You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@visi.com> on 2006/08/24 03:18:06 UTC
Fwd: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
Do we really want xbean dependent on genesis? Seems like it's not
working out too well.
-David
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Guillaume Nodet" <gn...@gmail.com>
> Date: August 23, 2006 1:44:02 PM PDT
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
> Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>
> I would totally agree with you if maven allows you to release
> something which
> is dependant on a snapshot (even a plugin). Which unfortunately is
> not the case ...
>
> Btw, a non snapshot release of genesis would be nice, because i'd
> like to
> ask for a release of xbean (which is now dependant on genesis)
> The xbean release is needed to release the jencks project which has
> been
> updated to G 1.1, and which is a dependency of ServiceMix.
> ServiceMix also
> depends on the snapshot car-plugin for G.
> ... and I was hoping i would be able to ask for a ServiceMix
> release in a few
> weeks ...
>
> Seriously, i can put it anywhere you want, but i really need a
> released
> version asap, and not have to wait 3 or 4 months until 1.1.2 is
> shipped.
>
> Well, i always have the possibility to build it and deploy it in
> ServiceMix
> private repo under a timestamped version (but not a snapshots).
> But I'm sure i'm not the only one in this case and I'd rather do it
> the right way.
>
>
> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote: I think we
> just add it to 1.1, leave it as a snapshot plugin for the
> moment, and then release it when 1.1.2 rolls out.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
> > -1 on adding it to 1.1.1. Put it in 1.1.2. 1.1.1 has been
> > delayed for a few weeks for minor changes.
> >
> > Jason Dillon wrote:
> >> On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon < jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> >>> Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have it done
> >>> right now and all is good... but defs for 1.1.2.
> >>>
> >>> It's done and it works for my plugins. That does not mean there
> >>> is no bugs.
> >> Mkay... so lets add it to branches/1.1, merge to 1.1.1 and include
> >> it in the release.
> >>> But we could always make a 1.1.1.1 with just that addition of the
> >>> plugin.
> >>>
> >>> Do you volunteer do release the full geronimo server, just to
> >>> include a plugin,
> >>> which would btw not be included in the distribution itself ?
> >> I'm not gonna volunteer to do any m1 related stuff :-P m2 stuff
> >> is killing me asis... :-\
> >> --jason
>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Thx a lot, Jason !
On 8/24/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 24, 2006, at 1:02 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > The downside of bypassing the release plugin, i.e. including
> > snapshots dependencies in a release, is that you can not make sure
> > you will be able to build it again in a few days. Snapshots are by
> > definition not stable and could be remove (they are for maven
> > stuff) from
> > the repository once the stable version is released.
>
> I agree. I just don't want to duplicate all that config.
>
>
> > If xbean is only dependant on project-config and you could release
> > that
> > without a snapshot dep, that would be cool :)
> >
> > For the release, I' d like to make it asap. let's say at the
> > beginning of
> > next
> > week ?
>
> I will work on it and have something for you EOD Sunday PST.
>
> --jason
>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
On Aug 24, 2006, at 1:02 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> The downside of bypassing the release plugin, i.e. including
> snapshots dependencies in a release, is that you can not make sure
> you will be able to build it again in a few days. Snapshots are by
> definition not stable and could be remove (they are for maven
> stuff) from
> the repository once the stable version is released.
I agree. I just don't want to duplicate all that config.
> If xbean is only dependant on project-config and you could release
> that
> without a snapshot dep, that would be cool :)
>
> For the release, I' d like to make it asap. let's say at the
> beginning of
> next
> week ?
I will work on it and have something for you EOD Sunday PST.
--jason
Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
The downside of bypassing the release plugin, i.e. including
snapshots dependencies in a release, is that you can not make sure
you will be able to build it again in a few days. Snapshots are by
definition not stable and could be remove (they are for maven stuff) from
the repository once the stable version is released.
If xbean is only dependant on project-config and you could release that
without a snapshot dep, that would be cool :)
For the release, I' d like to make it asap. let's say at the beginning of
next
week ?
On 8/24/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>
> Are you using the release plugin?
>
> I can make a Genesis release, which will still have a few plugins
> using snaps by doing it by hand. Some of the bits are core maven
> plugins with bugs and we need to wait for them to release new versions.
