You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> on 2017/09/18 17:13:23 UTC
[VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the release.
Vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-dev/201709.mbox/%
3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Result thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-dev/201709.mbox/%
3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
40mail.gmail.com%3E
The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
.0-incubating-rc2/src
The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
The Nexus Staging URL:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetephra-1010
Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
KEYS file available:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
For information about the contents of this release, see:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
.0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
The vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
Thanks,
Andreas
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com>.
They have removed the LGPL code. Not removing the license as well is an
oversight.
Alan.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me otherwise.
>
> TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified, however it doesn't
> seem to have been solved properly.
>
> - The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE file for Guice.
> There is no need to declare the license usage for single licensed code.
> - You added the LGPL license. You cannot include LGPL binaries. However,
> I can't find the binaries so it should probably just be omitted.
>
> Other things look fine.
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
> > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> >
> > The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the release.
> >
> > Vote thread:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-
> dev/201709.mbox/%
> > 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com
> %3E
> > <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-
> dev/201709.mbox/%3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsX
> QuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
> >
> > Result thread:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-
> dev/201709.mbox/%
> > 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
> > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > .0-incubating-rc2/src
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> >
> > The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
> >
> > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetephra-1010
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> >
> > KEYS file available:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andreas
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>.
John - that would be me. You wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:56 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:
I'm fine with giving a +1 assuming the NOTICE issue is fixed for next
release. Please feel free to ping me if you want a review of the NOTICE
contents before release.
John
I did not read that as vote but a willingness to give that +1 vote. I must
have misunderstood.
I am going count this as a +1 now.
Thanks -Andreas
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:44 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Who feels I didn't change my vote? You didn't copy the whole thread so its
> hard to tell.
>
> John
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:08 PM James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > John - there appears to be some confusion. Would you mind clearing up
> > whether you voted or not? Sorry for bugging you.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:30 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I thought John already changed his vote to +1 based on this comment,
> no?
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:56 PM, John D. Ament <
> johndament@apache.org>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> I'm fine with giving a +1 assuming the NOTICE issue is fixed for
> next
> > >> >> release. Please feel free to ping me if you want a review of the
> > >> NOTICE
> > >> >> contents before release.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> John
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Who feels I didn't change my vote? You didn't copy the whole thread so its
hard to tell.
John
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:08 PM James Taylor <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> John - there appears to be some confusion. Would you mind clearing up
> whether you voted or not? Sorry for bugging you.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:30 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I thought John already changed his vote to +1 based on this comment, no?
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:56 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I'm fine with giving a +1 assuming the NOTICE issue is fixed for next
> >> >> release. Please feel free to ping me if you want a review of the
> >> NOTICE
> >> >> contents before release.
> >> >>
> >> >> John
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
John - there appears to be some confusion. Would you mind clearing up
whether you voted or not? Sorry for bugging you.
Thanks,
James
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:30 PM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> I thought John already changed his vote to +1 based on this comment, no?
>
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:56 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'm fine with giving a +1 assuming the NOTICE issue is fixed for next
>> >> release. Please feel free to ping me if you want a review of the
>> NOTICE
>> >> contents before release.
>> >>
>> >> John
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
I thought John already changed his vote to +1 based on this comment, no?
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:56 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I'm fine with giving a +1 assuming the NOTICE issue is fixed for next
> >> release. Please feel free to ping me if you want a review of the NOTICE
> >> contents before release.
> >>
> >> John
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>.
John - we'd appreciate your vote so that we can proceed with the release.
Thanks -Andreas.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> John - we will fix this as one of the first things after release, and will
> appreciate your feedback early-on, so that this is not an issue again.
> Thanks -Andreas
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:56 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm fine with giving a +1 assuming the NOTICE issue is fixed for next
>> release. Please feel free to ping me if you want a review of the NOTICE
>> contents before release.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:34 PM James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > John - thanks for the review. If things look acceptable now, would you
>> be
>> > willing to cast a vote?
>> >
>> > Anyone else?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > James
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:58 AM Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks, John! Is there anything else that we can do to address
>> > > concerns/issues regarding the release candidate?
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:26 AM, John D. Ament <
>> johndament@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:21 PM Gokul Gunasekaran <gokul@apache.org
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi John,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regarding your comment,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I
>> > > don't
>> > > > > see
>> > > > > > > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The LICENSE and NOTICE files that, are in the distribution, are
>> > present
>> > > > in
>> > > > > the tephra-distribution directory (named LICENSE_BINARY,
>> > > NOTICE_BINARY).
>> > > > > Please let us know if they should be placed in a different
>> location
>> > > and I
>> > > > > can address the same in the JIRA mentioned below.
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > It's fine to keep the binary copy of the NOTICE and LICENSE in your
>> > > source
>> > > > release. Clearly marking them this way works fine.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Also, let us know if you think we can proceed with the release. I
>> > have
>> > > > > opened JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-265) to
>> > > > address
>> > > > > the issue with the NOTICE file.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > Gokul
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Andreas Neumann <anew@apache.org
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > John, is this a show stopper, or would it be ok if we address
>> that
>> > > Jira
>> > > > > in
>> > > > > > the next release?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran <
>> > gokul@apache.org
>> > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks so much for the explanation, John! Really appreciate
>> it.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I have opened a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/
>> > > > jira/browse/TEPHRA-265
>> > > > > )
>> > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > fix this issue. Please let me know if you have any questions
>> or
>> > > > > comments
>> > > > > > > about the same.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:30 PM, John D. Ament <
>> > > > johndament@apache.org>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Gokul,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:14 PM Gokul Gunasekaran <
>> > > > gokul@apache.org>
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Hi John,
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the review of the release candidate.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > - NOTICE file for Guice: The NOTICE_BINARY file under
>> > > > > > > > tephra-distribution,
>> > > > > > > > > contains the notice for Guice. Please let us how we can
>> fix
>> > it
>> > > > and
>> > > > > we
>> > > > > > > > will
>> > > > > > > > > create a JIRA to fix this issue. We had followed the
>> example
>> > of
>> > > > > > > including
>> > > > > > > > > libraries that has Apache License 2.0 in NOTICE, similar
>> to
>> > the
>> > > > > > > Fineract
>> > > > > > > > > project.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Do you have an example? This is what your NOTICE file says:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Apache Tephra includes Guice v3.0 and Guice Assisted Inject
>> > v3.0.
