You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> on 2017/03/31 13:40:48 UTC
[DISCUSS] GitHub as Master for ActiveMQ Artemis?
Hey guys
Just wondering, the infra guys have been prototyping a github as master
approach for some projects. Would there be any benefit to moving the
Artemis work over to GitHub as the master repo? May simplify some of the
workflow for merging PRs etc.
John
Re: [DISCUSS] GitHub as Master for ActiveMQ Artemis?
Posted by Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>.
The work-flow is currently pretty simple given there is a nice little script in the repo for merging PRs. That said, I'd be in favor of a 100% GitHub approach.
Justin
----- Original Message -----
From: "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 8:40:48 AM
Subject: [DISCUSS] GitHub as Master for ActiveMQ Artemis?
Hey guys
Just wondering, the infra guys have been prototyping a github as master
approach for some projects. Would there be any benefit to moving the
Artemis work over to GitHub as the master repo? May simplify some of the
workflow for merging PRs etc.
John
Re: [DISCUSS] GitHub as Master for ActiveMQ Artemis?
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
Git makes it pretty standard for us.. I'm fine either way.
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:40 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey guys
>
> Just wondering, the infra guys have been prototyping a github as master
> approach for some projects. Would there be any benefit to moving the
> Artemis work over to GitHub as the master repo? May simplify some of the
> workflow for merging PRs etc.
>
> John
--
Clebert Suconic