>
> Personally I think that is okay for an initial release.
>
> I had also considered (just a few minutes ago) making project-config
> independent from Genesis... this is the important bit for sub-
> projects anyways, as its got ~600 lines of config that is common to
> all top level poms.
>
> When do you plan on making the xbean release?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Aug 24, 2006, at 12:43 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> > Jason, I think there are some problems with releasing Genesis,
> > as it depends on snapshot versions of maven stuff.
> > Would it be possible to release a 0.1 version reverting to the
> > non-snapshot maven jars, and switch back just after that ?
> >
> > Or maybe we should revert back to our old standalone pom,
> > and use genesis once these issues are solved.
> > What does genesis offer to xbean ? I guess you did that
> > for the maven site css, right ?
> >
> > On 8/24/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> No, there was not.
> >>
> >> Jason, what' s the added value of genesis for xbean right now ?
> >> If it prevent us to release, can we wait a bit or revert ?
> >>
> >> I think Jason did that to use the geronimo css for xbean maven site.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8/24/06, Alan D. Cabrera <ad...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Good question. What is genesis? Did I miss an RTC vote?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Alan
> >> >
> >> > Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> >> > > Does xbean need genesis?
> >> > >
> >> > > -dain
> >> > >
> >> > > On Aug 23, 2006, at 6:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Do we really want xbean dependent on genesis? Seems like
> >> it's not
> >> > >> working out too well.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> -David
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Begin forwarded message:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> From: "Guillaume Nodet" < gnodet@gmail.com>
> >> > >>> Date: August 23, 2006 1:44:02 PM PDT
> >> > >>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> >> > >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
> >> > >>> Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> I would totally agree with you if maven allows you to release
> >> > >>> something which
> >> > >>> is dependant on a snapshot (even a plugin). Which
> >> unfortunately is
> >> > >>> not the case ...
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Btw, a non snapshot release of genesis would be nice,
> >> because i'd
> >> > >>> like to
> >> > >>> ask for a release of xbean (which is now dependant on genesis)
> >> > >>> The xbean release is needed to release the jencks project
> >> which has
> >> > >>> been
> >> > >>> updated to G 1.1, and which is a dependency of ServiceMix.
> >> > >>> ServiceMix also
> >> > >>> depends on the snapshot car-plugin for G.
> >> > >>> ... and I was hoping i would be able to ask for a ServiceMix
> >> release
> >> > >>> in a few
> >> > >>> weeks ...
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Seriously, i can put it anywhere you want, but i really need a
> >> > released
> >> > >>> version asap, and not have to wait 3 or 4 months until 1.1.2 is
> >> > >>> shipped.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Well, i always have the possibility to build it and deploy
> >> it in
> >> > >>> ServiceMix
> >> > >>> private repo under a timestamped version (but not a snapshots).
> >> > >>> But I'm sure i'm not the only one in this case and I'd
> >> rather do it
> >> > >>> the right way.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote: I think
> >> we just
> >> > >>> add it to 1.1, leave it as a snapshot plugin for the
> >> > >>> moment, and then release it when 1.1.2 rolls out.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> --jason
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> > -1 on adding it to 1.1.1. Put it in 1.1.2. 1.1.1 has been
> >> > >>> > delayed for a few weeks for minor changes.
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > Jason Dillon wrote:
> >> > >>> >> On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >> > >>> >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon < jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> >> > >>> >>> Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have
> >> it done
> >> > >>> >>> right now and all is good... but defs for 1.1.2.
> >> > >>> >>>
> >> > >>> >>> It's done and it works for my plugins. That does not
> >> mean there
> >> >
> >> > >>> >>> is no bugs.
> >> > >>> >> Mkay... so lets add it to branches/1.1, merge to 1.1.1 and
> >> > include
> >> > >>> >> it in the release.
> >> > >>> >>> But we could always make a 1.1.1.1 with just that
> >> addition of
> >> > the
> >> > >>> >>> plugin.
> >> > >>> >>>
> >> > >>> >>> Do you volunteer do release the full geronimo server,
> >> just to
> >> > >>> >>> include a plugin,
> >> > >>> >>> which would btw not be included in the distribution
> >> itself ?
