You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Bernd Fehling <be...@uni-bielefeld.de> on 2012/06/01 08:28:08 UTC
Re: Multi-words synonyms matching
Are you sure with LUCENE_33 (Use of BitVector)?
Am 31.05.2012 17:20, schrieb O. Klein:
> I have been struggling with this as well and found that using LUCENE_33 gives
> the best results.
>
> But as it will be deprecated this is no everlasting solution. May somebody
> knows one?
>
Re: Multi-words synonyms matching
Posted by Bernd Fehling <be...@uni-bielefeld.de>.
Do you have test cases?
What are you sending to your SynonymFilterFactory?
What are you expecting it should return?
What is it returning when setting to Version.LUCENE_33?
What is it returning when setting to Version.LUCENE_36?
Am 05.06.2012 10:56, schrieb O. Klein:
> The reason multi word synonyms work better if you use LUCENE_33 is because
> then Solr uses the SlowSynonymFilter instead of SynonymFilterFactory
> (FSTSynonymFilterFactory).
>
> But I don't know if the difference between them is a bug or not. Maybe
> someone has more insight?
>
>
>
>
> Bernd Fehling-2 wrote
>>
>> Are you sure with LUCENE_33 (Use of BitVector)?
>>
>>
>> Am 31.05.2012 17:20, schrieb O. Klein:
>>> I have been struggling with this as well and found that using LUCENE_33
>>> gives
>>> the best results.
>>>
>>> But as it will be deprecated this is no everlasting solution. May
>>> somebody
>>> knows one?
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multi-words-synonyms-matching-tp3898950p3987728.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Multi-words synonyms matching
Posted by "O. Klein" <kl...@octoweb.nl>.
The reason multi word synonyms work better if you use LUCENE_33 is because
then Solr uses the SlowSynonymFilter instead of SynonymFilterFactory
(FSTSynonymFilterFactory).
But I don't know if the difference between them is a bug or not. Maybe
someone has more insight?
Bernd Fehling-2 wrote
>
> Are you sure with LUCENE_33 (Use of BitVector)?
>
>
> Am 31.05.2012 17:20, schrieb O. Klein:
>> I have been struggling with this as well and found that using LUCENE_33
>> gives
>> the best results.
>>
>> But as it will be deprecated this is no everlasting solution. May
>> somebody
>> knows one?
>>
>
--
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multi-words-synonyms-matching-tp3898950p3987728.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Multi-words synonyms matching
Posted by "O. Klein" <kl...@octoweb.nl>.
Looking for some more background information I stumbled upon
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3668. If you read the last post
it confirms my issue. So maybe this is a bug?
Bernd Fehling-2 wrote
>
> Are you sure with LUCENE_33 (Use of BitVector)?
>
>
> Am 31.05.2012 17:20, schrieb O. Klein:
>> I have been struggling with this as well and found that using LUCENE_33
>> gives
>> the best results.
>>
>> But as it will be deprecated this is no everlasting solution. May
>> somebody
>> knows one?
>>
>
--
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multi-words-synonyms-matching-tp3898950p3987241.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.