>> > > > > > Tephra
>> > > > > > > > elects to include this software in this distribution under
>> the
>> > > > Apache
>> > > > > > > > License.
>> > > > > > > > You can obtain a copy of the License at:
>> > > > > > > > http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > NOTICE files are meant to copy verbatim the existing NOTICE
>> > file.
>> > > > > This
>> > > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > > what I see in the Guice 3 NOTICE files:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Google Guice - Core Library
>> > > > > > > > Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > This product includes software developed at
>> > > > > > > > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Google Guice - Extensions - AssistedInject
>> > > > > > > > Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > This product includes software developed at
>> > > > > > > > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file.
>> Likewise, I
>> > > > don't
>> > > > > > see
>> > > > > > > > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > RE Fineract. The last release I have of theres locally is
>> > 0.6.0
>> > > > and
>> > > > > it
>> > > > > > > > does not have these issues, so not sure where you're getting
>> > this
>> > > > > from.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > John
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > - LGPL License: The Release Candidate - 2 doesn't include
>> the
>> > > > LGPL
>> > > > > > > > license
>> > > > > > > > > at all. Do you see LGPL license included anywhere (this
>> might
>> > > > have
>> > > > > > been
>> > > > > > > > > present in the Release Candidate - 1 which was fixed in
>> > Release
>> > > > > > > > Candidate -
>> > > > > > > > > 2)?
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > Gokul
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament <
>> > > > > > johndament@apache.org>
>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me
>> > > otherwise.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified,
>> > however
>> > > it
>> > > > > > > doesn't
>> > > > > > > > > > seem to have been solved properly.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > - The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE
>> > file
>> > > > for
>> > > > > > > Guice.
>> > > > > > > > > > There is no need to declare the license usage for single
>> > > > licensed
>> > > > > > > code.
>> > > > > > > > > > - You added the LGPL license. You cannot include LGPL
>> > > > binaries.
>> > > > > > > > > However,
>> > > > > > > > > > I can't find the binaries so it should probably just be
>> > > > omitted.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Other things look fine.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > John
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM Andreas Neumann <
>> > > > anew@apache.org
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra
>> > > > > > > > 0.13.0-incubating,
>> > > > > > > > > > > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of
>> Tephra.
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the
>> > > > release.
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Vote thread:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
>> > > > > > > > > > v/201709.mbox/%
>> > > > > > > > > > > 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1Kt
>> gyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%
>> > > > > > > > 40mail.gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > > %3E
>> > > > > > > > > > > <
>> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-d
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > ev/201709.mbox/%3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xx
>> > > > > > > > > > PEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Result thread:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
>> > > > > > > > > > v/201709.mbox/%
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
>> > > > > > > > > > > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests,
>> etc.
>> > can
>> > > > be
>> > > > > > > found
>> > > > > > > > > at:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
>> > > > > > > > > > > .0-incubating-rc2/src
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
>> > > > > > > > > > > it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733
>> > > > bb470450d7:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
>> > > > > > > > > > > it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca8
>> 6f84eb61493733bb470450d7
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > The Nexus Staging URL:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> > > > > > > orgapachetephra-1010
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> > > > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > KEYS file available:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > For information about the contents of this release,
>> see:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
>> > > > > > > > > > > .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
>> > > > > > > > > 0.13.0-incubating
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra
>> > > > 0.13.0-incubating
>> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > > > Andreas
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>.
John - we will fix this as one of the first things after release, and will
appreciate your feedback early-on, so that this is not an issue again.
Thanks -Andreas
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:56 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> I'm fine with giving a +1 assuming the NOTICE issue is fixed for next
> release. Please feel free to ping me if you want a review of the NOTICE
> contents before release.
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:34 PM James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > John - thanks for the review. If things look acceptable now, would you be
> > willing to cast a vote?
> >
> > Anyone else?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:58 AM Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, John! Is there anything else that we can do to address
> > > concerns/issues regarding the release candidate?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:26 AM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:21 PM Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi John,
> > > > >
> > > > > Regarding your comment,
> > > > >
> > > > > > > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I
> > > don't
> > > > > see
> > > > > > > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The LICENSE and NOTICE files that, are in the distribution, are
> > present
> > > > in
> > > > > the tephra-distribution directory (named LICENSE_BINARY,
> > > NOTICE_BINARY).
> > > > > Please let us know if they should be placed in a different location
> > > and I
> > > > > can address the same in the JIRA mentioned below.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > It's fine to keep the binary copy of the NOTICE and LICENSE in your
> > > source
> > > > release. Clearly marking them this way works fine.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, let us know if you think we can proceed with the release. I
> > have
> > > > > opened JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-265) to
> > > > address
> > > > > the issue with the NOTICE file.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Gokul
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > John, is this a show stopper, or would it be ok if we address
> that
> > > Jira
> > > > > in
> > > > > > the next release?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran <
> > gokul@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks so much for the explanation, John! Really appreciate it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have opened a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/
> > > > jira/browse/TEPHRA-265
> > > > > )
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > fix this issue. Please let me know if you have any questions or
> > > > > comments
> > > > > > > about the same.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:30 PM, John D. Ament <
> > > > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Gokul,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:14 PM Gokul Gunasekaran <
> > > > gokul@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi John,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the review of the release candidate.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - NOTICE file for Guice: The NOTICE_BINARY file under
> > > > > > > > tephra-distribution,
> > > > > > > > > contains the notice for Guice. Please let us how we can fix
> > it
> > > > and
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > create a JIRA to fix this issue. We had followed the
> example
> > of
> > > > > > > including
> > > > > > > > > libraries that has Apache License 2.0 in NOTICE, similar to
> > the
> > > > > > > Fineract
> > > > > > > > > project.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Do you have an example? This is what your NOTICE file says:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Apache Tephra includes Guice v3.0 and Guice Assisted Inject
> > v3.0.
> > > > > > Tephra
> > > > > > > > elects to include this software in this distribution under
> the
> > > > Apache
> > > > > > > > License.