> >> > >>> >> I'm not gonna volunteer to do any m1 related stuff :-P
> >> m2 stuff
> >> > >>> >> is killing me asis... :-\
> >> > >>> >> --jason
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> --Cheers,
> >> > >>> Guillaume Nodet
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Are you using the release plugin?
I can make a Genesis release, which will still have a few plugins
using snaps by doing it by hand. Some of the bits are core maven
plugins with bugs and we need to wait for them to release new versions.
Personally I think that is okay for an initial release.
I had also considered (just a few minutes ago) making project-config
independent from Genesis... this is the important bit for sub-
projects anyways, as its got ~600 lines of config that is common to
all top level poms.
When do you plan on making the xbean release?
--jason
On Aug 24, 2006, at 12:43 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Jason, I think there are some problems with releasing Genesis,
> as it depends on snapshot versions of maven stuff.
> Would it be possible to release a 0.1 version reverting to the
> non-snapshot maven jars, and switch back just after that ?
>
> Or maybe we should revert back to our old standalone pom,
> and use genesis once these issues are solved.
> What does genesis offer to xbean ? I guess you did that
> for the maven site css, right ?
>
> On 8/24/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> No, there was not.
>>
>> Jason, what' s the added value of genesis for xbean right now ?
>> If it prevent us to release, can we wait a bit or revert ?
>>
>> I think Jason did that to use the geronimo css for xbean maven site.
>>
>>
>> On 8/24/06, Alan D. Cabrera <ad...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Good question. What is genesis? Did I miss an RTC vote?
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Alan
>> >
>> > Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>> > > Does xbean need genesis?
>> > >
>> > > -dain
>> > >
>> > > On Aug 23, 2006, at 6:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Do we really want xbean dependent on genesis? Seems like
>> it's not
>> > >> working out too well.
>> > >>
>> > >> -David
>> > >>
>> > >> Begin forwarded message:
>> > >>
>> > >>> From: "Guillaume Nodet" < gnodet@gmail.com>
>> > >>> Date: August 23, 2006 1:44:02 PM PDT
>> > >>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>> > >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
>> > >>> Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I would totally agree with you if maven allows you to release
>> > >>> something which
>> > >>> is dependant on a snapshot (even a plugin). Which
>> unfortunately is
>> > >>> not the case ...
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Btw, a non snapshot release of genesis would be nice,
>> because i'd
>> > >>> like to
>> > >>> ask for a release of xbean (which is now dependant on genesis)
>> > >>> The xbean release is needed to release the jencks project
>> which has
>> > >>> been
>> > >>> updated to G 1.1, and which is a dependency of ServiceMix.
>> > >>> ServiceMix also
>> > >>> depends on the snapshot car-plugin for G.
>> > >>> ... and I was hoping i would be able to ask for a ServiceMix
>> release
>> > >>> in a few
>> > >>> weeks ...
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Seriously, i can put it anywhere you want, but i really need a
>> > released
>> > >>> version asap, and not have to wait 3 or 4 months until 1.1.2 is
>> > >>> shipped.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Well, i always have the possibility to build it and deploy
>> it in
>> > >>> ServiceMix
>> > >>> private repo under a timestamped version (but not a snapshots).
>> > >>> But I'm sure i'm not the only one in this case and I'd
>> rather do it
>> > >>> the right way.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote: I think
>> we just
>> > >>> add it to 1.1, leave it as a snapshot plugin for the
>> > >>> moment, and then release it when 1.1.2 rolls out.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --jason
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> > -1 on adding it to 1.1.1. Put it in 1.1.2. 1.1.1 has been
>> > >>> > delayed for a few weeks for minor changes.
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Jason Dillon wrote:
>> > >>> >> On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> > >>> >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon < jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>> > >>> >>> Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have
>> it done
>> > >>> >>> right now and all is good... but defs for 1.1.2.
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> It's done and it works for my plugins. That does not
>> mean there
>> >
>> > >>> >>> is no bugs.
>> > >>> >> Mkay... so lets add it to branches/1.1, merge to 1.1.1 and
>> > include
>> > >>> >> it in the release.
