You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@lucene.apache.org by "zhangchao.es (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/07/15 08:42:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10025)
SoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy#numDeletesToMerge caused indexing
backlogged
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17381172#comment-17381172 ]
zhangchao.es commented on LUCENE-10025:
---------------------------------------
[~simonw] Can you please take a look?
> SoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy#numDeletesToMerge caused indexing backlogged
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10025
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10025
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/index
> Affects Versions: 8.4
> Reporter: zhangchao.es
> Priority: Major
> Labels: indexing, soft-delete
> Attachments: flamegraph.html, image-2021-07-14-16-52-34-740.png
>
>
> In lucene-8246, numDeletesToMerge is added in SoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy.
> if soft deleted docs is very more, and they are also in retention lease,the numDeletesToMerge funcation have performance issue
> for instance，a update indexing is writing to elasticsearch, then we move one a shard to an other node,If the moving continues for a long time, the size of old shard will become very big,because soft-deleted operations need to held by retention lease. The more soft-deleted documents, the slower the indexing. if the shard size is about 20GB, we can get the below flamegraph
>
> !image-2021-07-14-16-52-34-740.png!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org