You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to docs@httpd.apache.org by Sander Temme <sc...@apache.org> on 2006/06/11 22:38:16 UTC
Backport policy for docs?
Folks,
Do we have a backport policy for documentation? I specifically would
like to backport r409455 from trunk to 2.2.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/
mod_proxy.xml?r1=395228&r2=409455
Thanks,
S. (just joined docs@ a little while ago)
--
sctemme@apache.org http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
Re: Backport policy for docs?
Posted by Sander Temme <sa...@temme.net>.
On Jun 11, 2006, at 3:10 PM, noodl wrote:
> On 6/11/06, Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca> wrote:
>> On 6/11/06, Sander Temme <sc...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Do we have a backport policy for documentation? I specifically
>> would
>> > like to backport r409455 from trunk to 2.2.
>> >
>> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/
>> > mod_proxy.xml?r1=395228&r2=409455
>>
>> The policy is: fire away. No need for votes or anything (although
>> you
>> might want to consult the list for something very major; the patch
>> above certainly wouldn't qualify as major).
>
> If you do, could I suggest that "Otherwise the resulting requests to
> the backend may miss some needed slashes and do not deliver the
> expected results." isn't gramatically correct? Drop the 'do', perhaps.
Good point. I'll try to reformulate that into a little bit more
formal language if I have a moment to meditate.
S.
--
sander@temme.net http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
Re: Backport policy for docs?
Posted by noodl <no...@gmail.com>.
On 6/11/06, Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca> wrote:
> On 6/11/06, Sander Temme <sc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Do we have a backport policy for documentation? I specifically would
> > like to backport r409455 from trunk to 2.2.
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/
> > mod_proxy.xml?r1=395228&r2=409455
>
> The policy is: fire away. No need for votes or anything (although you
> might want to consult the list for something very major; the patch
> above certainly wouldn't qualify as major).
If you do, could I suggest that "Otherwise the resulting requests to
the backend may miss some needed slashes and do not deliver the
expected results." isn't gramatically correct? Drop the 'do', perhaps.
Just my 2p.
noodl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: Backport policy for docs?
Posted by Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>.
On 6/11/06, Sander Temme <sc...@apache.org> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Do we have a backport policy for documentation? I specifically would
> like to backport r409455 from trunk to 2.2.
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/
> mod_proxy.xml?r1=395228&r2=409455
The policy is: fire away. No need for votes or anything (although you
might want to consult the list for something very major; the patch
above certainly wouldn't qualify as major).
Joshua.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org