>> > >>> >>> But we could always make a 1.1.1.1 with just that
>> addition of
>> > the
>> > >>> >>> plugin.
>> > >>> >>>
>> > >>> >>> Do you volunteer do release the full geronimo server,
>> just to
>> > >>> >>> include a plugin,
>> > >>> >>> which would btw not be included in the distribution
>> itself ?
>> > >>> >> I'm not gonna volunteer to do any m1 related stuff :-P
>> m2 stuff
>> > >>> >> is killing me asis... :-\
>> > >>> >> --jason
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --Cheers,
>> > >>> Guillaume Nodet
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Jason, I think there are some problems with releasing Genesis,
as it depends on snapshot versions of maven stuff.
Would it be possible to release a 0.1 version reverting to the
non-snapshot maven jars, and switch back just after that ?
Or maybe we should revert back to our old standalone pom,
and use genesis once these issues are solved.
What does genesis offer to xbean ? I guess you did that
for the maven site css, right ?
On 8/24/06, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No, there was not.
>
> Jason, what' s the added value of genesis for xbean right now ?
> If it prevent us to release, can we wait a bit or revert ?
>
> I think Jason did that to use the geronimo css for xbean maven site.
>
>
> On 8/24/06, Alan D. Cabrera <ad...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> >
> > Good question. What is genesis? Did I miss an RTC vote?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> > Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> > > Does xbean need genesis?
> > >
> > > -dain
> > >
> > > On Aug 23, 2006, at 6:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> > >
> > >> Do we really want xbean dependent on genesis? Seems like it's not
> > >> working out too well.
> > >>
> > >> -David
> > >>
> > >> Begin forwarded message:
> > >>
> > >>> From: "Guillaume Nodet" < gnodet@gmail.com>
> > >>> Date: August 23, 2006 1:44:02 PM PDT
> > >>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> > >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
> > >>> Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>> I would totally agree with you if maven allows you to release
> > >>> something which
> > >>> is dependant on a snapshot (even a plugin). Which unfortunately is
> > >>> not the case ...
> > >>>
> > >>> Btw, a non snapshot release of genesis would be nice, because i'd
> > >>> like to
> > >>> ask for a release of xbean (which is now dependant on genesis)
> > >>> The xbean release is needed to release the jencks project which has
> > >>> been
> > >>> updated to G 1.1, and which is a dependency of ServiceMix.
> > >>> ServiceMix also
> > >>> depends on the snapshot car-plugin for G.
> > >>> ... and I was hoping i would be able to ask for a ServiceMix release
> > >>> in a few
> > >>> weeks ...
> > >>>
> > >>> Seriously, i can put it anywhere you want, but i really need a
> > released
> > >>> version asap, and not have to wait 3 or 4 months until 1.1.2 is
> > >>> shipped.
> > >>>
> > >>> Well, i always have the possibility to build it and deploy it in
> > >>> ServiceMix
> > >>> private repo under a timestamped version (but not a snapshots).
> > >>> But I'm sure i'm not the only one in this case and I'd rather do it
> > >>> the right way.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote: I think we just
> > >>> add it to 1.1, leave it as a snapshot plugin for the
> > >>> moment, and then release it when 1.1.2 rolls out.
> > >>>
> > >>> --jason
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > -1 on adding it to 1.1.1. Put it in 1.1.2. 1.1.1 has been
> > >>> > delayed for a few weeks for minor changes.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Jason Dillon wrote:
> > >>> >> On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > >>> >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon < jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> > >>> >>> Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have it done
> > >>> >>> right now and all is good... but defs for 1.1.2.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> It's done and it works for my plugins. That does not mean there
> >
> > >>> >>> is no bugs.
> > >>> >> Mkay... so lets add it to branches/1.1, merge to 1.1.1 and
> > include
> > >>> >> it in the release.
> > >>> >>> But we could always make a 1.1.1.1 with just that addition of
> > the
> > >>> >>> plugin.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> Do you volunteer do release the full geronimo server, just to
> > >>> >>> include a plugin,
> > >>> >>> which would btw not be included in the distribution itself ?
