You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by ma...@apache.org on 2008/07/27 15:33:32 UTC
svn commit: r680102 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
Author: markt
Date: Sun Jul 27 06:33:31 2008
New Revision: 680102
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=680102&view=rev
Log:
Fix RDF as per report on users list
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf?rev=680102&r1=680101&r2=680102&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf (original)
+++ tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf Sun Jul 27 06:33:31 2008
@@ -34,11 +34,15 @@
<created>2006-04-14</created>
<revision>5.5.17</revision>
</Version>
+ </release>
+ <release>
<Version>
<name>5.5.16</name>
<created>2006-03-05</created>
<revision>5.5.16</revision>
</Version>
+ </release>
+ <release>
<Version>
<name>5.5.15</name>
<created>2006-01-23</created>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r680102 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> markt@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Sun Jul 27 06:33:31 2008
>>> New Revision: 680102
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=680102&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Fix RDF as per report on users list
>>
>> This is now fixed but the data is horribly out of date? Does anyone
>> care about this file? If not, better to delete it than to provide
>> information that is two years out of date.
>
> For starters, try the attached.
I've committed something similar. Note 6.0.18 isn't released yet.
> Is part of the flaw that it's not in the xdocs origin tree? Maybe leaving
> this in plain site for authoring would make it easier to keep it in sync.
Possibly but I suspect it is more than to with the fact the none of the
committers use/care about the information. We'll see if it gets kept up to
date now.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r680102 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Mark Thomas wrote:
> markt@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Sun Jul 27 06:33:31 2008
>> New Revision: 680102
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=680102&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix RDF as per report on users list
>
> This is now fixed but the data is horribly out of date? Does anyone care
> about this file? If not, better to delete it than to provide information
> that is two years out of date.
For starters, try the attached.
Is part of the flaw that it's not in the xdocs origin tree? Maybe leaving
this in plain site for authoring would make it easier to keep it in sync.
Re: svn commit: r680102 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> markt@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Sun Jul 27 06:33:31 2008
>>> New Revision: 680102
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=680102&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Fix RDF as per report on users list
>>
>> This is now fixed but the data is horribly out of date? Does anyone
>> care about this file? If not, better to delete it than to provide
>> information that is two years out of date.
>
> Hmm... see http://projects.apache.org/indexes/quick.html
>
> I don't suppose we want tomcat falling off that list?
Speaking of which, none of my projects seemed to understand the fields
required for presentation of
http://projects.apache.org/indexes/releases.html
(or that page is just broken :). Will research, if I learn anything I'm
happy to update tomcat's doap as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r680102 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Mark Thomas wrote:
> markt@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Sun Jul 27 06:33:31 2008
>> New Revision: 680102
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=680102&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix RDF as per report on users list
>
> This is now fixed but the data is horribly out of date? Does anyone care
> about this file? If not, better to delete it than to provide information
> that is two years out of date.
Hmm... see http://projects.apache.org/indexes/quick.html
I don't suppose we want tomcat falling off that list?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r680102 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
markt@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Sun Jul 27 06:33:31 2008
> New Revision: 680102
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=680102&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix RDF as per report on users list
This is now fixed but the data is horribly out of date? Does anyone care
about this file? If not, better to delete it than to provide information
that is two years out of date.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org