which ZooKeeper version?

[David Peterson <da...@newrelic.com>]

Is there any compelling reason to use the latest stable ZooKeeper instead of the 3.3.4 version included with the Kafka distribution?

We’re not using ZooKeeper for any other application - we’re only running it because it’s a Kafka dependency.

Thank you,
-dave.

Re: which ZooKeeper version?

[Clark Breyman <cl...@breyman.com>]

David - We're currently running 3.4.6 without issues, though our load is
modest.
Clark


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Neha Narkhede <ne...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Through our experience of operating zookeeper in production at LinkedIn, we
> found 3.3.4 to be very stable. It is likely at 3.4.x is stable now, but we
> can't say for sure as we haven't had a chance to deploy 3.4.x in production
> yet.
>
> Thanks,
> Neha
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:13 PM, David Peterson <da...@newrelic.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Is there any compelling reason to use the latest stable ZooKeeper instead
> > of the 3.3.4 version included with the Kafka distribution?
> >
> > We’re not using ZooKeeper for any other application - we’re only running
> > it because it’s a Kafka dependency.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > -dave.
> >
> >
>

Re: which ZooKeeper version?

[Neha Narkhede <ne...@gmail.com>]

Through our experience of operating zookeeper in production at LinkedIn, we
found 3.3.4 to be very stable. It is likely at 3.4.x is stable now, but we
can't say for sure as we haven't had a chance to deploy 3.4.x in production
yet.

Thanks,
Neha


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:13 PM, David Peterson <da...@newrelic.com> wrote:

>
> Is there any compelling reason to use the latest stable ZooKeeper instead
> of the 3.3.4 version included with the Kafka distribution?
>
> We’re not using ZooKeeper for any other application - we’re only running
> it because it’s a Kafka dependency.
>
> Thank you,
> -dave.
>
>