> > >>> >> I'm not gonna volunteer to do any m1 related stuff :-P m2 stuff
> > >>> >> is killing me asis... :-\
> > >>> >> --jason
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --Cheers,
> > >>> Guillaume Nodet
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
No, there was not.
Jason, what' s the added value of genesis for xbean right now ?
If it prevent us to release, can we wait a bit or revert ?
I think Jason did that to use the geronimo css for xbean maven site.
On 8/24/06, Alan D. Cabrera <ad...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
> Good question. What is genesis? Did I miss an RTC vote?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> > Does xbean need genesis?
> >
> > -dain
> >
> > On Aug 23, 2006, at 6:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> >
> >> Do we really want xbean dependent on genesis? Seems like it's not
> >> working out too well.
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >> Begin forwarded message:
> >>
> >>> From: "Guillaume Nodet" <gn...@gmail.com>
> >>> Date: August 23, 2006 1:44:02 PM PDT
> >>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
> >>> Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> >>>
> >>> I would totally agree with you if maven allows you to release
> >>> something which
> >>> is dependant on a snapshot (even a plugin). Which unfortunately is
> >>> not the case ...
> >>>
> >>> Btw, a non snapshot release of genesis would be nice, because i'd
> >>> like to
> >>> ask for a release of xbean (which is now dependant on genesis)
> >>> The xbean release is needed to release the jencks project which has
> >>> been
> >>> updated to G 1.1, and which is a dependency of ServiceMix.
> >>> ServiceMix also
> >>> depends on the snapshot car-plugin for G.
> >>> ... and I was hoping i would be able to ask for a ServiceMix release
> >>> in a few
> >>> weeks ...
> >>>
> >>> Seriously, i can put it anywhere you want, but i really need a
> released
> >>> version asap, and not have to wait 3 or 4 months until 1.1.2 is
> >>> shipped.
> >>>
> >>> Well, i always have the possibility to build it and deploy it in
> >>> ServiceMix
> >>> private repo under a timestamped version (but not a snapshots).
> >>> But I'm sure i'm not the only one in this case and I'd rather do it
> >>> the right way.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote: I think we just
> >>> add it to 1.1, leave it as a snapshot plugin for the
> >>> moment, and then release it when 1.1.2 rolls out.
> >>>
> >>> --jason
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > -1 on adding it to 1.1.1. Put it in 1.1.2. 1.1.1 has been
> >>> > delayed for a few weeks for minor changes.
> >>> >
> >>> > Jason Dillon wrote:
> >>> >> On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >>> >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon < jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> >>> >>> Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have it done
> >>> >>> right now and all is good... but defs for 1.1.2.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> It's done and it works for my plugins. That does not mean there
> >>> >>> is no bugs.
> >>> >> Mkay... so lets add it to branches/1.1, merge to 1.1.1 and include
> >>> >> it in the release.
> >>> >>> But we could always make a 1.1.1.1 with just that addition of the
> >>> >>> plugin.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Do you volunteer do release the full geronimo server, just to
> >>> >>> include a plugin,
> >>> >>> which would btw not be included in the distribution itself ?
> >>> >> I'm not gonna volunteer to do any m1 related stuff :-P m2 stuff
> >>> >> is killing me asis... :-\
> >>> >> --jason
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --Cheers,
> >>> Guillaume Nodet
> >
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <ad...@toolazydogs.com>.
Good question. What is genesis? Did I miss an RTC vote?
Regards,
Alan
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> Does xbean need genesis?
>
> -dain
>
> On Aug 23, 2006, at 6:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> Do we really want xbean dependent on genesis? Seems like it's not
>> working out too well.
>>
>> -David
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: "Guillaume Nodet" <gn...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: August 23, 2006 1:44:02 PM PDT
>>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
>>> Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>>>
>>> I would totally agree with you if maven allows you to release
>>> something which
>>> is dependant on a snapshot (even a plugin). Which unfortunately is
>>> not the case ...
>>>
>>> Btw, a non snapshot release of genesis would be nice, because i'd
>>> like to
>>> ask for a release of xbean (which is now dependant on genesis)
>>> The xbean release is needed to release the jencks project which has
>>> been
>>> updated to G 1.1, and which is a dependency of ServiceMix.