> > > > > > > > You can obtain a copy of the License at:
> > > > > > > > http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > NOTICE files are meant to copy verbatim the existing NOTICE
> > file.
> > > > > This
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > what I see in the Guice 3 NOTICE files:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Google Guice - Core Library
> > > > > > > > Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This product includes software developed at
> > > > > > > > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Google Guice - Extensions - AssistedInject
> > > > > > > > Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This product includes software developed at
> > > > > > > > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise,
> I
> > > > don't
> > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > RE Fineract. The last release I have of theres locally is
> > 0.6.0
> > > > and
> > > > > it
> > > > > > > > does not have these issues, so not sure where you're getting
> > this
> > > > > from.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - LGPL License: The Release Candidate - 2 doesn't include
> the
> > > > LGPL
> > > > > > > > license
> > > > > > > > > at all. Do you see LGPL license included anywhere (this
> might
> > > > have
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > present in the Release Candidate - 1 which was fixed in
> > Release
> > > > > > > > Candidate -
> > > > > > > > > 2)?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Gokul
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament <
> > > > > > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me
> > > otherwise.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified,
> > however
> > > it
> > > > > > > doesn't
> > > > > > > > > > seem to have been solved properly.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > - The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE
> > file
> > > > for
> > > > > > > Guice.
> > > > > > > > > > There is no need to declare the license usage for single
> > > > licensed
> > > > > > > code.
> > > > > > > > > > - You added the LGPL license. You cannot include LGPL
> > > > binaries.
> > > > > > > > > However,
> > > > > > > > > > I can't find the binaries so it should probably just be
> > > > omitted.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Other things look fine.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM Andreas Neumann <
> > > > anew@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra
> > > > > > > > 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > > > > > > > > > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of
> Tephra.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the
> > > > release.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Vote thread:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > > > > > > > > > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > > > > > > > > > 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%
> > > > > > > > 40mail.gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > %3E
> > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-d
> > > > > > > > > >
> > ev/201709.mbox/%3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xx
> > > > > > > > > > PEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Result thread:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > > > > > > > > > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
> > > > > > > > > > > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc.
> > can
> > > > be
> > > > > > > found
> > > > > > > > > at:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > > > > > > > > .0-incubating-rc2/src
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > > > > > > > > it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733
> > > > bb470450d7:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > > > > > > > > it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > > > > orgapachetephra-1010
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > For information about the contents of this release,
> see:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > > > > > > > > .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> > > > > > > > > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra
> > > > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > Andreas
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
I'm fine with giving a +1 assuming the NOTICE issue is fixed for next
release. Please feel free to ping me if you want a review of the NOTICE
contents before release.
John
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:34 PM James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:
> John - thanks for the review. If things look acceptable now, would you be
> willing to cast a vote?
>
> Anyone else?
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:58 AM Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, John! Is there anything else that we can do to address
> > concerns/issues regarding the release candidate?
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:26 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:21 PM Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi John,
> > > >
> > > > Regarding your comment,
> > > >
> > > > > > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I
> > don't
> > > > see
> > > > > > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The LICENSE and NOTICE files that, are in the distribution, are
> present
> > > in
> > > > the tephra-distribution directory (named LICENSE_BINARY,
> > NOTICE_BINARY).
> > > > Please let us know if they should be placed in a different location
> > and I
> > > > can address the same in the JIRA mentioned below.
> > > >
> > >
> > > It's fine to keep the binary copy of the NOTICE and LICENSE in your
> > source
> > > release. Clearly marking them this way works fine.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Also, let us know if you think we can proceed with the release. I
> have
> > > > opened JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-265) to
> > > address
> > > > the issue with the NOTICE file.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Gokul
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > John, is this a show stopper, or would it be ok if we address that
> > Jira
> > > > in
> > > > > the next release?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran <
> gokul@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks so much for the explanation, John! Really appreciate it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have opened a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/
> > > jira/browse/TEPHRA-265
> > > > )
> > > > > to
> > > > > > fix this issue. Please let me know if you have any questions or
> > > > comments
> > > > > > about the same.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:30 PM, John D. Ament <
> > > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Gokul,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:14 PM Gokul Gunasekaran <
> > > gokul@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi John,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for the review of the release candidate.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - NOTICE file for Guice: The NOTICE_BINARY file under
> > > > > > > tephra-distribution,
> > > > > > > > contains the notice for Guice. Please let us how we can fix
> it
> > > and
> > > > we
> > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > create a JIRA to fix this issue. We had followed the example
> of
> > > > > > including
> > > > > > > > libraries that has Apache License 2.0 in NOTICE, similar to
> the
> > > > > > Fineract
> > > > > > > > project.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Do you have an example? This is what your NOTICE file says:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Apache Tephra includes Guice v3.0 and Guice Assisted Inject
> v3.0.
> > > > > Tephra
> > > > > > > elects to include this software in this distribution under the
> > > Apache
> > > > > > > License.
> > > > > > > You can obtain a copy of the License at:
> > > > > > > http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > NOTICE files are meant to copy verbatim the existing NOTICE
> file.
> > > > This
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > what I see in the Guice 3 NOTICE files:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Google Guice - Core Library
> > > > > > > Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This product includes software developed at
> > > > > > > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Google Guice - Extensions - AssistedInject
> > > > > > > Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This product includes software developed at
> > > > > > > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I
> > > don't
> > > > > see
> > > > > > > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > RE Fineract. The last release I have of theres locally is
> 0.6.0
> > > and
> > > > it
> > > > > > > does not have these issues, so not sure where you're getting
> this
> > > > from.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > John
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - LGPL License: The Release Candidate - 2 doesn't include the
> > > LGPL
> > > > > > > license
> > > > > > > > at all. Do you see LGPL license included anywhere (this might
> > > have
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > > present in the Release Candidate - 1 which was fixed in
> Release
> > > > > > > Candidate -
> > > > > > > > 2)?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Gokul
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament <
> > > > > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me
> > otherwise.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified,
> however
> > it
> > > > > > doesn't
> > > > > > > > > seem to have been solved properly.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE
> file
> > > for
> > > > > > Guice.
> > > > > > > > > There is no need to declare the license usage for single
> > > licensed
> > > > > > code.
