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: Benchmarking Tomcat 4.0 + Apache 1.3.XX + webapp
>against Tomcat
>4 .0
>
>
>Hi Cats and Toms:
>
>How does trio of "Tomcat 4 + Apache 1.3.xx + webapp module"
>perform compared
>to the lonely Tomcat 4.0 for static content? Has anyone done any
>benchmarking on this?
>
>If the performance degraded is not very substantial then we
>would like to go
>without the PINTA(ss) Apache/webapp/Tomcat. Another thing by
>using Tomcat
>4.0 alone that we will get is JBoss embedded Tomcat service
>which will not
>require any modifications for webapp in server.xml.
>
>Any "hard-evidence" for Tomcat 4.0 being equally fast as
>Apache+Tomcat for
>static content post-4.0?
>
>TIA,
>
>Hitesh.
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
Re: Benchmarking Tomcat 4.0 + Apache 1.3.XX + webapp against Tomcat 4 .0
Posted by David Cassidy <dc...@hotgen.com>.
How about apache 2 and tomcat 3.2.3 ?
Thats the one I'd like to know ...
David
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
>
> I've got some benchs :
>
> TC 3.3 stand-alone
> TC 3.3 + mod_jk / ajp13
> TC 4.0 stand-alone
> TC 4.0 + mod_jk / ajp13
> TC 4.0 + mod_webapp
>
> It's attached :)
>
> -
> Henri Gomez ___[_]____
> EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr (. .)
> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Parashar, Hitesh [mailto:Hitesh.Parashar@Avnet.com]
> >Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:37 PM
> >To: Tomcat Users List
> >Subject: Benchmarking Tomcat 4.0 + Apache 1.3.XX + webapp
> >against Tomcat
> >4 .0
> >
> >
> >Hi Cats and Toms:
> >
> >How does trio of "Tomcat 4 + Apache 1.3.xx + webapp module"
> >perform compared
> >to the lonely Tomcat 4.0 for static content? Has anyone done any
> >benchmarking on this?
> >
> >If the performance degraded is not very substantial then we
> >would like to go
> >without the PINTA(ss) Apache/webapp/Tomcat. Another thing by
> >using Tomcat
> >4.0 alone that we will get is JBoss embedded Tomcat service
> >which will not
> >require any modifications for webapp in server.xml.
> >
> >Any "hard-evidence" for Tomcat 4.0 being equally fast as
> >Apache+Tomcat for
> >static content post-4.0?
> >
> >TIA,
> >
> >Hitesh.
> >
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
> >For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
> >Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
> >
>
>
--
To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Benchmarking Tomcat 4.0 + Apache 1.3.XX + webapp against Tomc
at 4 .0
Posted by Pier Fumagalli <pi...@betaversion.org>.
GOMEZ Henri at hgomez@slib.fr wrote:
> I've got some benchs :
>
> TC 3.3 stand-alone
> TC 3.3 + mod_jk / ajp13
> TC 4.0 stand-alone
> TC 4.0 + mod_jk / ajp13
> TC 4.0 + mod_webapp
>
> It's attached :)
Damn, am I loosing only 40/50 requests per second over 50 of concurrency
against AJPv13? And thinking that I don't even have one line of optimization
in WebApp...
Soooo Cooool.... :)
Pier
--
To unsubscribe: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Troubles with the list: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>