>>> ServiceMix also
>>> depends on the snapshot car-plugin for G.
>>> ... and I was hoping i would be able to ask for a ServiceMix release
>>> in a few
>>> weeks ...
>>>
>>> Seriously, i can put it anywhere you want, but i really need a released
>>> version asap, and not have to wait 3 or 4 months until 1.1.2 is
>>> shipped.
>>>
>>> Well, i always have the possibility to build it and deploy it in
>>> ServiceMix
>>> private repo under a timestamped version (but not a snapshots).
>>> But I'm sure i'm not the only one in this case and I'd rather do it
>>> the right way.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote: I think we just
>>> add it to 1.1, leave it as a snapshot plugin for the
>>> moment, and then release it when 1.1.2 rolls out.
>>>
>>> --jason
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>
>>> > -1 on adding it to 1.1.1. Put it in 1.1.2. 1.1.1 has been
>>> > delayed for a few weeks for minor changes.
>>> >
>>> > Jason Dillon wrote:
>>> >> On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>> >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon < jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>>> >>> Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have it done
>>> >>> right now and all is good... but defs for 1.1.2.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> It's done and it works for my plugins. That does not mean there
>>> >>> is no bugs.
>>> >> Mkay... so lets add it to branches/1.1, merge to 1.1.1 and include
>>> >> it in the release.
>>> >>> But we could always make a 1.1.1.1 with just that addition of the
>>> >>> plugin.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Do you volunteer do release the full geronimo server, just to
>>> >>> include a plugin,
>>> >>> which would btw not be included in the distribution itself ?
>>> >> I'm not gonna volunteer to do any m1 related stuff :-P m2 stuff
>>> >> is killing me asis... :-\
>>> >> --jason
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
Does xbean need genesis?
-dain
On Aug 23, 2006, at 6:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Do we really want xbean dependent on genesis? Seems like it's not
> working out too well.
>
> -David
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: "Guillaume Nodet" <gn...@gmail.com>
>> Date: August 23, 2006 1:44:02 PM PDT
>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Car maven plugin dedicated to G 1.1
>> Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>>
>> I would totally agree with you if maven allows you to release
>> something which
>> is dependant on a snapshot (even a plugin). Which unfortunately
>> is not the case ...
>>
>> Btw, a non snapshot release of genesis would be nice, because i'd
>> like to
>> ask for a release of xbean (which is now dependant on genesis)
>> The xbean release is needed to release the jencks project which
>> has been
>> updated to G 1.1, and which is a dependency of ServiceMix.
>> ServiceMix also
>> depends on the snapshot car-plugin for G.
>> ... and I was hoping i would be able to ask for a ServiceMix
>> release in a few
>> weeks ...
>>
>> Seriously, i can put it anywhere you want, but i really need a
>> released
>> version asap, and not have to wait 3 or 4 months until 1.1.2 is
>> shipped.
>>
>> Well, i always have the possibility to build it and deploy it in
>> ServiceMix
>> private repo under a timestamped version (but not a snapshots).
>> But I'm sure i'm not the only one in this case and I'd rather do it
>> the right way.
>>
>>
>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote: I think we
>> just add it to 1.1, leave it as a snapshot plugin for the
>> moment, and then release it when 1.1.2 rolls out.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>
>> > -1 on adding it to 1.1.1. Put it in 1.1.2. 1.1.1 has been
>> > delayed for a few weeks for minor changes.
>> >
>> > Jason Dillon wrote:
>> >> On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> >>> On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon < jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>> >>> Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have it done
>> >>> right now and all is good... but defs for 1.1.2.
>> >>>
>> >>> It's done and it works for my plugins. That does not mean there
>> >>> is no bugs.
>> >> Mkay... so lets add it to branches/1.1, merge to 1.1.1 and include
>> >> it in the release.
>> >>> But we could always make a 1.1.1.1 with just that addition of the
>> >>> plugin.
>> >>>
>> >>> Do you volunteer do release the full geronimo server, just to
>> >>> include a plugin,
>> >>> which would btw not be included in the distribution itself ?
>> >> I'm not gonna volunteer to do any m1 related stuff :-P m2 stuff
>> >> is killing me asis... :-\
>> >> --jason
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet