You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/04/25 16:23:12 UTC
[jira] [Closed] (DERBY-6885) Remove ReuseFactory
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Knut Anders Hatlen closed DERBY-6885.
-------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 10.13.0.0
Issue & fix info: (was: Patch Available)
> Remove ReuseFactory
> -------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6885
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6885
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Services
> Affects Versions: 10.13.0.0
> Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
> Assignee: Knut Anders Hatlen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 10.13.0.0
>
> Attachments: d6885.diff
>
>
> ReuseFactory used to help reduce object allocations when converting numbers/booleans from primitive types to object types. After DERBY-2383 and DERBY-6230, the ReuseFactory methods are just wrappers around standard library methods such as Integer.valueOf() and Long.valueOf().
> Callers could just as easily call the corresponding valueOf() method directly, or rely on auto-boxing. Both ways use the same cache as ReuseFactory currently does, so ReuseFactory has no purpose anymore.
> One exception: ReuseFactory.getZeroLenByteArray() is still used and provides value, as it avoids the allocation cost when an empty byte array is needed. The ArrayUtil class is probably just as good a home for it, so I propose we move it there and remove the ReuseFactory class.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)