You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@phoenix.apache.org by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> on 2015/11/17 19:56:24 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] discontinue 4-x HBase 1.0 releases?
FYI, HBase has recently decided to discontinue the 1.0.x line. I believe
the pending 1.0.3 release is expected to be the last.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:36 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Thanks for letting us know, Anirudha & James. Makes sense to keep the 1.0
> branch going in light of this hard dependency you have.
>
> James
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Anirudha Khanna <
> akhanna@marinsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>> Same for us, we are also using CDH5 and it would be a big setback if
>> HBase-1.0 support is stopped by the community.
>>
>> Anirudha
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:01 PM, James Heather <
>> james.heather@mendeley.com> wrote:
>>
>>> We're using CDH5, which runs HBase 1.0.
>>>
>>> I think it would kill the whole Phoenix project for us if there were no
>>> 1.0 support.
>>>
>>> James
>>>
>>>
>>> On 19/09/15 01:53, James Taylor wrote:
>>>
>>> +user list
>>>
>>> Please let us know if you're counting on HBase 1.0 support given that we
>>> have HBase 1.1 support.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> James
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Seems like a better question for the users mailing list. Probably it
>>>> depends on where the vendors are going, if there will be a long-running
>>>> 1.0.x release line, we should keep it around. From Apache perspective,
>>>> it's
>>>> probably fine to drop 1.0.x in favor of 1.1.x. HBase 1.2 is right around
>>>> the corner too...
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor <
>>>> <ja...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Given that we have Phoenix support for HBase 1.1, does anyone feel
>>>> like we
>>>> > need to continue with Phoenix releases for HBase 1.0?
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > James
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] discontinue 4-x HBase 1.0 releases?
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Shouldn't be a big challenge, the friction for porting back patches from a
1.1 based tree to a 1.0 based tree will be low. The exception will be
anything touching Region/HRegion but those differences can be mostly
handled with simple substitution.
For CDH users, note there's also
https://github.com/chiastic-security/phoenix-for-cloudera, which has
branches for the last two releases, should be informally maintained by the
Phoenix community for a while, and lets you build Phoenix release binary
compatible with CDH's version of HBase.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:31 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Until the CDH distro moves off of 1.0, we'll likely want to continue
> releasing Phoenix on top of it (even if there are no further HBase 1.0
> releases). That's assuming our CDH Phoenix users want the new features and
> bug fixes we're developing.
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> That's my understanding as well.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> FYI, HBase has recently decided to discontinue the 1.0.x line. I believe
>>> the pending 1.0.3 release is expected to be the last.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:36 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for letting us know, Anirudha & James. Makes sense to keep the
>>>> 1.0 branch going in light of this hard dependency you have.
>>>>
>>>> James
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Anirudha Khanna <
>>>> akhanna@marinsoftware.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Same for us, we are also using CDH5 and it would be a big setback if
>>>>> HBase-1.0 support is stopped by the community.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anirudha
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:01 PM, James Heather <
>>>>> james.heather@mendeley.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We're using CDH5, which runs HBase 1.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it would kill the whole Phoenix project for us if there were
>>>>>> no 1.0 support.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> James
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 19/09/15 01:53, James Taylor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +user list
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please let us know if you're counting on HBase 1.0 support given that
>>>>>> we have HBase 1.1 support.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> James
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seems like a better question for the users mailing list. Probably it
>>>>>>> depends on where the vendors are going, if there will be a
>>>>>>> long-running
>>>>>>> 1.0.x release line, we should keep it around. From Apache
>>>>>>> perspective, it's
>>>>>>> probably fine to drop 1.0.x in favor of 1.1.x. HBase 1.2 is right
>>>>>>> around
>>>>>>> the corner too...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor <
>>>>>>> <ja...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > Given that we have Phoenix support for HBase 1.1, does anyone feel
>>>>>>> like we
>>>>>>> > need to continue with Phoenix releases for HBase 1.0?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>>> > James
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
>
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: [DISCUSS] discontinue 4-x HBase 1.0 releases?
Posted by Stephen Wilcoxon <wi...@gmail.com>.
Agreed. Until Cloudera moves CDH off Hbase 1.0, Phoenix should continue to
support it.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:31 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Until the CDH distro moves off of 1.0, we'll likely want to continue
> releasing Phoenix on top of it (even if there are no further HBase 1.0
> releases). That's assuming our CDH Phoenix users want the new features and
> bug fixes we're developing.
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> That's my understanding as well.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> FYI, HBase has recently decided to discontinue the 1.0.x line. I believe
>>> the pending 1.0.3 release is expected to be the last.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:36 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for letting us know, Anirudha & James. Makes sense to keep the
>>>> 1.0 branch going in light of this hard dependency you have.
>>>>
>>>> James
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Anirudha Khanna <
>>>> akhanna@marinsoftware.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Same for us, we are also using CDH5 and it would be a big setback if
>>>>> HBase-1.0 support is stopped by the community.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anirudha
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:01 PM, James Heather <
>>>>> james.heather@mendeley.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We're using CDH5, which runs HBase 1.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it would kill the whole Phoenix project for us if there were
>>>>>> no 1.0 support.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> James
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 19/09/15 01:53, James Taylor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +user list
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please let us know if you're counting on HBase 1.0 support given that
>>>>>> we have HBase 1.1 support.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> James
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seems like a better question for the users mailing list. Probably it
>>>>>>> depends on where the vendors are going, if there will be a
>>>>>>> long-running
>>>>>>> 1.0.x release line, we should keep it around. From Apache
>>>>>>> perspective, it's
>>>>>>> probably fine to drop 1.0.x in favor of 1.1.x. HBase 1.2 is right
>>>>>>> around
>>>>>>> the corner too...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor <
>>>>>>> <ja...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > Given that we have Phoenix support for HBase 1.1, does anyone feel
>>>>>>> like we
>>>>>>> > need to continue with Phoenix releases for HBase 1.0?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>>> > James
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] discontinue 4-x HBase 1.0 releases?
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
Until the CDH distro moves off of 1.0, we'll likely want to continue
releasing Phoenix on top of it (even if there are no further HBase 1.0
releases). That's assuming our CDH Phoenix users want the new features and
bug fixes we're developing.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> That's my understanding as well.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> FYI, HBase has recently decided to discontinue the 1.0.x line. I believe
>> the pending 1.0.3 release is expected to be the last.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:36 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for letting us know, Anirudha & James. Makes sense to keep the
>>> 1.0 branch going in light of this hard dependency you have.
>>>
>>> James
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Anirudha Khanna <
>>> akhanna@marinsoftware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Same for us, we are also using CDH5 and it would be a big setback if
>>>> HBase-1.0 support is stopped by the community.
>>>>
>>>> Anirudha
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:01 PM, James Heather <
>>>> james.heather@mendeley.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We're using CDH5, which runs HBase 1.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it would kill the whole Phoenix project for us if there were
>>>>> no 1.0 support.
>>>>>
>>>>> James
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19/09/15 01:53, James Taylor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +user list
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let us know if you're counting on HBase 1.0 support given that
>>>>> we have HBase 1.1 support.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> James
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Seems like a better question for the users mailing list. Probably it
>>>>>> depends on where the vendors are going, if there will be a
>>>>>> long-running
>>>>>> 1.0.x release line, we should keep it around. From Apache
>>>>>> perspective, it's
>>>>>> probably fine to drop 1.0.x in favor of 1.1.x. HBase 1.2 is right
>>>>>> around
>>>>>> the corner too...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor <
>>>>>> <ja...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Given that we have Phoenix support for HBase 1.1, does anyone feel
>>>>>> like we
>>>>>> > need to continue with Phoenix releases for HBase 1.0?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>> > James
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: [DISCUSS] discontinue 4-x HBase 1.0 releases?
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
That's my understanding as well.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> FYI, HBase has recently decided to discontinue the 1.0.x line. I believe
> the pending 1.0.3 release is expected to be the last.
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:36 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for letting us know, Anirudha & James. Makes sense to keep the 1.0
>> branch going in light of this hard dependency you have.
>>
>> James
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Anirudha Khanna <
>> akhanna@marinsoftware.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Same for us, we are also using CDH5 and it would be a big setback if
>>> HBase-1.0 support is stopped by the community.
>>>
>>> Anirudha
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:01 PM, James Heather <
>>> james.heather@mendeley.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We're using CDH5, which runs HBase 1.0.
>>>>
>>>> I think it would kill the whole Phoenix project for us if there were no
>>>> 1.0 support.
>>>>
>>>> James
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 19/09/15 01:53, James Taylor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +user list
>>>>
>>>> Please let us know if you're counting on HBase 1.0 support given that
>>>> we have HBase 1.1 support.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> James
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Seems like a better question for the users mailing list. Probably it
>>>>> depends on where the vendors are going, if there will be a long-running
>>>>> 1.0.x release line, we should keep it around. From Apache perspective,
>>>>> it's
>>>>> probably fine to drop 1.0.x in favor of 1.1.x. HBase 1.2 is right
>>>>> around
>>>>> the corner too...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor <
>>>>> <ja...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Given that we have Phoenix support for HBase 1.1, does anyone feel
>>>>> like we
>>>>> > need to continue with Phoenix releases for HBase 1.0?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>> > James
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)