> > > > > > > > > - You added the LGPL license. You cannot include LGPL
> > > binaries.
> > > > > > > > However,
> > > > > > > > > I can't find the binaries so it should probably just be
> > > omitted.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Other things look fine.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM Andreas Neumann <
> > > anew@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra
> > > > > > > 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > > > > > > > > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the
> > > release.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Vote thread:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > > > > > > > > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > > > > > > > > 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%
> > > > > > > 40mail.gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > %3E
> > > > > > > > > > <
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-d
> > > > > > > > >
> ev/201709.mbox/%3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xx
> > > > > > > > > PEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Result thread:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > > > > > > > > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > > > > > > > >
> > 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
> > > > > > > > > > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc.
> can
> > > be
> > > > > > found
> > > > > > > > at:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > > > > > > > .0-incubating-rc2/src
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > > > > > > > it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733
> > > bb470450d7:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > > > > > > > it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > > > orgapachetephra-1010
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > > > > > > > .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> > > > > > > > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra
> > > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > Andreas
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
John - thanks for the review. If things look acceptable now, would you be
willing to cast a vote?
Anyone else?
Thanks,
James
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:58 AM Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks, John! Is there anything else that we can do to address
> concerns/issues regarding the release candidate?
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:26 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:21 PM Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi John,
> > >
> > > Regarding your comment,
> > >
> > > > > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I
> don't
> > > see
> > > > > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
> > > > >
> > >
> > > The LICENSE and NOTICE files that, are in the distribution, are present
> > in
> > > the tephra-distribution directory (named LICENSE_BINARY,
> NOTICE_BINARY).
> > > Please let us know if they should be placed in a different location
> and I
> > > can address the same in the JIRA mentioned below.
> > >
> >
> > It's fine to keep the binary copy of the NOTICE and LICENSE in your
> source
> > release. Clearly marking them this way works fine.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Also, let us know if you think we can proceed with the release. I have
> > > opened JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-265) to
> > address
> > > the issue with the NOTICE file.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Gokul
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > John, is this a show stopper, or would it be ok if we address that
> Jira
> > > in
> > > > the next release?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran <gokul@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks so much for the explanation, John! Really appreciate it.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have opened a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/
> > jira/browse/TEPHRA-265
> > > )
> > > > to
> > > > > fix this issue. Please let me know if you have any questions or
> > > comments
> > > > > about the same.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:30 PM, John D. Ament <
> > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Gokul,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:14 PM Gokul Gunasekaran <
> > gokul@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi John,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for the review of the release candidate.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - NOTICE file for Guice: The NOTICE_BINARY file under
> > > > > > tephra-distribution,
> > > > > > > contains the notice for Guice. Please let us how we can fix it
> > and
> > > we
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > > create a JIRA to fix this issue. We had followed the example of
> > > > > including
> > > > > > > libraries that has Apache License 2.0 in NOTICE, similar to the
> > > > > Fineract
> > > > > > > project.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you have an example? This is what your NOTICE file says:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apache Tephra includes Guice v3.0 and Guice Assisted Inject v3.0.
> > > > Tephra
> > > > > > elects to include this software in this distribution under the
> > Apache
> > > > > > License.
> > > > > > You can obtain a copy of the License at:
> > > > > > http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > NOTICE files are meant to copy verbatim the existing NOTICE file.
> > > This
> > > > > is
> > > > > > what I see in the Guice 3 NOTICE files:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Google Guice - Core Library
> > > > > > Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This product includes software developed at
> > > > > > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Google Guice - Extensions - AssistedInject
> > > > > > Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This product includes software developed at
> > > > > > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I
> > don't
> > > > see
> > > > > > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
> > > > > >
> > > > > > RE Fineract. The last release I have of theres locally is 0.6.0
> > and
> > > it
> > > > > > does not have these issues, so not sure where you're getting this
> > > from.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > John
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - LGPL License: The Release Candidate - 2 doesn't include the
> > LGPL
> > > > > > license
> > > > > > > at all. Do you see LGPL license included anywhere (this might
> > have
> > > > been
> > > > > > > present in the Release Candidate - 1 which was fixed in Release
> > > > > > Candidate -
> > > > > > > 2)?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Gokul
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament <
> > > > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me
> otherwise.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified, however
> it
> > > > > doesn't
> > > > > > > > seem to have been solved properly.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE file
> > for
> > > > > Guice.
> > > > > > > > There is no need to declare the license usage for single
> > licensed
> > > > > code.
> > > > > > > > - You added the LGPL license. You cannot include LGPL
> > binaries.
> > > > > > > However,
> > > > > > > > I can't find the binaries so it should probably just be
> > omitted.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Other things look fine.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM Andreas Neumann <
> > anew@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra
> > > > > > 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > > > > > > > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the
> > release.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Vote thread:
> > > > > > > > >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > > > > > > > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > > > > > > > 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%
> > > > > > 40mail.gmail.com
> > > > > > > > %3E
> > > > > > > > > <
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-d
> > > > > > > > ev/201709.mbox/%3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xx
> > > > > > > > PEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Result thread:
> > > > > > > > >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > > > > > > > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > > > > > > >
> 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
> > > > > > > > > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can
> > be
> > > > > found
> > > > > > > at:
> > > > > > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > > > > > > .0-incubating-rc2/src
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > > > > > > > >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > > > > > > it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733
> > bb470450d7:
> > > > > > > > >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > > > > > > it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > > orgapachetephra-1010
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > > > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > > > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > > > > > > .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> > > > > > > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra
> > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Andreas
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>.
Thanks, John! Is there anything else that we can do to address
concerns/issues regarding the release candidate?
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:26 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:21 PM Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Regarding your comment,
> >
> > > > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I don't
> > see
> > > > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
> > > >
> >
> > The LICENSE and NOTICE files that, are in the distribution, are present
> in
> > the tephra-distribution directory (named LICENSE_BINARY, NOTICE_BINARY).
> > Please let us know if they should be placed in a different location and I
> > can address the same in the JIRA mentioned below.
> >
>
> It's fine to keep the binary copy of the NOTICE and LICENSE in your source
> release. Clearly marking them this way works fine.
>
>
> >
> > Also, let us know if you think we can proceed with the release. I have
> > opened JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-265) to
> address
> > the issue with the NOTICE file.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gokul
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > John, is this a show stopper, or would it be ok if we address that Jira
> > in
> > > the next release?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks so much for the explanation, John! Really appreciate it.
> > > >
> > > > I have opened a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/TEPHRA-265
> > )
> > > to
> > > > fix this issue. Please let me know if you have any questions or
> > comments
> > > > about the same.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:30 PM, John D. Ament <
> johndament@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Gokul,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:14 PM Gokul Gunasekaran <
> gokul@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi John,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the review of the release candidate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - NOTICE file for Guice: The NOTICE_BINARY file under
> > > > > tephra-distribution,
> > > > > > contains the notice for Guice. Please let us how we can fix it
> and
> > we
> > > > > will
> > > > > > create a JIRA to fix this issue. We had followed the example of
> > > > including
> > > > > > libraries that has Apache License 2.0 in NOTICE, similar to the
> > > > Fineract
> > > > > > project.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you have an example? This is what your NOTICE file says:
> > > > >
> > > > > Apache Tephra includes Guice v3.0 and Guice Assisted Inject v3.0.
> > > Tephra
> > > > > elects to include this software in this distribution under the
> Apache
> > > > > License.
> > > > > You can obtain a copy of the License at:
> > > > > http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> > > > >
> > > > > NOTICE files are meant to copy verbatim the existing NOTICE file.
> > This
> > > > is
> > > > > what I see in the Guice 3 NOTICE files:
> > > > >
> > > > > Google Guice - Core Library
> > > > > Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
> > > > >
> > > > > This product includes software developed at
> > > > > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Google Guice - Extensions - AssistedInject
> > > > > Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
> > > > >
> > > > > This product includes software developed at
> > > > > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I
> don't
> > > see
> > > > > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
> > > > >
> > > > > RE Fineract. The last release I have of theres locally is 0.6.0
> and
> > it
> > > > > does not have these issues, so not sure where you're getting this
> > from.
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - LGPL License: The Release Candidate - 2 doesn't include the
> LGPL
> > > > > license
> > > > > > at all. Do you see LGPL license included anywhere (this might
> have
> > > been
> > > > > > present in the Release Candidate - 1 which was fixed in Release
> > > > > Candidate -
> > > > > > 2)?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Gokul
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament <
> > > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me otherwise.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified, however it
> > > > doesn't
> > > > > > > seem to have been solved properly.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE file
> for
> > > > Guice.
> > > > > > > There is no need to declare the license usage for single
> licensed
> > > > code.
> > > > > > > - You added the LGPL license. You cannot include LGPL
> binaries.
> > > > > > However,
> > > > > > > I can't find the binaries so it should probably just be
> omitted.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Other things look fine.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > John
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM Andreas Neumann <
> anew@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra
> > > > > 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > > > > > > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the
> release.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Vote thread:
> > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > > > > > > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > > > > > > 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%
> > > > > 40mail.gmail.com
> > > > > > > %3E
> > > > > > > > <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-d
> > > > > > > ev/201709.mbox/%3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xx
> > > > > > > PEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Result thread:
> > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > > > > > > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > > > > > > 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
> > > > > > > > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can
> be
> > > > found
> > > > > > at:
> > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > > > > > .0-incubating-rc2/src
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > > > > > it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733
> bb470450d7:
> > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > > > > > it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > orgapachetephra-1010
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > > > > > .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> > > > > > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra
> 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Andreas
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:21 PM Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Regarding your comment,
>
> > > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I don't
> see
> > > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
> > >
>
> The LICENSE and NOTICE files that, are in the distribution, are present in
> the tephra-distribution directory (named LICENSE_BINARY, NOTICE_BINARY).
> Please let us know if they should be placed in a different location and I
> can address the same in the JIRA mentioned below.
>
It's fine to keep the binary copy of the NOTICE and LICENSE in your source
release. Clearly marking them this way works fine.
>
> Also, let us know if you think we can proceed with the release. I have
> opened JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-265) to address
> the issue with the NOTICE file.
>
> Thanks,
> Gokul
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > John, is this a show stopper, or would it be ok if we address that Jira
> in
> > the next release?
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks so much for the explanation, John! Really appreciate it.
> > >
> > > I have opened a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-265
> )
> > to
> > > fix this issue. Please let me know if you have any questions or
> comments
> > > about the same.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:30 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Gokul,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:14 PM Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi John,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the review of the release candidate.
> > > > >
> > > > > - NOTICE file for Guice: The NOTICE_BINARY file under
> > > > tephra-distribution,
> > > > > contains the notice for Guice. Please let us how we can fix it and
> we
> > > > will
> > > > > create a JIRA to fix this issue. We had followed the example of
> > > including
> > > > > libraries that has Apache License 2.0 in NOTICE, similar to the
> > > Fineract
> > > > > project.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do you have an example? This is what your NOTICE file says:
> > > >
> > > > Apache Tephra includes Guice v3.0 and Guice Assisted Inject v3.0.
> > Tephra
> > > > elects to include this software in this distribution under the Apache
> > > > License.
> > > > You can obtain a copy of the License at:
> > > > http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> > > >
> > > > NOTICE files are meant to copy verbatim the existing NOTICE file.
> This
> > > is
> > > > what I see in the Guice 3 NOTICE files:
> > > >
> > > > Google Guice - Core Library
> > > > Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
> > > >
> > > > This product includes software developed at
> > > > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Google Guice - Extensions - AssistedInject
> > > > Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
> > > >
> > > > This product includes software developed at
> > > > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> > > >
> > > > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I don't
> > see
> > > > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
> > > >
> > > > RE Fineract. The last release I have of theres locally is 0.6.0 and
> it
> > > > does not have these issues, so not sure where you're getting this
> from.
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - LGPL License: The Release Candidate - 2 doesn't include the LGPL
> > > > license
> > > > > at all. Do you see LGPL license included anywhere (this might have
> > been
> > > > > present in the Release Candidate - 1 which was fixed in Release
> > > > Candidate -
> > > > > 2)?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Gokul
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament <
> > johndament@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me otherwise.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified, however it
> > > doesn't
> > > > > > seem to have been solved properly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE file for
> > > Guice.
> > > > > > There is no need to declare the license usage for single licensed
> > > code.
> > > > > > - You added the LGPL license. You cannot include LGPL binaries.
> > > > > However,
> > > > > > I can't find the binaries so it should probably just be omitted.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Other things look fine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > John
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM Andreas Neumann <anew@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra
> > > > 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > > > > > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Vote thread:
> > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > > > > > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > > > > > 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%
> > > > 40mail.gmail.com
> > > > > > %3E
> > > > > > > <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-d
> > > > > > ev/201709.mbox/%3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xx
> > > > > > PEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Result thread:
> > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > > > > > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > > > > > 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
> > > > > > > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> > > found
> > > > > at:
> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > > > > .0-incubating-rc2/src
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > > > > it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7:
> > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > > > > it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > orgapachetephra-1010
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > > > > .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> > > > > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Andreas
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>.
Hi John,
Regarding your comment,
> > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I don't see
> > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
> >
The LICENSE and NOTICE files that, are in the distribution, are present in
the tephra-distribution directory (named LICENSE_BINARY, NOTICE_BINARY).
Please let us know if they should be placed in a different location and I
can address the same in the JIRA mentioned below.
Also, let us know if you think we can proceed with the release. I have
opened JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-265) to address
the issue with the NOTICE file.
Thanks,
Gokul
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> John, is this a show stopper, or would it be ok if we address that Jira in
> the next release?
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks so much for the explanation, John! Really appreciate it.
> >
> > I have opened a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-265)
> to
> > fix this issue. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments
> > about the same.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:30 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Gokul,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:14 PM Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi John,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the review of the release candidate.
> > > >
> > > > - NOTICE file for Guice: The NOTICE_BINARY file under
> > > tephra-distribution,
> > > > contains the notice for Guice. Please let us how we can fix it and we
> > > will
> > > > create a JIRA to fix this issue. We had followed the example of
> > including
> > > > libraries that has Apache License 2.0 in NOTICE, similar to the
> > Fineract
> > > > project.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Do you have an example? This is what your NOTICE file says:
> > >
> > > Apache Tephra includes Guice v3.0 and Guice Assisted Inject v3.0.
> Tephra
> > > elects to include this software in this distribution under the Apache
> > > License.
> > > You can obtain a copy of the License at:
> > > http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> > >
> > > NOTICE files are meant to copy verbatim the existing NOTICE file. This
> > is
> > > what I see in the Guice 3 NOTICE files:
> > >
> > > Google Guice - Core Library
> > > Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
> > >
> > > This product includes software developed at
> > > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> > >
> > >
> > > Google Guice - Extensions - AssistedInject
> > > Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
> > >
> > > This product includes software developed at
> > > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> > >
> > > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I don't
> see
> > > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
> > >
> > > RE Fineract. The last release I have of theres locally is 0.6.0 and it
> > > does not have these issues, so not sure where you're getting this from.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > - LGPL License: The Release Candidate - 2 doesn't include the LGPL
> > > license
> > > > at all. Do you see LGPL license included anywhere (this might have
> been
> > > > present in the Release Candidate - 1 which was fixed in Release
> > > Candidate -
> > > > 2)?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Gokul
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament <
> johndament@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me otherwise.
> > > > >
> > > > > TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified, however it
> > doesn't
> > > > > seem to have been solved properly.
> > > > >
> > > > > - The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE file for
> > Guice.
> > > > > There is no need to declare the license usage for single licensed
> > code.
> > > > > - You added the LGPL license. You cannot include LGPL binaries.
> > > > However,
> > > > > I can't find the binaries so it should probably just be omitted.
> > > > >
> > > > > Other things look fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra
> > > 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > > > > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vote thread:
> > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > > > > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > > > > 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%
> > > 40mail.gmail.com
> > > > > %3E
> > > > > > <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-d
> > > > > ev/201709.mbox/%3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xx
> > > > > PEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Result thread:
> > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > > > > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > > > > 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
> > > > > > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> > found
> > > > at:
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > > > .0-incubating-rc2/src
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > > > it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7:
> > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > > > it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > > > > >
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapachetephra-1010
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > > > > >
> > > > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > > > .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> > > > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Andreas
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>.
John, is this a show stopper, or would it be ok if we address that Jira in
the next release?
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks so much for the explanation, John! Really appreciate it.
>
> I have opened a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-265) to
> fix this issue. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments
> about the same.
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:30 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Gokul,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:14 PM Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi John,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the review of the release candidate.
> > >
> > > - NOTICE file for Guice: The NOTICE_BINARY file under
> > tephra-distribution,
> > > contains the notice for Guice. Please let us how we can fix it and we
> > will
> > > create a JIRA to fix this issue. We had followed the example of
> including
> > > libraries that has Apache License 2.0 in NOTICE, similar to the
> Fineract
> > > project.
> > >
> >
> > Do you have an example? This is what your NOTICE file says:
> >
> > Apache Tephra includes Guice v3.0 and Guice Assisted Inject v3.0. Tephra
> > elects to include this software in this distribution under the Apache
> > License.
> > You can obtain a copy of the License at:
> > http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> >
> > NOTICE files are meant to copy verbatim the existing NOTICE file. This
> is
> > what I see in the Guice 3 NOTICE files:
> >
> > Google Guice - Core Library
> > Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
> >
> > This product includes software developed at
> > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> >
> >
> > Google Guice - Extensions - AssistedInject
> > Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
> >
> > This product includes software developed at
> > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> >
> > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I don't see
> > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
> >
> > RE Fineract. The last release I have of theres locally is 0.6.0 and it
> > does not have these issues, so not sure where you're getting this from.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > >
> > > - LGPL License: The Release Candidate - 2 doesn't include the LGPL
> > license
> > > at all. Do you see LGPL license included anywhere (this might have been
> > > present in the Release Candidate - 1 which was fixed in Release
> > Candidate -
> > > 2)?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Gokul
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me otherwise.
> > > >
> > > > TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified, however it
> doesn't
> > > > seem to have been solved properly.
> > > >
> > > > - The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE file for
> Guice.
> > > > There is no need to declare the license usage for single licensed
> code.
> > > > - You added the LGPL license. You cannot include LGPL binaries.
> > > However,
> > > > I can't find the binaries so it should probably just be omitted.
> > > >
> > > > Other things look fine.
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra
> > 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > > > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Vote thread:
> > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > > > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > > > 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%
> > 40mail.gmail.com
> > > > %3E
> > > > > <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-d
> > > > ev/201709.mbox/%3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xx
> > > > PEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
> > > > >
> > > > > Result thread:
> > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > > > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > > > 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
> > > > > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > >
> > > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found
> > > at:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > > .0-incubating-rc2/src
> > > > >
> > > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > > it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > > > >
> > > > > The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7:
> > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > > it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
> > > > >
> > > > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > > > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachetephra-1010
> > > > >
> > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > > > >
> > > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > > .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> > > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Andreas
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>.
Thanks so much for the explanation, John! Really appreciate it.
I have opened a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-265) to
fix this issue. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments
about the same.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:30 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Gokul,
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:14 PM Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Thanks for the review of the release candidate.
> >
> > - NOTICE file for Guice: The NOTICE_BINARY file under
> tephra-distribution,
> > contains the notice for Guice. Please let us how we can fix it and we
> will
> > create a JIRA to fix this issue. We had followed the example of including
> > libraries that has Apache License 2.0 in NOTICE, similar to the Fineract
> > project.
> >
>
> Do you have an example? This is what your NOTICE file says:
>
> Apache Tephra includes Guice v3.0 and Guice Assisted Inject v3.0. Tephra
> elects to include this software in this distribution under the Apache
> License.
> You can obtain a copy of the License at:
> http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>
> NOTICE files are meant to copy verbatim the existing NOTICE file. This is
> what I see in the Guice 3 NOTICE files:
>
> Google Guice - Core Library
> Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
>
> This product includes software developed at
> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>
>
> Google Guice - Extensions - AssistedInject
> Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
>
> This product includes software developed at
> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>
> I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I don't see
> where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
>
> RE Fineract. The last release I have of theres locally is 0.6.0 and it
> does not have these issues, so not sure where you're getting this from.
>
> John
>
>
> >
> > - LGPL License: The Release Candidate - 2 doesn't include the LGPL
> license
> > at all. Do you see LGPL license included anywhere (this might have been
> > present in the Release Candidate - 1 which was fixed in Release
> Candidate -
> > 2)?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gokul
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me otherwise.
> > >
> > > TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified, however it doesn't
> > > seem to have been solved properly.
> > >
> > > - The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE file for Guice.
> > > There is no need to declare the license usage for single licensed code.
> > > - You added the LGPL license. You cannot include LGPL binaries.
> > However,
> > > I can't find the binaries so it should probably just be omitted.
> > >
> > > Other things look fine.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra
> 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > > >
> > > > The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the release.
> > > >
> > > > Vote thread:
> > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > > 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%
> 40mail.gmail.com
> > > %3E
> > > > <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-d
> > > ev/201709.mbox/%3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xx
> > > PEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
> > > >
> > > > Result thread:
> > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > > 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
> > > > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > >
> > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> > at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > .0-incubating-rc2/src
> > > >
> > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > > >
> > > > The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7:
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
> > > >
> > > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetephra-1010
> > > >
> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > > >
> > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
> > > >
> > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Andreas
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Gokul,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:14 PM Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for the review of the release candidate.
>
> - NOTICE file for Guice: The NOTICE_BINARY file under tephra-distribution,
> contains the notice for Guice. Please let us how we can fix it and we will
> create a JIRA to fix this issue. We had followed the example of including
> libraries that has Apache License 2.0 in NOTICE, similar to the Fineract
> project.
>
Do you have an example? This is what your NOTICE file says:
Apache Tephra includes Guice v3.0 and Guice Assisted Inject v3.0. Tephra
elects to include this software in this distribution under the Apache
License.
You can obtain a copy of the License at:
http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
NOTICE files are meant to copy verbatim the existing NOTICE file. This is
what I see in the Guice 3 NOTICE files:
Google Guice - Core Library
Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
Google Guice - Extensions - AssistedInject
Copyright 2006-2011 Google, Inc.
This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I don't see
where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
RE Fineract. The last release I have of theres locally is 0.6.0 and it
does not have these issues, so not sure where you're getting this from.
John
>
> - LGPL License: The Release Candidate - 2 doesn't include the LGPL license
> at all. Do you see LGPL license included anywhere (this might have been
> present in the Release Candidate - 1 which was fixed in Release Candidate -
> 2)?
>
> Thanks,
> Gokul
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me otherwise.
> >
> > TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified, however it doesn't
> > seem to have been solved properly.
> >
> > - The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE file for Guice.
> > There is no need to declare the license usage for single licensed code.
> > - You added the LGPL license. You cannot include LGPL binaries.
> However,
> > I can't find the binaries so it should probably just be omitted.
> >
> > Other things look fine.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > >
> > > The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the release.
> > >
> > > Vote thread:
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com
> > %3E
> > > <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-d
> > ev/201709.mbox/%3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xx
> > PEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
> > >
> > > Result thread:
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> > v/201709.mbox/%
> > > 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
> > > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >
> > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > .0-incubating-rc2/src
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > >
> > > The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
> > >
> > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetephra-1010
> > >
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > >
> > > KEYS file available:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > >
> > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> 0.13.0-incubating
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Andreas
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Gokul Gunasekaran <go...@apache.org>.
Hi John,
Thanks for the review of the release candidate.
- NOTICE file for Guice: The NOTICE_BINARY file under tephra-distribution,
contains the notice for Guice. Please let us how we can fix it and we will
create a JIRA to fix this issue. We had followed the example of including
libraries that has Apache License 2.0 in NOTICE, similar to the Fineract
project.
- LGPL License: The Release Candidate - 2 doesn't include the LGPL license
at all. Do you see LGPL license included anywhere (this might have been
present in the Release Candidate - 1 which was fixed in Release Candidate -
2)?
Thanks,
Gokul
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me otherwise.
>
> TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified, however it doesn't
> seem to have been solved properly.
>
> - The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE file for Guice.
> There is no need to declare the license usage for single licensed code.
