You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@activemq.apache.org by "TuoDi (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/01/10 07:01:58 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-796) Client may shtudown when failover connection is reconnecting. We need to maintain at least 1 non-daemon thread alive.

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814130#comment-15814130 ] 

TuoDi commented on AMQ-796:
---------------------------

Yes,we have the some problem in activemq 5.10.0 and 5.13.4. we use failover tcp protocol like
failover://(tcp://127.0.0.1:61624,tcp://127.0.0.1:61626)?nested.wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=3000&nested.connectionTimeout=2000&maxReconnectAttempts=2&timeout=2000&randomize=false&initialReconnectDelay=50&startupMaxReconnectAttempts=2&maxReconnectDelay=100
use the at

> Client may shtudown when failover connection is reconnecting.  We need to maintain at least 1 non-daemon thread alive.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-796
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-796
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.0, 5.3.0
>            Reporter: Hiram Chirino
>            Assignee: Rob Davies
>             Fix For: 5.6.0, 4.0.3
>
>         Attachments: AMQ-796.cmd, jstack_amq_5.6.0, jstack_v5.8.0
>
>
> Dejan Reported on the User lists:
> Hi,
> after some experiments I found that this problem only exists if there are no
> other threads in the application. It seems like connection thread dies
> before it manages to reconnect. By starting another thread in the
> application, it succeeds to recover from master failure and reconnect to the
> slave broker. So I have a workaround for now, but it would be nice to make
> this work even for simple (single-threaded) clients.
> Regards,
> Dejan



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)