> - You added the LGPL license. You cannot include LGPL binaries. However,
> I can't find the binaries so it should probably just be omitted.
>
> Other things look fine.
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
> > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> >
> > The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the release.
> >
> > Vote thread:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> v/201709.mbox/%
> > 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com
> %3E
> > <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-d
> ev/201709.mbox/%3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xx
> PEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
> >
> > Result thread:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-de
> v/201709.mbox/%
> > 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
> > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > .0-incubating-rc2/src
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> >
> > The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
> >
> > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetephra-1010
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> >
> > KEYS file available:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andreas
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>.
Good point, my bad. I have removed everything except for the current
release candidate now.
-Andreas
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:25 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Yes, my fault, looked at the wrong dist. However, you shouldn't include
> old releases in the dist area. Please clean them up.
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:16 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > where do you see the LGPL? We had it, by mistake, in rc1, but it was
> > removed for rc2.
> >
> > Thanks -Andreas
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me otherwise.
> > >
> > > TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified, however it doesn't
> > > seem to have been solved properly.
> > >
> > > - The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE file for Guice.
> > > There is no need to declare the license usage for single licensed code.
> > > - You added the LGPL license. You cannot include LGPL binaries.
> > However,
> > > I can't find the binaries so it should probably just be omitted.
> > >
> > > Other things look fine.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra
> 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > > >
> > > > The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the release.
> > > >
> > > > Vote thread:
> > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-
> > > dev/201709.mbox/%
> > > > 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%
> 40mail.gmail.com
> > > %3E
> > > > <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-
> > > dev/201709.mbox/%3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsX
> > > QuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
> > > >
> > > > Result thread:
> > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-
> > > dev/201709.mbox/%
> > > > 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
> > > > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > >
> > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> > at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > .0-incubating-rc2/src
> > > >
> > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > > >
> > > > The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7:
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > > it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
> > > >
> > > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetephra-1010
> > > >
> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > > >
> > > > KEYS file available:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > > .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
> > > >
> > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> > 0.13.0-incubating
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Andreas
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Yes, my fault, looked at the wrong dist. However, you shouldn't include
old releases in the dist area. Please clean them up.
John
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:16 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> where do you see the LGPL? We had it, by mistake, in rc1, but it was
> removed for rc2.
>
> Thanks -Andreas
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me otherwise.
> >
> > TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified, however it doesn't
> > seem to have been solved properly.
> >
> > - The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE file for Guice.
> > There is no need to declare the license usage for single licensed code.
> > - You added the LGPL license. You cannot include LGPL binaries.
> However,
> > I can't find the binaries so it should probably just be omitted.
> >
> > Other things look fine.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
> > > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> > >
> > > The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the release.
> > >
> > > Vote thread:
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-
> > dev/201709.mbox/%
> > > 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com
> > %3E
> > > <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-
> > dev/201709.mbox/%3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsX
> > QuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
> > >
> > > Result thread:
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-
> > dev/201709.mbox/%
> > > 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
> > > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >
> > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > .0-incubating-rc2/src
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> > >
> > > The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > > it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
> > >
> > > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetephra-1010
> > >
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> > >
> > > KEYS file available:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> > >
> > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > > .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra
> 0.13.0-incubating
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Andreas
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org>.
Hi John,
where do you see the LGPL? We had it, by mistake, in rc1, but it was
removed for rc2.
Thanks -Andreas
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me otherwise.
>
> TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified, however it doesn't
> seem to have been solved properly.
>
> - The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE file for Guice.
> There is no need to declare the license usage for single licensed code.
> - You added the LGPL license. You cannot include LGPL binaries. However,
> I can't find the binaries so it should probably just be omitted.
>
> Other things look fine.
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
> > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
> >
> > The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the release.
> >
> > Vote thread:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-
> dev/201709.mbox/%
> > 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com
> %3E
> > <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-
> dev/201709.mbox/%3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsX
> QuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
> >
> > Result thread:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-
> dev/201709.mbox/%
> > 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
> > 40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > .0-incubating-rc2/src
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
> >
> > The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> > it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
> >
> > The Nexus Staging URL:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetephra-1010
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
> >
> > KEYS file available:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> > .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andreas
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Hi,
I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me otherwise.
TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified, however it doesn't
seem to have been solved properly.
- The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE file for Guice.
There is no need to declare the license usage for single licensed code.
- You added the LGPL license. You cannot include LGPL binaries. However,
I can't find the binaries so it should probably just be omitted.
Other things look fine.
John
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:13 PM Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
> release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
>
> The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the release.
>
> Vote thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-dev/201709.mbox/%
> 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-dev/201709.mbox/%3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
>
> Result thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-dev/201709.mbox/%
> 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
> 40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> .0-incubating-rc2/src
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
>
> The Nexus Staging URL:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetephra-1010
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com>.
Forwarding my +1 from the dev list.
Alan.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 19, 2017, at 03:56, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1. Transferring my vote over from the dev list vote.
>
>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
>> release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
>>
>> The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the release.
>>
>> Vote thread:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-
>> dev/201709.mbox/%
>> 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>> Result thread:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-
>> dev/201709.mbox/%
>> 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
>> 40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
>> .0-incubating-rc2/src
>>
>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
>> it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
>>
>> The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
>> it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
>>
>> The Nexus Staging URL:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetephra-1010
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
>>
>> KEYS file available:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
>>
>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
>> .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
>>
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andreas
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]
Posted by James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>.
+1. Transferring my vote over from the dev list vote.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Andreas Neumann <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
> release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
>
> The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the release.
>
> Vote thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-
> dev/201709.mbox/%
> 3CCANpmDOfN7MPHYjKt-PqNd3yY1KtgyNn6L1ANT63xxPEdSsXQuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Result thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-
> dev/201709.mbox/%
> 3CCANpmDOe8T70zU4h%2BgknSJ%2B%3DTOAkUw9praf46GTtuz-5Cr2-7jA%
> 40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> .0-incubating-rc2/src
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.13.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> it;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.13.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tephra.g
> it;a=commit;h=37467ce63934aca86f84eb61493733bb470450d7
>
> The Nexus Staging URL:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetephra-1010
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/anew
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.13
> .0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
>